Skip to content

RankingGrok 4.7

Grok 4.7

Data updated 21 Sept 2026

8 published benchmark measures · 0 benchmark families contribute across 0 task areas. 0 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Current configurationSources

Compare with

Choose a second model and its effort to see both profiles and benchmark differences below.

Compare withModel and configuration

Choose a configuration to compare. The overview below combines evidence across settings and has no model-wide rank.

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

AgenticNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 11/11 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoningNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

CodingNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 20/20 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

Reported effort · Mixed settings

Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

High: 1 observations
XHigh: 7 observations

Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

Score contributions and missing evidence

0 contributing families across 0 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

Model information & shareable badge

Lab: xAI
Catalog status: active
Availability: Available through the Grok API, Grok Build, Cursor, and supported third-party platforms; account and region restrictions may apply
Family: Grok 4
Released: 2026-09-21
Context: 500,000 tokens
License: proprietary
Model card: https://docs.x.ai/developers/models/grok-4.7
Default Capability family coverage: /badge/grok-4.7.svg

Benchmark scores & sources

Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

Benchmark	Bucket	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
AA Briefcase · 1.1	Supporting evidence	1657 Reported settings & source Grok 4.7 XHigh (DeepSWE: High); Grok 4.6 High; GPT-5.6 Sol Max; Claude Fable 5.1 Max. Launch comparison; per-model agent harness, evaluation budget and rerun provenance are not specified. Official launch table. Effort follows the column header except the Grok 4.7 DeepSWE asterisk, which explicitly means High. Original evaluator: https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/aa-briefcase Comparison limit: Secondary Artificial Analysis leaderboard report; not an additional independent evaluation. Use the original evaluator for reviewed exact-configuration comparisons. Grok 4.7 launch comparison · Model Improvements table: AA Briefcase · reviewed 2026-09-21	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Secondary Artificial Analysis leaderboard report; not an additional independent evaluation. Use the original evaluator for reviewed exact-configuration comparisons.	Reviewed 2026-09-21
CursorBench · 4.0	Supporting evidence	46.3% Reported settings & source Grok 4.7 XHigh (DeepSWE: High); Grok 4.6 High; GPT-5.6 Sol Max; Claude Fable 5.1 Max. Launch comparison; per-model agent harness, evaluation budget and rerun provenance are not specified. Official launch table. Effort follows the column header except the Grok 4.7 DeepSWE asterisk, which explicitly means High. Comparison limit: The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation. Grok 4.7 launch comparison · Model Improvements table: CursorBench · reviewed 2026-09-21	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation.	Reviewed 2026-09-21
DeepSWE v1.1 · 1.1	Coding	71% Reported settings & source Grok 4.7 XHigh (DeepSWE: High); Grok 4.6 High; GPT-5.6 Sol Max; Claude Fable 5.1 Max. Launch comparison; per-model agent harness, evaluation budget and rerun provenance are not specified. Official launch table. Effort follows the column header except the Grok 4.7 DeepSWE asterisk, which explicitly means High. Comparison limit: The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation. Grok 4.7 launch comparison · Model Improvements table: DeepSWE v1.1 · reviewed 2026-09-21	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation.	Reviewed 2026-09-21
EEBench	Supporting evidence	64% Reported settings & source Grok 4.7 XHigh (DeepSWE: High); Grok 4.6 High; GPT-5.6 Sol Max; Claude Fable 5.1 Max. Launch comparison; per-model agent harness, evaluation budget and rerun provenance are not specified. Official launch table. Effort follows the column header except the Grok 4.7 DeepSWE asterisk, which explicitly means High. Comparison limit: The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation. Grok 4.7 launch comparison · Model Improvements table: EEBench · reviewed 2026-09-21	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation.	Reviewed 2026-09-21
GDPval-AA · 2	Agentic	1695 Reported settings & source Grok 4.7 XHigh; Grok 4.6 High; Claude Fable 5.1 Max; GPT-6 Astra Max. GDPval launch chart. Launch chart rounded Elo. Original evaluator: https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/gdpval-aa Comparison limit: Secondary Artificial Analysis leaderboard report; retain the original evaluator once, without treating the launch reprint as additional evidence. Grok 4.7 launch comparison · Professional knowledge work: GDPval chart · reviewed 2026-09-21	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Secondary Artificial Analysis leaderboard report; retain the original evaluator once, without treating the launch reprint as additional evidence.	Reviewed 2026-09-21
Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark	Supporting evidence	19.6% Reported settings & source Grok 4.7 XHigh (DeepSWE: High); Grok 4.6 High; GPT-5.6 Sol Max; Claude Fable 5.1 Max. Launch comparison; per-model agent harness, evaluation budget and rerun provenance are not specified. Official launch table. Effort follows the column header except the Grok 4.7 DeepSWE asterisk, which explicitly means High. Original evaluator: https://www.vals.ai/benchmarks/hlab Comparison limit: Secondary Harvey leaderboard report; not an additional independent evaluation. Use the original Vals AI evaluation with its reviewed effort settings. Grok 4.7 launch comparison · Model Improvements table: Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark · reviewed 2026-09-21	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Secondary Harvey leaderboard report; not an additional independent evaluation. Use the original Vals AI evaluation with its reviewed effort settings.	Reviewed 2026-09-21
HealthBench Professional	Supporting evidence	56.7% Reported settings & source Grok 4.7 XHigh (DeepSWE: High); Grok 4.6 High; GPT-5.6 Sol Max; Claude Fable 5.1 Max. Launch comparison; per-model agent harness, evaluation budget and rerun provenance are not specified. Official launch table. Effort follows the column header except the Grok 4.7 DeepSWE asterisk, which explicitly means High. Comparison limit: The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation. Grok 4.7 launch comparison · Model Improvements table: HealthBench Professional · reviewed 2026-09-21	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation.	Reviewed 2026-09-21
Terminal-Bench · 4.0	Coding	38% Reported settings & source Grok 4.7 XHigh (DeepSWE: High); Grok 4.6 High; GPT-5.6 Sol Max; Claude Fable 5.1 Max. Launch comparison; per-model agent harness, evaluation budget and rerun provenance are not specified. Official launch table. Effort follows the column header except the Grok 4.7 DeepSWE asterisk, which explicitly means High. Comparison limit: The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation. Grok 4.7 launch comparison · Model Improvements table: Terminal-Bench · reviewed 2026-09-21	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report The launch table does not establish matching agent harnesses and evaluation settings. Retained as a provider claim; not a new comparable evaluation.	Reviewed 2026-09-21
ARC-AGI-2	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
DeepSWE v1.1	Agentic	—	—	—	—
GDPval-AA	Agentic	—	—	—	—
GPQA Diamond	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
Humanity's Last Exam	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
LiveCodeBench	Coding	—	—	—	—
LMArena Text Arena	Human pref	—	—	—	—
MMLU-Pro	Knowledge	—	—	—	—
OSWorld-Verified	Agentic	—	—	—	—
SWE-bench Pro	Agentic	—	—	—	—
SWE-bench Verified	Agentic	—	—	—	—
Terminal-Bench 2.1	Agentic	—	—	—	—