Skip to content

RankingGPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna

Data updated 22 Sept 2026

5 published benchmark measures · 0 benchmark families contribute across 0 task areas. 0 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

AgenticNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 11/11 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoningNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

CodingNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 19/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

Reported effort · Mixed settings

Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

High: 5 observations
Low: 5 observations
Max: 5 observations
Medium: 5 observations
XHigh: 5 observations

Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

Score contributions and missing evidence

0 contributing families across 0 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

Model information & shareable badge

Lab: OpenAI
Catalog status: active
Availability: Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
Family: GPT-6
Released: 2026-09-22
Context: 1,050,000 tokens
API list price: $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens
Standard rate for requests up to 272,000 input tokens. Longer requests are priced at 2× input and 1.5× output for the whole request.
License: proprietary
Model card: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6-luna
Default Capability family coverage: /badge/gpt-6-luna.svg

Benchmark scores & sources

Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

Benchmark	Bucket	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	36.32% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3632, stored as 36.32 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Luna / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	46.84% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4684, stored as 46.84 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Luna / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	43.6% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.436, stored as 43.6 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Luna / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	47.89% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4789, stored as 47.89 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Luna / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
Agents' Last Exam · V1	Supporting evidence	50.89% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. Agents' Last Exam V1. Long-horizon professional tasks across 55 sub-industries. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5089, stored as 50.89 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: Agents' Last Exam / GPT-6 Luna / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	1.2% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.012, stored as 1.2 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Luna / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	9.4% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.094, stored as 9.4 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Luna / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	14.5% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.145, stored as 14.5 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Luna / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	12.6% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.126, stored as 12.6 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Luna / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
AutomationBench · 1.0.6	Agentic	20.7% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. AutomationBench 1.0.6. End-to-end workflows across 47 tools in sales, marketing, operations, support, finance, and HR. The page says the Claude Fable 5.1 cost point omits Opus 5 fallbacks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.207, stored as 20.7 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: AutomationBench / GPT-6 Luna / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	2.43% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.0243, stored as 2.43 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Luna / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	44.47% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4447, stored as 44.47 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Luna / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	59.29% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5929, stored as 59.29 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Luna / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	61.28% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6128, stored as 61.28 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Luna / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1	Coding	66.59% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. DeepSWE v1.1. Original long-horizon software-engineering tasks. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.6659, stored as 66.59 percent. Not an independent board. Article prose rounds this max point to 66.6%. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Luna / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	25.66% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.2566, stored as 25.66 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Luna / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	35.53% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3553, stored as 35.53 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Luna / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	37.26% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3726, stored as 37.26 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Luna / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	37.1% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.371, stored as 37.1 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Luna / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1 Main	Supporting evidence	42.42% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. FrontierCode 1.1 Main, as identified in the surrounding article. The chart title is FrontierCode. Graded on correctness and mergeability. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4242, stored as 42.42 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: FrontierCode / GPT-6 Luna / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	8.26% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort low. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.0826, stored as 8.26 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Luna / low · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Low	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	31.54% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort medium. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.3154, stored as 31.54 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Luna / medium · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Medium	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	41.43% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort high. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.4143, stored as 41.43 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Luna / high · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: High	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	46.7% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.467, stored as 46.7 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Luna / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: XHigh	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22
OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offline	Agentic	52.68% Reported settings & source Reported reasoning effort max. Partial reward on the offline set from the v2026.08.08 release. OpenAI-published chart on the Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna page. Provider-published lab self-report. Vega-Lite chart data value 0.5268, stored as 52.68 percent. Not an independent board. Comparison limit: Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison. Introducing GPT-6 Sol and Luna · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Luna / max · reviewed 2026-09-22	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Provider-published lab self-report. Shown as a labeled claim and not admitted as a matched board comparison.	Reviewed 2026-09-22