GPT-6 Sol

Data updated 31 Oct 2026

24 published benchmark measures · 7 benchmark families contribute across 3 task areas. 3 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic4 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary74.3

4 core families; 2 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 13/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

AutomationBench: 0.0 observed win share
OpenAI · Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source 5
OSWorld: 0.0 observed win share
OpenAI · Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source 5
Terminal-Bench Science: 0.0 observed win share
OpenAI · Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source 5
GDP.pdf: 0.0 observed win share
OpenAI · Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source 5

Hard reasoning1 families · 1 with independent evidence · Preliminary74.6

1 core families; 59 direct opponents across 10 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 6/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

ARC-AGI: 88.1 observed win share
arcprize.org · Source 1

Coding2 families · 1 with independent evidence · Preliminary85.1

2 core families; 21 direct opponents across 7 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 6/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 19/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Terminal-Bench: 76.2 observed win share
tbench.ai · Source 1
DeepSWE: 0.0 observed win share
OpenAI · Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Source 5

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

Reported effort · Mixed settings

Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

High: 11 observations
Low: 11 observations
Max: 14 observations
Medium: 11 observations
XHigh: 12 observations
Not specified: 15 observations

Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

Score contributions and missing evidence

7 contributing families across 3 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

Model information & shareable badge

Lab: OpenAI
Catalog status: active
Availability: Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
Family: GPT-6
Released: 2026-09-22
Context: 1,050,000 tokens
API list price: $2 input / $10 output per million tokens
Standard rate for requests up to 272,000 input tokens. Longer requests are priced at 2× input and 1.5× output for the whole request.
License: proprietary
Model card: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6-sol
Default Capability family coverage: /badge/gpt-6-sol.svg

Benchmark scores & sources

Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

Benchmark	Bucket	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	37.17% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3717, stored as 37.17 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	56.64% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5664, stored as 56.64 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	65.27% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6527, stored as 65.27 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	66.59% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6659, stored as 66.59 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	68.81% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6881, stored as 68.81 percent. Not an independent board. Article prose rounds this max point to 68.8%. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	37.17% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.1623; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Low contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-29
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	56.64% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.3798; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Medium contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-29
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	65.27% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.6404; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: High contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-29
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	66.59% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $1.0033; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: XHigh contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-29
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	68.81% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $2.7439; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Max contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-29
Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversations	Supporting evidence	11.42% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.0495; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.	Reviewed 2026-09-29
Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversations	Supporting evidence	6.86% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.0694; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.	Reviewed 2026-09-29
Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversations	Supporting evidence	5.14% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.0994; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.	Reviewed 2026-09-29
Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversations	Supporting evidence	4.52% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.1348; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.	Reviewed 2026-09-29
Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversations	Supporting evidence	4.57% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.179; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.	Reviewed 2026-09-29
Failure to disclose a broken search tool · Sol 6.1 launch / safety stress test	Supporting evidence	4.92% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. Adversarial test of whether agents disclose a broken search tool. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Safety stress outcomes are retained for inspection and excluded from capability scoring. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Comparison limit: Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Failure to disclose a broken search tool (lower is better) / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score.	Reviewed 2026-09-29
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	37.28% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3728, stored as 37.28 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	45.92% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4592, stored as 45.92 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	47.7% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.477, stored as 47.7 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	48.45% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4845, stored as 48.45 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	49.27% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4927, stored as 49.27 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierMath Erdős	Supporting evidence	1%	FrontierMath Erdős proof scorer Effort: Not specified	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-09-30
gdp.pdf · not specified	Agentic	21.8% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. Professional questions about complex PDFs across ten professional domains. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.33; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: GDP.pdf / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Low contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-29
gdp.pdf · not specified	Agentic	25.4% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. Professional questions about complex PDFs across ten professional domains. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.34; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: GDP.pdf / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: Medium contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-29
gdp.pdf · not specified	Agentic	28% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. Professional questions about complex PDFs across ten professional domains. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration. Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.35; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI. Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: GDP.pdf / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-29	Published configuration Effort: High contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-29