RankingGPQA Diamond · source release snapshot; version not specified
GPQA Diamond · source release snapshot; version not specified
- Bucket
- Hard reasoning
- Unit
- percent
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Version
- source release snapshot; version not specified
- Display harness
- Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
- Board
- https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B
Compare published benchmark results with category weights →
Models
| Model | Score | Harness | Evidence | Source-recorded date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | 94.1%Reported settings & sourceSource benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card. First-party reported result. Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Claude Fable 5Anthropic | 92.6%Reported settings & sourceSource benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card. First-party reported result. Comparison limit: The source states that Fable 5 results may involve fallback execution; an exact configuration is not established. Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Qwen 3.8-MaxQwen | 92.6%Reported settings & sourceSource benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card. First-party reported result. Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Qwen3.7-maxQwen | 92.4%Reported settings & sourceSource benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card. First-party reported result. Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | 92%Reported settings & sourceSource benchmark-specific methodology; Qwen benchmark effort unspecified, GPT-5.6 Sol max per table header. Max in Qwen model names is not a reported effort setting. Comparator settings and source citations as documented in the model card. First-party reported result. Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | Qwen/Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Amazon Nova 2 LiteAmazon | 79.6%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Amazon Nova 2 Pro PreviewAmazon | 81.4%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Amazon Nova LiteAmazon | 43.3%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Amazon Nova PremierAmazon | 56.9%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Amazon Nova ProAmazon | 49.9%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Claude Fable 5Anthropic | 92.6%Reported settings & sourceTable headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs. First-party reported result. moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | moonshotai/Kimi-K3 | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | 73%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic | 91.3%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | 91%Reported settings & sourceTable headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs. First-party reported result. moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | moonshotai/Kimi-K3 | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic | 83.4%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic | 89.9%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle | 82.8%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle | 86.4%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| GLM-5.1Z.ai | 86.2%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| GLM-5.2Z.ai | 91.2%Reported settings & sourceTable headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs. First-party reported result. moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | moonshotai/Kimi-K3 | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| GPT-5OpenAI | 85.7%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| GPT-5 MiniOpenAI | 82.3%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| GPT-5.1OpenAI | 88.1%Reported settings & sourceNova2 launch evaluation; benchmark-specific settings in report. tau2 Verified avg@3; telecom cited AA because user model sensitivity; comparators mix own runs and cited provider scores. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Amazon Nova 2 technical report · Table1 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | Amazon Nova 2 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| GPT-5.4OpenAI | 92.8%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| GPT-5.5OpenAI | 93.5%Reported settings & sourceTable headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs. First-party reported result. moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | moonshotai/Kimi-K3 | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | 94.1%Reported settings & sourceTable headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs. First-party reported result. moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | moonshotai/Kimi-K3 | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Kimi K3Moonshot | 93.5%Reported settings & sourceTable headers: Kimi K3, GPT-5.6 Sol, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 max; GPT-5.5 xhigh; Fable 5 max with fallbacks. Benchmark-specific footnotes override header settings; cited results are not new Moonshot evaluations. Benchmark-specific tools, harness and budget documented under Evaluation Details. Kimi temp1; single-step top_p.95,agentic top_p1; vision tools=Python,3runs except ZeroBench5runs. First-party reported result. moonshotai/Kimi-K3 · Performance table: GPQA Diamond · reviewed 2026-09-12 | moonshotai/Kimi-K3 | lab self-report | 2026-09-12 |
| Kimi-K2.6Moonshot | 90.5%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| MAI-Thinking-1Microsoft | 84.2%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |