RankingGPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra

Compare models

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

85 published benchmark measures · 13 benchmark families contribute across 5 task areas. 5 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100
GPT-6 Astra capability radarComparison scores from 0 to 100. Unknown capabilities have no point; lines stop at gaps. Hollow points are preliminary. Exact values and support labels follow the chart.AgenticHard reasoningCodingHuman prefKnowledgeMultimodalLong context50100GPT-6 Astra · Agentic: 98.1 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Hard reasoning: 90.3 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Coding: 97.8 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Multimodal: 94.6 · PreliminaryGPT-6 Astra · Long context: 94.4 · Preliminary

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic5 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported98.1

5 core families; 6 direct opponents across 2 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 97.0–98.6; 0/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 97.4–98.5; 1/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: 91.8–99.6; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoning4 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported90.3

4 core families; 61 direct opponents across 10 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 79.7–95.9; 0/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 86.9–91.1; 0/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: 83.5–92.7; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Coding2 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported97.8

2 core families; 35 direct opponents across 9 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 97.8–98.0; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 94.6–98.1; 0/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: 91.0–99.5; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

    0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Multimodal1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary94.6

      1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      • ScreenSpot: 100.0 observed win share
        OpenAI · Source 1
      Long context1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary94.4

      1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

      Reported effort · Mixed settings

      Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

      Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

      Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence
      Score contributions and missing evidence

      13 contributing families across 5 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

      Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

      Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

      Model information & shareable badge
      Lab
      OpenAI
      Catalog status
      active
      Availability
      Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
      Family
      GPT-6
      Released
      —
      Context
      1,050,000 tokens
      License
      proprietary
      Model card
      https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/all
      Default Capability family coverage
      Documented-evidence family coverage/badge/gpt-6-astra.svg
      Benchmark scores & sources

      Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

      BenchmarkBucketScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
      Humanity's Sixth SenseSupporting evidence53.6%HSS · max

      Effort: max

      Reported settings

      Full 522-task pass@1, task mean of three attempts; every rubric criterion must pass. 95% task-cluster bootstrap CI. Claude-Opus-5 judge. Scale AI + Elorian. Unversioned board; source hashes identify captures. Display only. Excluded from weighted Overall. Source-recorded date is the capture date, not a proven evaluation date.

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-10-22
      Internal Data Science Tasks · not specifiedSupporting evidence40.9%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Professional table / Internal Data Science Tasks / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Composite index or publisher-specific internal evaluation lacks a stable general-capability comparison unit.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Internal Database Migration Tasks · not specifiedSupporting evidence63.9%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Coding table / Internal Database Migration Tasks / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Composite index or publisher-specific internal evaluation lacks a stable general-capability comparison unit.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Internal Design Tasks · not specifiedSupporting evidence50%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Professional table / Internal Design Tasks / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Composite index or publisher-specific internal evaluation lacks a stable general-capability comparison unit.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Internal Research Debugging Evaluation · 41 research bugs; 6 alignment-auditing tasksSupporting evidence78.05%
      Reported settings & source

      System-card reported configuration; reasoning effort unspecified

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.3.1 · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Composite index or publisher-specific internal evaluation lacks a stable general-capability comparison unit.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      LABBench · 2Supporting evidence85.4%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. All models self-computed with Linux terminal, pre-installed bioinformatics tools, Python, R and internet access.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. All models self-computed with Linux terminal, pre-installed bioinformatics tools, Python, R and internet access. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 11: LABBench 2 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      LifeSciBench · Gold v1Supporting evidence60.3%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Science And Health table / LifeSciBench / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      LMArena Agent ArenaSupporting evidence14.7 LMArena Agent Arena · max

      Effort: Not specified

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-10-20
      LVBenchMultimodal87.5%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. All models self-computed without tools. Gemini 1 FPS; Astra 800 frames, Fable 300 frames and Opus 600 frames due to API limits. Unequal frame budgets are excluded from matched comparison.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. All models self-computed without tools. Gemini 1 FPS; Astra 800 frames, Fable 300 frames and Opus 600 frames due to API limits. Unequal frame budgets are excluded from matched comparison. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 18: LVBench / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      MedChemBench (Internal) · not specifiedSupporting evidence49.3%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Science And Health table / MedChemBench (Internal) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      No-CoT math time horizon · not specifiedSupporting evidence30.9 minutes
      Reported settings & source

