RankingGPQA Diamond · source release snapshot; version not specified

GPQA Diamond · source release snapshot; version not specified

Data updated 12 Sept 2026

Bucket
Hard reasoning
Unit
percent
Direction
Higher is better
Version
source release snapshot; version not specified
Display harness
Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
Board
https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B

Compare published benchmark results with category weights →

Models

ModelScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI94.1%
Reported settings & source

Source benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card.

First-party reported result.

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95Blab self-report2026-09-12
Claude Fable 5Anthropic92.6%
Reported settings & source

Source benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card.

First-party reported result.

Comparison limit: The source states that Fable 5 results may involve fallback execution; an exact configuration is not established.

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95Blab self-report2026-09-12
Qwen 3.8-MaxQwen92.6%
Reported settings & source

Source benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card.

First-party reported result.

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95Blab self-report2026-09-12
Qwen3.7-maxQwen92.4%
Reported settings & source

Source benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card.

First-party reported result.

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95Blab self-report2026-09-12
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic92%
Reported settings & source

Source benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card.

First-party reported result.

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95Blab self-report2026-09-12
Amazon Nova 2 LiteAmazon79.6%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Amazon Nova 2 Pro PreviewAmazon81.4%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Amazon Nova LiteAmazon43.3%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Amazon Nova PremierAmazon56.9%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Amazon Nova ProAmazon49.9%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Claude Fable 5Anthropic92.6%
Reported settings & source

Table headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs.

First-party reported result.

moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

moonshotai/Kimi-K3lab self-report2026-09-12
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic73%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic91.3%
Reported settings & source

MAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06

MAI-Thinking-1 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic91%
Reported settings & source

Table headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs.

First-party reported result.

moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

moonshotai/Kimi-K3lab self-report2026-09-12
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic83.4%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic89.9%
Reported settings & source

MAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06

MAI-Thinking-1 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle82.8%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle86.4%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
GLM-5.1Z.ai86.2%
Reported settings & source

MAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06

MAI-Thinking-1 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
GLM-5.2Z.ai91.2%
Reported settings & source

Table headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs.

First-party reported result.

moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

moonshotai/Kimi-K3lab self-report2026-09-12
GPT-5OpenAI85.7%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
GPT-5 MiniOpenAI82.3%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
GPT-5.1OpenAI88.1%
Reported settings & source

Nova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Amazon Nova 2 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
GPT-5.4OpenAI92.8%
Reported settings & source

MAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06

MAI-Thinking-1 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
GPT-5.5OpenAI93.5%
Reported settings & source

Table headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs.

First-party reported result.

moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

moonshotai/Kimi-K3lab self-report2026-09-12
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI94.1%
Reported settings & source

Table headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs.

First-party reported result.

moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

moonshotai/Kimi-K3lab self-report2026-09-12
Kimi K3Moonshot93.5%
Reported settings & source

Table headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs.

First-party reported result.

moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12

moonshotai/Kimi-K3lab self-report2026-09-12
Kimi-K2.6Moonshot90.5%
Reported settings & source

MAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06

MAI-Thinking-1 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
MAI-Thinking-1Microsoft84.2%
Reported settings & source

MAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06

MAI-Thinking-1 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06