RankingCommand A Reasoning 08 2025

Command A Reasoning 08 2025

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

10 published benchmark measures · 0 benchmark families contribute across 0 task areas. 0 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

AgenticNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 13/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoning1 families · 0 with independent evidence · PreliminaryUnknown

1 core families; 1 direct opponents across 1 labs. No connected comparison to the complete reference panel

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 6/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Aime: 0.0 observed win share
Cohere · Source 1

CodingNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 6/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 19/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human prefNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

Reported effort · Not specified

Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

Not specified: 10 observations

Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

Score contributions and missing evidence

0 contributing families across 0 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

Model information & shareable badge

Lab: Cohere
Catalog status: active
Availability: Documented provider API; downloadable official weights
Family: Command
Released: —
Context: 256,000 tokens
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0
Model card: https://docs.cohere.com/docs/models
Default Capability family coverage: /badge/command-a-reasoning-08-2025.svg

Benchmark scores & sources

Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

Benchmark	Bucket	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
AIME 2025 · source release snapshot; version as labeled	Hard reasoning	57% Reported settings & source Official30questions x10 repeats; pass@1. First-party chart numeric label, visually verified. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Image3 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
IFBench · source release snapshot; version as labeled	Supporting evidence	36% Reported settings & source Single-turn loose,prompt accuracy,294prompts x5 repeats. First-party chart numeric label, visually verified. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Image3 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
MT-AIME 2025 Arabic/Japanese/Korean · source release snapshot; version as labeled	Supporting evidence	53% Reported settings & source Internal Command A Translate translations; Arabic,Japanese,Korean. First-party chart numeric label, visually verified. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Image6 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
North Agentic Question Answering · source release snapshot; version as labeled	Supporting evidence	45% Reported settings & source Internal North enterprise MCP cloud-file QA,LLM judge. First-party chart numeric label, visually verified. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Image4 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Composite index or publisher-specific internal evaluation lacks a stable general-capability comparison unit.	Reviewed 2026-09-06
North Data Analysis · source release snapshot; version as labeled	Supporting evidence	13% Reported settings & source Internal North uploaded spreadsheet data-science tasks,LLM judge. First-party chart numeric label, visually verified. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Image4 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Composite index or publisher-specific internal evaluation lacks a stable general-capability comparison unit.	Reviewed 2026-09-06
North Memory Usage Quality · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	39% Reported settings & source Cohere launch evaluation; North metric uses internal LLM judge. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Performance table · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Composite index or publisher-specific internal evaluation lacks a stable general-capability comparison unit.	Reviewed 2026-09-06
SciCode · source release snapshot; version as labeled	Coding	30% Reported settings & source 65problems/288subproblems; scientist-annotated background. First-party chart numeric label, visually verified. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Image3 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Original SciCode grading defects are under review; retained as supporting evidence, excluded from aggregate and capability scores. Corrected SciCode-Verified requires a separate protocol review. Sources: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04975 and https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/scicode	Reviewed 2026-09-06
tau2-Bench Telecom · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	37% Reported settings & source Cohere launch evaluation; North metric uses internal LLM judge. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Performance table · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
Terminal-Bench Hard · source release snapshot; version not specified	Coding	3% Reported settings & source Cohere launch evaluation; North metric uses internal LLM judge. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Performance table · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Terminal-Bench coding slot admits version 4.0 only. Earlier versions remain stored and are not mixed into that slot.	Reviewed 2026-09-06
WMT24++ 50 varieties · source release snapshot; version as labeled	Supporting evidence	73 xCOMETxl score Reported settings & source xCOMETxl average50 varieties,including internal Irish/Maltese translations and Serbian transliteration. First-party chart numeric label, visually verified. Command A+ launch benchmarks · Image6 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
ARC-AGI-2	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
DeepSWE v1.1	Agentic	—	—	—	—
GDPval-AA	Agentic	—	—	—	—
GPQA Diamond	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
Humanity's Last Exam	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
LiveCodeBench	Coding	—	—	—	—
LMArena Text Arena	Human pref	—	—	—	—
MMLU-Pro	Knowledge	—	—	—	—
OSWorld-Verified	Agentic	—	—	—	—
SWE-bench Pro	Agentic	—	—	—	—
SWE-bench Verified	Agentic	—	—	—	—
Terminal-Bench 2.1	Agentic	—	—	—	—