      UK AISI; single forward pass; no chain of thought

      Time-horizon estimate; possible contamination noted by evaluator. Higher means harder tasks solved, not slower inference.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section9.3 · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Composite index or publisher-specific internal evaluation lacks a stable general-capability comparison unit.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      OpenAI MRCR v2 8-needle 256K-512K · v2Long context100%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; 8-needle 256K-512K

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Long Context table / OpenAI MRCR v2 8-needle 256K-512K / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      OpenAI MRCR v2 8-needle 512K-1M · v2Long context96.3%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; 8-needle 512K-1M

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Long Context table / OpenAI MRCR v2 8-needle 512K-1M / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      OpenScore String Quartets (1 - OMR-NED) · not specifiedSupporting evidence0.84 1 - OMR-NED
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Professional table / OpenScore String Quartets (1 - OMR-NED) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      OSWorld · 2.0 offline partial scoreAgentic72.6%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Argon self-computed, maximum of three single-attempt runs; offline subset partial score. Official Docker/evaluator, 1080p, 500 steps, Gemini CUA harness, parallel batch tools, compaction, pyautogui actuation, screenshot-only observations, UI-specific function declarations, safety filters, official 08.08 patch. Astra from its official blog. Anthropic combined online/offline results are excluded.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Argon self-computed, maximum of three single-attempt runs; offline subset partial score. Official Docker/evaluator, 1080p, 500 steps, Gemini CUA harness, parallel batch tools, compaction, pyautogui actuation, screenshot-only observations, UI-specific function declarations, safety filters, official 08.08 patch. Astra from its official blog. Anthropic combined online/offline results are excluded. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 16: OSWorld 2.0 offline partial score / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offlineAgentic72.6%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; offline set; partial credit; v2026.08.08; official task/grading settings

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Computer Use table / OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offlineAgentic62.17%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort low. Offline set from v2026.08.08; partial reward, not binary full-task success or OSWorld Verified. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $2.7159; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Astra / low · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Low

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offlineAgentic69.25%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort medium. Offline set from v2026.08.08; partial reward, not binary full-task success or OSWorld Verified. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $5.3594; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Astra / medium · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Medium

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offlineAgentic70.02%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort high. Offline set from v2026.08.08; partial reward, not binary full-task success or OSWorld Verified. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $6.9064; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Astra / high · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: High

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offlineAgentic71.27%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Offline set from v2026.08.08; partial reward, not binary full-task success or OSWorld Verified. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $7.4944; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Astra / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: XHigh

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      OSWorld 2.0 (v2026.08.08, offline set, partial score) · 2.0 / v2026.08.08 offlineAgentic73.49%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort max. Offline set from v2026.08.08; partial reward, not binary full-task success or OSWorld Verified. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $9.4353; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: OSWorld 2.0, offline set / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Max

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      Phage-plasmid Co-evolution · not specifiedSupporting evidence13.13 negative log-likelihood
      Reported settings & source

      System-card reported configuration; reasoning effort unspecified

      Lower is better. Helpful-only checkpoint omitted as distinct noncatalog identity.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.2.4 · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      PostTrainBench · 1.1Supporting evidence44.3%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. All models self-computed; OpenCode harness; 10-hour budget on one NVIDIA H100 GPU. Weighted aggregate across four base models and seven benchmarks.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. All models self-computed; OpenCode harness; 10-hour budget on one NVIDIA H100 GPU. Weighted aggregate across four base models and seven benchmarks. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 9: PostTrainBench 1.1 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      ProtocolQA Open-Ended · 108 questionsSupporting evidence41.36%
      Reported settings & source

      observed performance

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.1 / ProtocolQA Open-Ended · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      ProtocolQA Open-Ended · 108 questionsSupporting evidence45.37%
      Reported settings & source

      refusal-adjusted upper estimate; refusals counted as successes

      Provider-published result; preserves source setting without claiming a controlled cross-provider comparison.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.1 / ProtocolQA Open-Ended · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06