RankingGemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon

Compare models

Data updated 1 Oct 2026

19 published benchmark measures · 1 benchmark families contribute across 1 task areas. 1 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100
Gemini 4 Argon capability radarComparison scores from 0 to 100. Unknown capabilities have no point; lines stop at gaps. Hollow points are preliminary. Exact values and support labels follow the chart.AgenticHard reasoningCodingHuman prefKnowledgeMultimodalLong context50100Gemini 4 Argon · Human pref: 64.3 · Supported

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

AgenticNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 13/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    Hard reasoningNo comparable evidenceUnknown

    0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 6/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      CodingNo comparable evidenceUnknown

      0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

      Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

      Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 6/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 19/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

      Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

      Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

        Human pref1 families · 1 with independent evidence · Supported64.3

        1 core families; 114 direct opponents across 19 labs.

        Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

        Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: 56.5–74.9; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

        Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

        Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

        • Human preference (Arena): 100.0 observed win share
          lmarena.ai · Source 1
        KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

        0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

        Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

        Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

        Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

        Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

          MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

          0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

          Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

          Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

          Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

          Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

            Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

            0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

            Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

            Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

            Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

            Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

              Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

              Reported effort · Not specified

              Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

              Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

              Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence
              Score contributions and missing evidence

              1 contributing families across 1 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

              Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

              Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

              Model information & shareable badge
              Lab
              Google
              Catalog status
              limited
              Availability
              Trusted cyber defenders through the Fairwind Program. Broader developer, enterprise and consumer access is planned, starting with paid API customers and Google AI Ultra subscribers.
              Family
              Gemini 4
              Released
              2026-09-30
              Context
              —
              API list price
              $2 input / $10 output per million tokens
              Announced introductory API pricing, not general availability. Cache reads 95% below input price. After the introductory period, $4 input and $20 output per million tokens; expiry date not published.
              License
              proprietary
              Model card
              https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-4-argon/
              Default Capability family coverage
              Documented-evidence family coverage/badge/gemini-4-argon.svg
              Benchmark scores & sources

              Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

              BenchmarkBucketScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
              Humanity's Last ExamHard reasoning————
              LiveCodeBenchCoding————
              MMLU-ProKnowledge————
              OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic————
              SWE-bench ProAgentic————
              SWE-bench VerifiedAgentic————
              Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic————