UnifyBench

RankingClaude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7

Compare models

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

34 published benchmark measures · 11 benchmark families contribute across 5 task areas. 4 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Compare with

Choose a second model and its effort to see both profiles and benchmark differences below.

Compare with

Choose a configuration to compare. The overview below combines evidence across settings and has no model-wide rank.

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100
Claude Opus 4.7 capability radarComparison scores from 0 to 100. Unknown capabilities have no point; lines stop at gaps. Hollow points are preliminary. Exact values and support labels follow the chart.AgenticHard reasoningCodingHuman prefKnowledgeMultimodalLong context50100Claude Opus 4.7 · Agentic: 28.7 · SupportedClaude Opus 4.7 · Hard reasoning: 35.4 · PreliminaryClaude Opus 4.7 · Coding: 54.3 · SupportedClaude Opus 4.7 · Multimodal: 3.2 · Preliminary

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

Agentic6 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported28.7

6 core families; 7 direct opponents across 6 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 25.5–32.7; 0/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 27.6–33.3; 1/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: 25.4–35.0; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

  • Browsecomp: 35.7 observed win share
    MiniMax · Source 1
  • Apex Agents: 80.0 observed win share
    MiniMax · Source 1
  • GDPval: 85.7 observed win share
    MiniMax · Source 1
  • OSWorld: 100.0 observed win share
    MiniMax · Source 1
  • OfficeQA: 33.3 observed win share
    MiniMax · Source 1
  • MCP-Atlas: 100.0 observed win share
    MiniMax · Source 1
Hard reasoning1 families · 1 with independent evidence · Preliminary35.4

1 core families; 8 direct opponents across 5 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 6/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

  • Humanity’s Last Exam: 75.0 observed win share
    scale.com · Source 1
Coding2 families · 0 with independent evidence · Supported54.3

2 core families; 7 direct opponents across 6 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 45.4–63.1; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 50.5–60.7; 1/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: 49.5–60.1; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

  • SWE-bench Pro: 100.0 observed win share
    MiniMax · Source 1
  • SWE-bench Verified: 100.0 observed win share
    MiniMax · Source 1
Human pref1 families · 1 with independent evidence · PreliminaryUnknown

1 core families; 76 direct opponents across 17 labs. No connected comparison to the complete reference panel

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

  • Human preference (Arena): 98.7 observed win share
    lmarena.ai · Source 1
KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    Multimodal1 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary3.2

    1 core families; 5 direct opponents across 5 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

    • Mmmu Pro: 20.0 observed win share
      MiniMax · Source 1
    Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

    0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

    Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

    Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

    Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

    Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

      Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

      Reported effort · Not specified

      Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

      Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

      Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence
      Score contributions and missing evidence

      11 contributing families across 5 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

      Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

      Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

      Model information & shareable badge
      Lab
      Anthropic
      Catalog status
      active
      Availability
      Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
      Family
      Claude Opus
      Released
      —
      Context
      —
      License
      proprietary
      Model card
      https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/model-deprecations
      Default Capability family coverage
      Documented-evidence family coverage/badge/claude-opus-4-7.svg
      Benchmark scores & sources

      Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

      BenchmarkBucketScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
      Agents' Last ExamSupporting evidence13.8%Agents' Last Exam · Claude Code

      Effort: Not specified

      		official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		2026-10-20
      Agents' Last ExamSupporting evidence18.4%Agents' Last Exam · ALE-Claw

      Effort: Not specified

      		official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		2026-10-20
      Agents' Last ExamSupporting evidence21.1%Agents' Last Exam · Cursor CLI

      Effort: Not specified

      		official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		2026-10-20
      Agents' Last ExamSupporting evidence13.5%Agents' Last Exam · Droid

      Effort: Not specified

      		official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		2026-10-20
      Agents' Last ExamSupporting evidence15.8%Agents' Last Exam · OpenClaw

      Effort: Not specified

      		official board

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		2026-10-20
      APEX-Agents · source release snapshot; version not specifiedAgentic37.2%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      BankerToolBench · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence81.3%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      BrowseComp · source release snapshot; version not specifiedAgentic79.3%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      CL-bench · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence22.9%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      Claw-Eval · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence71.6%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      DRACO · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence77.7%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      GDPval rubrics · source release snapshot; version not specifiedAgentic79.8%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      Humanity's Last ExamHard reasoning36.2%HLE no tools

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		official board2026-04-22
      IMO 2025 · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence17.4%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax points out of42; comparator percentages as printed

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      KernelBench Hard · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence30.7%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      LiveSQLBench · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence41%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      LMArena Text ArenaHuman pref1494LMArena Text

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		official board2026-10-20
      LOCA-Bench 256k · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence57%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      MCPAtlas · source release snapshot; version not specifiedAgentic77%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      MMMU-Pro · source release snapshot; version not specifiedMultimodal77%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      NL2Repo · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence56.3%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      OfficeQA Pro · source release snapshot; version not specifiedAgentic43.6%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      OmniDocBench · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence89.3%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06
      OSWorld Verified · source release snapshot; version not specifiedAgentic82.8%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      contributes to capability      		lab self-reportReviewed 2026-09-06
      PaperBench · source release snapshot; version not specifiedSupporting evidence58.5%
      Reported settings & source

      MiniMax launch figure methodology. SWE internal ClaudeCode 4 runs; Terminal 8CPU16GB2h128k Terminus2; Paper/PostTrain Ralph-loop12h; GDPval internal rubric grader; BrowseComp discard64k; OSWorld361tasks. Comparator provider/leaderboard scores where footnoted.

      First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

      MiniMax M3 model card benchmark figure · figures/benchmark.jpeg · reviewed 2026-09-06

      		Published configuration

      Effort: Not specified

      		lab self-report

      Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

      		Reviewed 2026-09-06