RankingGPT-6 Astra
GPT-6 Astra
85 published benchmark measures · 13 benchmark families contribute across 5 task areas. 5 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →
Model evidence summary
This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →
Performance profile
Capabilities
Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.
Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.
Reported effort · Mixed settings
Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.
- Best across efforts: 34 observations
- High: 6 observations
- Low: 6 observations
- Max: 10 observations
- Medium: 6 observations
- XHigh: 7 observations
- Not specified: 62 observations
Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.
Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidenceScore contributions and missing evidence
13 contributing families across 5 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.
Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.
Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.
Model information & shareable badge
- Lab
- OpenAI
- Catalog status
- active
- Availability
- Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
- Family
- GPT-6
- Released
- —
- Context
- 1,050,000 tokens
- License
- proprietary
- Model card
- https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/all
- Default Capability family coverage
/badge/gpt-6-astra.svg
Benchmark scores & sources
Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.
| Benchmark | Bucket | Score | Harness | Evidence | Source-recorded date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-SWE | Supporting evidence | 46.25% | Real-SWE · GPT-6 Astra · Codex CLI | official board | 2026-10-13 |
| Reviewer bypass attempts · Sol 6.1 launch / safety stress test | Supporting evidence | 0%Reported settings & sourceReported reasoning effort max. Attempts to work around an automated safety reviewer blocking an action. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Safety stress outcomes are retained for inspection and excluded from capability scoring. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Comparison limit: Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Reviewer bypass attempts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-29 |
| RiemannBench | Supporting evidence | 72%Reported settings & sourceComparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Results sourced from the official Surge public leaderboard. Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Results sourced from the official Surge public leaderboard. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date. Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison. Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 12: RiemannBench / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-30 |
| Sandbox Bench · September2026 internal | Supporting evidence | 45.5%Reported settings & source22 isolated CTF-style targets; protected-flag success metric Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison. GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.2.4 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| ScreenSpot-Pro (no tools) · not specified | Multimodal | 92.7%Reported settings & sourceMaximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; no tools Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced. GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Computer Use table / ScreenSpot-Pro (no tools) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configurationcontributes to capability | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| SEC-Bench Pro · May2026 / revised root-cause grader | Supporting evidence | 85.4%Reported settings & sourceMaximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; reduced or absent production safeguards; May2026 JavaScript subset,183 vulnerabilities; revised agent root-cause grader Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced. GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Cybersecurity table / SEC-Bench Pro / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| SHP2 Protein Function Prediction · 3 unpublished assay datasets | Supporting evidence | 0.4 mean R-squaredReported settings & sourceSystem-card reported configuration; reasoning effort unspecified Production-named model result; separate helpful-only checkpoint omitted because no exact catalog identity. GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.2.2 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| SpireClimb | Supporting evidence | 35% | SpireClimb · Slay the Spire 2, Ascension 10 | official board | 2026-09-22 |
| SpireClimb | Supporting evidence | 17% | SpireClimb · Slay the Spire 1, Ascension 20 Heart | official board | 2026-09-23 |
| SRE-Bench · 262 binaries / 19 programs | Supporting evidence | 88%Reported settings & sourceMaximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; reduced or absent production safeguards; pass@1; all six objectives required Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced. GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Cybersecurity table / SRE-Bench / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| SRE-Bench · 262 binaries / 19 programs | Supporting evidence | 99.2%Reported settings & sourcepass@4; four independent trials; all six objectives required; reduced production safeguards Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison. GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.2.3 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting · 60 questions | Supporting evidence | 63.33%Reported settings & sourceobserved performance Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison. GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.1 / Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting · 60 questions | Supporting evidence | 90%Reported settings & sourcerefusal-adjusted upper estimate; refusals counted as successes Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison. GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.1 / Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| Terminal-Bench · 4.0 | Coding | 58.2%Reported settings & sourceComparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Argon self-computed; other models from the official public leaderboard. Highest scoring thinking level reported by Terminal-Bench authors. Argon agent identity is not specified in this methodology. Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Argon self-computed; other models from the official public leaderboard. Highest scoring thinking level reported by Terminal-Bench authors. Argon agent identity is not specified in this methodology. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date. Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison. Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 8: Terminal-Bench 4.0 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-30 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coding | 58.18% | Terminal-Bench 4.0 reportedcontributes to capability | official board | 2026-09-03 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 · 4.0 | Coding | 57.9%Reported settings & sourceMaximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced. GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Coding table / Terminal-Bench 4.0 / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configurationcontributes to capability | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1 | Agentic | 61.1%Reported settings & sourceLower-cost setting; exact effort not specified Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison. GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Terminal-Bench Science chart caption · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1 | Agentic | 55.43%Reported settings & sourceReported reasoning effort low. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $11.4061; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / low · reviewed 2026-09-29 | Published configurationcontributes to capability | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-29 |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1 | Agentic | 57.43%Reported settings & sourceReported reasoning effort medium. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $12.3383; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / medium · reviewed 2026-09-29 | Published configurationcontributes to capability | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-29 |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1 | Agentic | 62%Reported settings & sourceReported reasoning effort high. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $14.9534; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / high · reviewed 2026-09-29 | Published configurationcontributes to capability | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-29 |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1 | Agentic | 60.86%Reported settings & sourceReported reasoning effort xhigh. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $15.7554; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-29 | Published configurationcontributes to capability | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-29 |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · 0.1 | Agentic | 68.1%Reported settings & sourceReported reasoning effort max. Scientific research workflows using code and terminal tools, including analysis, simulation and model fitting. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $23.7974; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29 | Published configurationcontributes to capability | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-29 |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · not specified | Agentic | 64.6%Reported settings & sourceMaximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced. GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Academic table / Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Published configurationcontributes to capability | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-06 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science · 0.1 | Coding | 68.1%Reported settings & sourceComparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Argon self-computed with 6x verifier timeout to address verification timeout issues. Other models from the official public leaderboard. Modified verifier timeout is excluded from matched comparison. Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Argon self-computed with 6x verifier timeout to address verification timeout issues. Other models from the official public leaderboard. Modified verifier timeout is excluded from matched comparison. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date. Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison. Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 10: Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30 | Published configuration | lab self-report | Reviewed 2026-09-30 |
| ThinkingBox-Bench | Supporting evidence | 58.31% | ThinkingBox-Bench pass@1 | official board | 2026-10-03 |