Skip to content

RankingGPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol

Data updated 22 Sept 2026

5 published benchmark measures · 0 benchmark families contribute across 0 task areas. 0 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

AgenticNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 11/11 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoningNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

CodingNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 19/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

Reported effort · Mixed settings

Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

High: 5 observations
Low: 5 observations
Max: 5 observations
Medium: 5 observations
XHigh: 5 observations

Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

Score contributions and missing evidence

0 contributing families across 0 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

Model information & shareable badge

Lab: OpenAI
Catalog status: active
Availability: Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
Family: GPT-6
Released: 2026-09-22
Context: 1,050,000 tokens
API list price: $2 input / $10 output per million tokens
Standard rate for requests up to 272,000 input tokens. Longer requests are priced at 2× input and 1.5× output for the whole request.
License: proprietary
Model card: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6-sol
Default Capability family coverage: /badge/gpt-6-sol.svg

Benchmark scores & sources

Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

Benchmark	Bucket	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	48.68% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4868, stored as 48.68 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	53.06% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5306, stored as 53.06 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	52.58% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5258, stored as 52.58 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	55.39% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5539, stored as 55.39 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	56.36% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5636, stored as 56.36 percent. Not an independent board. Article prose rounds this max point to 56.4%. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	21.16% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.2116, stored as 21.16 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	26.94% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.2694, stored as 26.94 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	31.2% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.312, stored as 31.2 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	33.18% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3318, stored as 33.18 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	31.96% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3196, stored as 31.96 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	37.17% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3717, stored as 37.17 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	56.64% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5664, stored as 56.64 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	65.27% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6527, stored as 65.27 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	66.59% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6659, stored as 66.59 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	68.81% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6881, stored as 68.81 percent. Not an independent board. Article prose rounds this max point to 68.8%. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	37.28% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3728, stored as 37.28 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	45.92% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4592, stored as 45.92 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	47.7% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.477, stored as 47.7 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	48.45% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4845, stored as 48.45 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	49.27% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4927, stored as 49.27 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	43.9% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.439, stored as 43.9 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Sol / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	54% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.54, stored as 54 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Sol / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	58.29% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5829, stored as 58.29 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Sol / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	60.54% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6054, stored as 60.54 percent. Not an independent board. Article prose rounds this xhigh point to 60.5%. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Sol / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	64.43% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6443, stored as 64.43 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Sol / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22