RankingGPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra

Compare models

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

85 published benchmark measures · 13 benchmark families contribute across 5 task areas. 5 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100
GPT-6 Astra capability radarComparison scores from 0 to 100. Unknown capabilities have no point; lines stop at gaps. Hollow points are preliminary. Exact values and support labels follow the chart.AgenticHard reasoningCodingHuman prefKnowledgeMultimodalLong context50100GPT-6 Astra · Agentic: 98.1 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Hard reasoning: 90.3 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Coding: 97.8 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Multimodal: 94.6 · PreliminaryGPT-6 Astra · Long context: 94.4 · Preliminary

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic5 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported98.1

5 core families; 6 direct opponents across 2 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 97.0–98.6; 0/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 97.4–98.5; 1/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: 91.8–99.6; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoning4 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported90.3

4 core families; 61 direct opponents across 10 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 79.7–95.9; 0/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 86.9–91.1; 0/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: 83.5–92.7; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Coding2 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported97.8

2 core families; 35 direct opponents across 9 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 97.8–98.0; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 94.6–98.1; 0/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: 91.0–99.5; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

    0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Multimodal1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary94.6

      1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      • ScreenSpot: 100.0 observed win share
        OpenAI · Source 1
      Long context1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary94.4

      1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

      Reported effort · Mixed settings

      Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

      Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

      Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence
      Score contributions and missing evidence

      13 contributing families across 5 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

      Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

      Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

      Model information & shareable badge
      Lab
      OpenAI
      Catalog status
      active
      Availability
      Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
      Family
      GPT-6
      Released
      —
      Context
      1,050,000 tokens
      License
      proprietary
      Model card
      https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/all
      Default Capability family coverage
      Documented-evidence family coverage/badge/gpt-6-astra.svg
      Benchmark scores & sources

      Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

      BenchmarkBucketScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
      Real-SWESupporting evidence46.25%Real-SWE · GPT-6 Astra · Codex CLI

      Effort: Not specified

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-10-13
      Reviewer bypass attempts · Sol 6.1 launch / safety stress testSupporting evidence0%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort max. Attempts to work around an automated safety reviewer blocking an action. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Safety stress outcomes are retained for inspection and excluded from capability scoring. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Comparison limit: Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Reviewer bypass attempts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Max

      lab self-report

      Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score.

      Reviewed 2026-09-29
      RiemannBenchSupporting evidence72%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Results sourced from the official Surge public leaderboard.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Results sourced from the official Surge public leaderboard. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 12: RiemannBench / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      Sandbox Bench · September2026 internalSupporting evidence45.5%
      Reported settings & source

      22 isolated CTF-style targets; protected-flag success metric

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.2.4 · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      ScreenSpot-Pro (no tools) · not specifiedMultimodal92.7%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; no tools

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Computer Use table / ScreenSpot-Pro (no tools) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      SEC-Bench Pro · May2026 / revised root-cause graderSupporting evidence85.4%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; reduced or absent production safeguards; May2026 JavaScript subset,183 vulnerabilities; revised agent root-cause grader

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Cybersecurity table / SEC-Bench Pro / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      SHP2 Protein Function Prediction · 3 unpublished assay datasetsSupporting evidence0.4 mean R-squared
      Reported settings & source

      System-card reported configuration; reasoning effort unspecified

      Production-named model result; separate helpful-only checkpoint omitted because no exact catalog identity.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.2.2 · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      SpireClimbSupporting evidence35%SpireClimb · Slay the Spire 2, Ascension 10

      Effort: Not specified

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-09-22
      SpireClimbSupporting evidence17%SpireClimb · Slay the Spire 1, Ascension 20 Heart

      Effort: Not specified

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-09-23
      SRE-Bench · 262 binaries / 19 programsSupporting evidence88%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; reduced or absent production safeguards; pass@1; all six objectives required

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Cybersecurity table / SRE-Bench / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      SRE-Bench · 262 binaries / 19 programsSupporting evidence99.2%
      Reported settings & source

      pass@4; four independent trials; all six objectives required; reduced production safeguards

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.2.3 · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting · 60 questionsSupporting evidence63.33%
      Reported settings & source

      observed performance

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.1 / Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting · 60 questionsSupporting evidence90%
      Reported settings & source

      refusal-adjusted upper estimate; refusals counted as successes

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.1 / Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Terminal-Bench · 4.0Coding58.2%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Argon self-computed; other models from the official public leaderboard. Highest scoring thinking level reported by Terminal-Bench authors. Argon agent identity is not specified in this methodology.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Argon self-computed; other models from the official public leaderboard. Highest scoring thinking level reported by Terminal-Bench authors. Argon agent identity is not specified in this methodology. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 8: Terminal-Bench 4.0 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      Terminal-Bench 4.0Coding58.18%Terminal-Bench 4.0 reported

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability
      official board2026-09-03
      Terminal-Bench 4.0 · 4.0Coding57.9%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Coding table / Terminal-Bench 4.0 / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1Agentic61.1%
      Reported settings & source

      Lower-cost setting; exact effort not specified

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Terminal-Bench Science chart caption · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      No matched opponent in this evaluation unit

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1Agentic55.43%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort low. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $11.4061; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / low · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Low

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1Agentic57.43%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort medium. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $12.3383; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / medium · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Medium

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1Agentic62%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort high. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $14.9534; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / high · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: High

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1Agentic60.86%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $15.7554; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: XHigh

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1Agentic68.1%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort max. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $23.7974; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Max

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · not specifiedAgentic64.6%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Academic table / Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      Terminal-Bench-Science · 0.1Coding68.1%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Argon self-computed with 6x verifier timeout to address verification timeout issues. Other models from the official public leaderboard. Modified verifier timeout is excluded from matched comparison.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Argon self-computed with 6x verifier timeout to address verification timeout issues. Other models from the official public leaderboard. Modified verifier timeout is excluded from matched comparison. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 10: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      ThinkingBox-BenchSupporting evidence58.31%ThinkingBox-Bench pass@1

      Effort: Not specified

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-10-03