RankingClaude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7

Data updated 12 Sept 2026

33 published benchmark measures · 11 benchmark families contribute across 5 task areas. 5 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Model evidence summary

Choose a configuration

A model-wide score would mix effort settings. This page summarizes published evidence; only identified configurations receive leaderboard ranks.

Compare measured configurations →

The capability chart summarizes evidence across reported settings, not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank.

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic6 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported28.7

6 core families; 7 direct opponents across 6 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 25.6–32.5; 0/11 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 27.7–32.6; 1/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: 25.4–35.2; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Browsecomp: 35.7 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1
Apex Agents: 80.0 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1
GDPval: 85.7 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1
OSWorld: 100.0 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1
OfficeQA: 33.3 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1
MCP-Atlas: 100.0 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1

Hard reasoning1 families · 1 with independent evidence · Preliminary28.9

1 core families; 7 direct opponents across 5 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 7/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Humanity’s Last Exam: 71.4 observed win share
scale.com · Source 1

Coding2 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported58.0

2 core families; 7 direct opponents across 6 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 53.4–70.1; 2/7 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 55.3–67.6; 1/20 unsupported. Smoothing check: 50.7–66.3; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

SWE-bench Pro: 100.0 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1
SWE-bench Verified: 100.0 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1

Human pref1 families · 1 with independent evidence · Supported60.2

1 core families; 114 direct opponents across 19 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: 54.7–67.5; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human preference (Arena): 98.2 observed win share
lmarena.ai · Source 1

KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Multimodal1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary3.2

1 core families; 5 direct opponents across 5 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Mmmu Pro: 20.0 observed win share
MiniMax · Source 1

Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

Compare 7 effort levels across 65 benchmark/harness combinations →

Reported effort · Not specified

Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

Not specified: 33 observations

Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

Compare capability profiles →

Score contributions and missing evidence

11 contributing families across 5 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

Model information & shareable badge

Lab: Anthropic
Catalog status: active
Availability: Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
Family: Claude Opus
Released: —
Context: —
License: proprietary
Model card: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/model-deprecations
Default Capability family coverage: /badge/claude-opus-4-7.svg

Benchmark scores & sources

Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

Benchmark	Bucket	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
APEX-Agents · source release snapshot; version not specified	Agentic	37.2% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
BankerToolBench · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	81.3% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
BrowseComp · source release snapshot; version not specified	Agentic	79.3% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
CL-bench · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	22.9% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
Claw-Eval · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	71.6% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
DRACO · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	77.7% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
GDPval rubrics · source release snapshot; version not specified	Agentic	79.8% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
Humanity's Last Exam	Hard reasoning	36.2%	HLE no tools Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	official board	2026-04-22
IMO 2025 · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	17.4% Reported settings & source MiniMax points out of42; comparator percentages as printed First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
KernelBench Hard · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	30.7% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
LiveSQLBench · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	41% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
LMArena Text Arena	Human pref	1494	LMArena Text Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	official board	2026-09-11
LOCA-Bench 256k · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	57% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
MCPAtlas · source release snapshot; version not specified	Agentic	77% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
MMMU-Pro · source release snapshot; version not specified	Multimodal	77% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
NL2Repo · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	56.3% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
OfficeQA Pro · source release snapshot; version not specified	Agentic	43.6% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
OmniDocBench · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	89.3% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
OSWorld Verified · source release snapshot; version not specified	Agentic	82.8% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
PaperBench · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	58.5% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
PostTrainBench · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	42.4% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
SpreadsheetBench v1 · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	88.5% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
SVG-Bench · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	62.3% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
SWE-bench Pro · source release snapshot; version not specified	Coding	64.3% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
SWE-bench Verified · source release snapshot; version not specified	Coding	87.6% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
SWE-fficiency · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	42.2% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
SWEAtlas-QnA · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	45.2% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
SWEAtlas-TestWriting · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	38.21% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
Terminal-Bench 2.1 · 2.1	Coding	66.1% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report MiniMax cites this comparator from the official Terminal-Bench leaderboard; a common protocol with its internal Terminus 2 run is not established. See MiniMax M3 benchmark figure, Terminal-bench 2.1 methodology.	Reviewed 2026-09-06
USAMO 2026 · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	52.8% Reported settings & source MiniMax points out of42; comparator percentages as printed First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
VIBE-V2 · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	55.9% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
VideoMMMU · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	83% Reported settings & source MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
YC-Bench · source release snapshot; version not specified	Supporting evidence	2200000 USD Reported settings & source Launch figure; agent final assets First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-09-06
ARC-AGI-2	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
DeepSWE v1.1	Agentic	—	—	—	—
GDPval-AA	Agentic	—	—	—	—
GPQA Diamond	Hard reasoning	—	—	—	—
LiveCodeBench	Coding	—	—	—	—
MMLU-Pro	Knowledge	—	—	—	—
OSWorld-Verified	Agentic	—	—	—	—
SWE-bench Pro	Agentic	—	—	—	—
SWE-bench Verified	Agentic	—	—	—	—
Terminal-Bench 2.1	Agentic	—	—	—	—