RankingGPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra

Compare models

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

85 published benchmark measures · 13 benchmark families contribute across 5 task areas. 5 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100
GPT-6 Astra capability radarComparison scores from 0 to 100. Unknown capabilities have no point; lines stop at gaps. Hollow points are preliminary. Exact values and support labels follow the chart.AgenticHard reasoningCodingHuman prefKnowledgeMultimodalLong context50100GPT-6 Astra · Agentic: 98.1 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Hard reasoning: 90.3 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Coding: 97.8 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Multimodal: 94.6 · PreliminaryGPT-6 Astra · Long context: 94.4 · Preliminary

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic5 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported98.1

5 core families; 6 direct opponents across 2 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 97.0–98.6; 0/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 97.4–98.5; 1/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: 91.8–99.6; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoning4 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported90.3

4 core families; 61 direct opponents across 10 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 79.7–95.9; 0/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 86.9–91.1; 0/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: 83.5–92.7; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Coding2 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported97.8

2 core families; 35 direct opponents across 9 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 97.8–98.0; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 94.6–98.1; 0/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: 91.0–99.5; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

    0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Multimodal1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary94.6

      1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      • ScreenSpot: 100.0 observed win share
        OpenAI · Source 1
      Long context1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary94.4

      1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

      Reported effort · Mixed settings

      Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

      Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

      Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence
      Score contributions and missing evidence

      13 contributing families across 5 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

      Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

      Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

      Model information & shareable badge
      Lab
      OpenAI
      Catalog status
      active
      Availability
      Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
      Family
      GPT-6
      Released
      —
      Context
      1,050,000 tokens
      License
      proprietary
      Model card
      https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/all
      Default Capability family coverage
      Documented-evidence family coverage/badge/gpt-6-astra.svg
      Benchmark scores & sources

      Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

      BenchmarkBucketScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
      TroubleshootingBench · 156 questions / 52 protocolsSupporting evidence48.44%
      Reported settings & source

      observed performance

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.1 / TroubleshootingBench · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      TroubleshootingBench · 156 questions / 52 protocolsSupporting evidence63.46%
      Reported settings & source

      refusal-adjusted upper estimate; refusals counted as successes

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.1 / TroubleshootingBench · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Vals Finance Agent · 2Supporting evidence53.5%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Results sourced from Vals AI.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Results sourced from Vals AI. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 3: Vals Finance Agent 2 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      Vals IndexSupporting evidence63.1%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Vals AI composite, weighted by contribution to US GDP; overlapping component benchmarks do not add an aggregate ranking vote.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Vals AI composite, weighted by contribution to US GDP; overlapping component benchmarks do not add an aggregate ranking vote. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 1: Vals Index / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      Vibe Code Bench · 1.1Supporting evidence89.6%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Results sourced from the official Vals AI public leaderboard.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Results sourced from the official Vals AI public leaderboard. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 7: Vibe Code Bench 1.1 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      Warning circumvention · Sol 6.1 launch / safety stress testSupporting evidence17.42%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort max. Restriction-circumvention attempts in deliberately difficult low-stakes cases without full product safeguards. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Safety stress outcomes are retained for inspection and excluded from capability scoring. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Comparison limit: Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Warning circumvention (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Max

      lab self-report

      Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score.

      Reviewed 2026-09-29
      GDPval-AAAgentic————
      Humanity's Last ExamHard reasoning————
      LiveCodeBenchCoding————
      LMArena Text ArenaHuman pref————
      MMLU-ProKnowledge————
      OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic————
      SWE-bench ProAgentic————
      SWE-bench VerifiedAgentic————
      Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic————