RankingMistral Small 3.2

Mistral Small 3.2

Data updated 12 Sept 2026

2 published benchmark measures · 2 benchmark families contribute across 2 task areas. 2 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

Choose a configuration

A model-wide score would mix effort settings. This page summarizes published evidence; only identified configurations receive leaderboard ranks.

Compare measured configurations →

The capability chart summarizes evidence across reported settings, not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank.

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100
Mistral Small 3.2 capability radarComparison scores from 0 to 100. Unknown capabilities have no point; lines stop at gaps. Hollow points are preliminary. Exact values and support labels follow the chart.AgenticHard reasoningCodingHuman prefKnowledgeMultimodalLong context50100Mistral Small 3.2 · Agentic: 0.1 · PreliminaryMistral Small 3.2 · Human pref: 4.7 · Supported

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic1 families · 1 with independent evidence · Preliminary0.1

1 core families; 40 direct opponents across 19 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 11/11 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

  • GDPval: 2.5 observed win share
    artificialanalysis.ai · Source 1
Hard reasoningNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    CodingNo comparable evidenceUnknown

    0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 20/20 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Human pref1 families · 1 with independent evidence · Supported4.7

      1 core families; 114 direct opponents across 19 labs.

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: 0.9–15.8; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      • Human preference (Arena): 37.7 observed win share
        lmarena.ai · Source 1
      KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

      0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

        MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

        0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

        Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

        Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

        Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

        Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

          Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

          0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

          Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

          Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

          Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

          Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

            Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

            Compare 1 effort levels across 23 benchmark/harness combinations →

            Reported effort · Not specified

            Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

            Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

            Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

            Compare capability profiles →

            Score contributions and missing evidence

            2 contributing families across 2 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

            Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

            Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

            Model information & shareable badge
            Lab
            Mistral
            Catalog status
            deprecated
            Availability
            Documented provider API; deprecated and still accessible until retirement
            Family
            Mistral
            Released
            2025-06-20
            Context
            128,000 tokens
            License
            Apache 2.0
            Model card
            https://docs.mistral.ai/models/mistral-small-3-2-25-06
            Default Capability family coverage
            Documented-evidence family coverage/badge/mistral-small-2506.svg
            Benchmark scores & sources

            Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

            BenchmarkBucketScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
            GDPval-AAAgentic29Artificial Analysis GDPval-AA

            Effort: Not specified

            contributes to capability
            official board2026-09-12
            LMArena Text ArenaHuman pref1357LMArena Text

            Effort: Not specified

            contributes to capability
            official board2026-09-11
            ARC-AGI-2Hard reasoning
            DeepSWE v1.1Agentic
            GPQA DiamondHard reasoning
            Humanity's Last ExamHard reasoning
            LiveCodeBenchCoding
            MMLU-ProKnowledge
            OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic
            SWE-bench ProAgentic
            SWE-bench VerifiedAgentic
            Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic