RankingGLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

15 published benchmark measures · 6 benchmark families contribute across 4 task areas. 3 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic1 families · 1 with independent evidence · Preliminary62.6

1 core families; 42 direct opponents across 16 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 13/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

GDPval: 95.2 observed win share
artificialanalysis.ai · Source 1

Hard reasoning2 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported42.1

2 core families; 61 direct opponents across 10 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 34.1–52.4; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 33.4–43.6; 2/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: 38.9–45.6; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

GPQA: 10.0 observed win share
artificialanalysis.ai · Source 1
ARC-AGI: 62.7 observed win share
arcprize.org · Source 1

Coding2 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported66.9

2 core families; 35 direct opponents across 9 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 67.0–70.8; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 61.9–69.0; 2/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: 63.1–68.3; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Terminal-Bench: 52.4 observed win share
tbench.ai · Source 1
DeepSWE: 55.6 observed win share
deepswe.datacurve.ai · Source 1

Human pref1 families · 1 with independent evidence · PreliminaryUnknown

1 core families; 76 direct opponents across 17 labs. No connected comparison to the complete reference panel

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human preference (Arena): 88.2 observed win share
lmarena.ai · Source 1

KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

Reported effort · Not specified

Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

Not specified: 15 observations

Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

Score contributions and missing evidence

6 contributing families across 4 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

Model information & shareable badge

Lab: Z.ai
Catalog status: active
Availability: Documented provider API; downloadable official weights
Family: GLM
Released: —
Context: 1,000,000 tokens
License: MIT
Model card: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/overview
Default Capability family coverage: /badge/glm-5.3-flash.svg

Benchmark scores & sources

Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

Benchmark	Bucket	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
ARC-AGI-2	Hard reasoning	65.8%	ARC Prize verified Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	official board	2026-08-26
Artificial Analysis Cyber Index	Supporting evidence	49.9235527532159	Artificial Analysis Stirrup · Cyber Index v1.0 · unspecified Effort: Unspecified Cyber Index source settings Artificial Analysis Stirrup, v1.0. Display only. This composite measures defensive source-code tasks. Successful capability scores depend on safety refusals, and refusal rates are reported separately. It does not enter weighted Overall. Official Cyber Index board	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-10-21
AutomationBench-AA	Supporting evidence	60.36862782167782%	Artificial Analysis AutomationBench-AA Effort: Not specified	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-10-20
Bug Hunt Bench	Supporting evidence	16.86%	Bug Hunt Bench · max Effort: Not specified	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-09-15
DAYJOB Finance	Supporting evidence	2.3%	DAYJOB Finance · max Effort: Not specified	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-10-21
DAYJOB Healthcare	Supporting evidence	0.4%	DAYJOB Healthcare · max Effort: Not specified	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-10-21
DeepSWE v1.1	Coding	63.4%	DeepSWE v1.1 reported Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	official board	2026-09-22
FrontierSWE v2	Supporting evidence	18.1%	Proximal FrontierSWE v2 · Proximus · unspecified Effort: Not specified	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-10-22
GDPval-AA	Agentic	1642	Artificial Analysis GDPval-AA Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	official board	2026-10-22
GPQA Diamond	Hard reasoning	91.212%	GPQA Diamond reported Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	independent repro	2026-10-20
Humanity's Sixth Sense	Supporting evidence	26.8%	HSS · max Effort: max Reported settings Full 522-task pass@1, task mean of three attempts; every rubric criterion must pass. 95% task-cluster bootstrap CI. Claude-Opus-5 judge. Scale AI + Elorian. Unversioned board; source hashes identify captures. Display only. Excluded from weighted Overall. Source-recorded date is the capture date, not a proven evaluation date.	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-10-22
LMArena Agent Arena	Supporting evidence	-1.57	LMArena Agent Arena · unspecified Effort: Not specified	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-10-20
LMArena Text Arena	Human pref	1475	LMArena Text Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	official board	2026-10-20
Terminal-Bench 4.0	Coding	35.76%	Terminal-Bench 4.0 reported Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	official board	2026-08-26
Toolathlon-Verified (official board)	Supporting evidence	78.4%	Toolathlon-Verified Default agent Effort: Not specified	official board Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	2026-08-30
Humanity's Last Exam	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
LiveCodeBench	Coding	—	—	—	—
MMLU-Pro	Knowledge	—	—	—	—
OSWorld-Verified	Agentic	—	—	—	—
SWE-bench Pro	Agentic	—	—	—	—
SWE-bench Verified	Agentic	—	—	—	—
Terminal-Bench 2.1	Agentic	—	—	—	—