UnifyBench

RankingGPT-5

GPT-5

Compare models

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

18 published benchmark measures · 11 benchmark families contribute across 5 task areas. 3 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100
GPT-5 capability radarComparison scores from 0 to 100. Unknown capabilities have no point; lines stop at gaps. Hollow points are preliminary. Exact values and support labels follow the chart.AgenticHard reasoningCodingHuman prefKnowledgeMultimodalLong context50100GPT-5 · Agentic: 0.9 · SupportedGPT-5 · Hard reasoning: 33.0 · SupportedGPT-5 · Coding: 3.4 · Supported

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic2 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported0.9

2 core families; 11 direct opponents across 4 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 0.2–9.1; 2/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 0.2–13.5; 1/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: 0.1–6.5; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

  • Bfcl V4: 77.3 observed win share
    Amazon · Source 1
  • MCP-Atlas: 100.0 observed win share
    Amazon · Source 1
Hard reasoning3 families · 1 with independent evidence · Supported33.0

3 core families; 66 direct opponents across 11 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 20.4–43.3; 0/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 23.9–35.0; 1/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: 22.4–41.8; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

  • ARC-AGI: 33.9 observed win share
    arcprize.org · Source 1
  • Aime: 100.0 observed win share
    Amazon · Source 1
  • GPQA: 81.8 observed win share
    Amazon · Source 1
Coding2 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported3.4

2 core families; 9 direct opponents across 4 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 1.5–14.4; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 2.1–13.1; 1/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: 1.7–8.8; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

  • LiveCodeBench: 88.9 observed win share
    Amazon · Source 1
  • SWE-bench Verified: 66.7 observed win share
    Amazon · Source 1
Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    Knowledge1 families · 0 with independent evidence · PreliminaryUnknown

    1 core families; 11 direct opponents across 4 labs. No connected comparison to the complete reference panel

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    • MMLU-Pro: 90.9 observed win share
      Amazon · Source 1
    Multimodal3 families · 0 with independent evidence · PreliminaryUnknown

    3 core families; 11 direct opponents across 4 labs. No connected comparison to the complete reference panel

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    • Ocrbench V2 Average Accuracy: 54.5 observed win share
      Amazon · Source 1
    • Mmmu Pro: 100.0 observed win share
      Amazon · Source 1
    • ScreenSpot: 33.3 observed win share
      Amazon · Source 1
    Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

    0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

      Reported effort · Not specified

      Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

      Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

      Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence
      Score contributions and missing evidence

      11 contributing families across 5 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

      Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

      Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

      Model information & shareable badge
      Lab
      OpenAI
      Catalog status
      deprecated · Retirement 2026-12-11
      Availability
      Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
      Family
      gpt-5
      Released
      —
      Context
      —
      License
      proprietary
      Model card
      https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/models/all
      Default Capability family coverage
      Documented-evidence family coverage/badge/gpt-5.svg
      Benchmark scores & sources

      Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

      BenchmarkBucketScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
      OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic————
      SWE-bench ProAgentic————
      SWE-bench VerifiedAgentic————
      Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic————