RankingGPT-6 Astra

GPT-6 Astra

Compare models

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

85 published benchmark measures · 13 benchmark families contribute across 5 task areas. 5 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100
GPT-6 Astra capability radarComparison scores from 0 to 100. Unknown capabilities have no point; lines stop at gaps. Hollow points are preliminary. Exact values and support labels follow the chart.AgenticHard reasoningCodingHuman prefKnowledgeMultimodalLong context50100GPT-6 Astra · Agentic: 98.1 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Hard reasoning: 90.3 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Coding: 97.8 · SupportedGPT-6 Astra · Multimodal: 94.6 · PreliminaryGPT-6 Astra · Long context: 94.4 · Preliminary

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic5 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported98.1

5 core families; 6 direct opponents across 2 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 97.0–98.6; 0/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 97.4–98.5; 1/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: 91.8–99.6; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoning4 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported90.3

4 core families; 61 direct opponents across 10 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 79.7–95.9; 0/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 86.9–91.1; 0/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: 83.5–92.7; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Coding2 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported97.8

2 core families; 35 direct opponents across 9 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 97.8–98.0; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 94.6–98.1; 0/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: 91.0–99.5; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

    0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Multimodal1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary94.6

      1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      • ScreenSpot: 100.0 observed win share
        OpenAI · Source 1
      Long context1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary94.4

      1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

      Reported effort · Mixed settings

      Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

      Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

      Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence
      Score contributions and missing evidence

      13 contributing families across 5 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

      Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

      Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

      Model information & shareable badge
      Lab
      OpenAI
      Catalog status
      active
      Availability
      Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
      Family
      GPT-6
      Released
      —
      Context
      1,050,000 tokens
      License
      proprietary
      Model card
      https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/all
      Default Capability family coverage
      Documented-evidence family coverage/badge/gpt-6-astra.svg
      Benchmark scores & sources

      Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

      BenchmarkBucketScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
      Coronavirus-ACE2 Cell-Entry Screen · not specifiedSupporting evidence0.42 composite score
      Reported settings & source

      System-card reported configuration; reasoning effort unspecified

      Observed named-model performance; helpful-only checkpoint omitted as distinct noncatalog identity.

      GPT-6 Astra System Card · Section10.1.1.2.3 · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      CWE-bench · 1Supporting evidence68%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Official public leaderboard; ranking uses pass@1 with pass@4 tiebreaks. Grid records pass@1 only.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Official public leaderboard; ranking uses pass@1 with pass@4 tiebreaks. Grid records pass@1 only. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 19: CWE-bench 1 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      DAYJOB FinanceSupporting evidence21.5%DAYJOB Finance · max

      Effort: Not specified

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-10-21
      DAYJOB HealthcareSupporting evidence11.6%DAYJOB Healthcare · max

      Effort: Not specified

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-10-21
      DeepSWE · 1.1Coding74.1%
      Reported settings & source

      Comparator maximum available thinking/reasoning when reported, otherwise best available result; exact setting not identified by this grid. Argon self-computed with mini-swe agent. Astra from the official public leaderboard; Fable and Opus from their system cards. Highest scoring thinking level per Datacurve.

      Provider-published launch claim, not independent measurement by Google for every row. Argon self-computed with mini-swe agent. Astra from the official public leaderboard; Fable and Opus from their system cards. Highest scoring thinking level per Datacurve. Methodology https://deepmind.google/models/evals-methodology/gemini-4-argon, SHA256 ff1df6bdeddc4c0f48840c09a8a7813b10ae7ad9e053892da68dabf64f09bff7. Preserve source rounding. Methodology says capabilities as of September 2026 and results as of October 2026; review date is source retrieval, not evaluation date.

      Comparison limit: Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Google Gemini 4 Argon launch and evaluation methodology · Launch grid row 5: DeepSWE 1.1 / GPT-6 Astra; methodology Additional Details · reviewed 2026-09-30

      Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      lab self-report

      Provider-published claim. Independent source results are admitted separately with exact checkpoint, effort and compatible protocol; this grid does not establish a matched comparison.

      Reviewed 2026-09-30
      DeepSWE v1.1Coding74.1%DeepSWE v1.1 reported

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability
      official board2026-09-22
      DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1Coding74.1%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Coding table / DeepSWE v1.1 / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1Coding67.04%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort low. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $1.5952; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Astra / low · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Low

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1Coding72.79%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort medium. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $3.0755; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Astra / medium · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Medium

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1Coding73.23%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort high. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $3.9237; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Astra / high · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: High

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1Coding74.12%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $4.4291; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Astra / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: XHigh

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      DeepSWE v1.1 · v1.1Coding73.23%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort max. Complex software-engineering tasks in original real codebases. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $7.4978; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: DeepSWE / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Max

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-29
      ExploitBench · not specifiedSupporting evidence100%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; reduced or absent production safeguards

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Cybersecurity table / ExploitBench / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      ExploitBench (June-Aug 2026) · June-Aug2026Supporting evidence39%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; reduced or absent production safeguards; 20 vulnerabilities / 13 Chrome releases

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Cybersecurity table / ExploitBench (June-Aug 2026) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      ExploitGym · not specifiedSupporting evidence42.4%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; reduced or absent production safeguards; v1 offline environment; no runtime package installation; token capped, no wall-clock cap

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Cybersecurity table / ExploitGym / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Narrow specialist biological, medical or security evaluation; preserved as raw evidence outside general capability scoring.

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversationsSupporting evidence6.26%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort low. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.2417; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / low · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Low

      lab self-report

      Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Reviewed 2026-09-29
      Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversationsSupporting evidence4.41%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort medium. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.3103; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / medium · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Medium

      lab self-report

      Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Reviewed 2026-09-29
      Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversationsSupporting evidence3.9%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort high. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.477; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / high · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: High

      lab self-report

      Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Reviewed 2026-09-29
      Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversationsSupporting evidence3.99%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort xhigh. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.6032; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / xhigh · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: XHigh

      lab self-report

      Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Reviewed 2026-09-29
      Factual error rate on difficult prompts · Sol 6.1 launch / user-flagged conversationsSupporting evidence3.91%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort max. Share of answers with at least one factual error on de-identified conversations where users flagged an earlier model error; deliberately difficult, not representative of typical usage. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Published chart cost per task $0.7865; source-specific cost does not establish consensus workload efficiency. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Comparison limit: Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Factual error rate on difficult prompts (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Max

      lab self-report

      Private user-flagged prompt protocol needs separate review before capability scoring; retained as an exact lower-is-better sourced claim.

      Reviewed 2026-09-29
      Failure to disclose a broken search tool · Sol 6.1 launch / safety stress testSupporting evidence1.5%
      Reported settings & source

      Reported reasoning effort max. Adversarial test of whether agents disclose a broken search tool. OpenAI research environment or API; same named metric and evaluation chart. No fallback is reported for this OpenAI configuration.

      Provider-published lab self-report. Safety stress outcomes are retained for inspection and excluded from capability scoring. Competitor results are republished from public reports; the page does not establish independent reproduction by OpenAI.

      Comparison limit: Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score.

      Introducing GPT-6.1 Sol · Chart: Failure to disclose a broken search tool (lower is better) / GPT-6 Astra / max · reviewed 2026-09-29

      Published configuration

      Effort: Max

      lab self-report

      Safety failure behavior is not a capability or intelligence score.

      Reviewed 2026-09-29
      FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (score) · 1.1Supporting evidence64.5%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; Codex-style developer instruction on tests, reuse and repository conventions

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Coding table / FrontierCode 1.1 Extended (score) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) · 1.1Supporting evidence53.3%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API; Codex-style developer instruction on tests, reuse and repository conventions

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Coding table / FrontierCode 1.1 Main (score) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      Reviewed 2026-09-06
      FrontierMath ErdősSupporting evidence3%FrontierMath Erdős proof scorer

      Effort: Not specified

      official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      2026-08-28
      FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) · v2Hard reasoning97.6%
      Reported settings & source

      Maximum reported across reasoning efforts; OpenAI research environment or API

      Provider-published result; comparator measurements are not automatically independently reproduced.

      GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence · Academic table / FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) / GPT‑6 Astra · reviewed 2026-09-06

      Published configuration

      Effort: Best across efforts

      contributes to capability
      lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06