RankingClaude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6

Data updated 22 Oct 2026

35 published benchmark measures · 5 benchmark families contribute across 3 task areas. 2 capability estimates available in the full profile. See all results ↓ · Compare published benchmarks →

Current configurationSources

Compare with

Choose a second model and its effort to see both profiles and benchmark differences below.

Compare withModel and configuration

Choose a configuration to compare. The overview below combines evidence across settings and has no model-wide rank.

Model evidence summary

This profile combines published settings. It is not a runnable configuration or a leaderboard rank. Compare measured configurations →

Performance profile

Capabilities

Adjusted comparison score · 0–100

Filled points are supported; hollow points are preliminary. Lines stop at unknown capabilities. Exact values and sources follow below.

AgenticNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 13/13 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 15/15 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage; source sensitivity still requires inspection. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Hard reasoning2 families · 0 with independent evidence · Preliminary45.0

2 core families; 5 direct opponents across 5 labs. Needs broader benchmark and opponent support

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 6/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 16/16 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Aime: 100.0 observed win share
Microsoft · Source 1
GPQA: 80.0 observed win share
Microsoft · Source 1

Coding2 families · 2 with independent evidence · Supported12.0

2 core families; 25 direct opponents across 11 labs.

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: 11.6–26.1; 2/6 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: 5.4–25.4; 0/19 unsupported. Smoothing check: 9.6–18.5; 0/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts improved on neutral predictions within evaluated coverage. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

SWE-bench Verified: 94.4 observed win share
Microsoft, swebench.com · Source 1 Source 2
SWE-bench Pro: 29.2 observed win share
Microsoft, labs.scale.com · Source 1 Source 2

Human pref1 families · 1 with independent evidence · PreliminaryUnknown

1 core families; 76 direct opponents across 17 labs. No connected comparison to the complete reference panel

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 1/1 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 1/1 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: cross-family and cross-publisher predictions could not be evaluated from the available comparison network. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Human preference (Arena): 100.0 observed win share
lmarena.ai · Source 1

KnowledgeNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 4/4 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: almost no publisher-held-out comparisons remained estimable. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

MultimodalNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 8/8 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 8/8 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: limited publisher-held-out coverage. Cross-source validity is unresolved. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Long contextNo comparable evidenceUnknown

0 core families; 0 direct opponents across 0 labs. No admitted core comparisons

Estimated against the same complete panel: gpt-5.6-sol claude-opus-4-8 gemini-3.1-pro . Indirect comparisons assume performance can be summarized by one strength within this capability.

Refit without one family: No supported estimate; 5/5 scenarios unsupported. Without one publisher: No supported estimate; 5/5 unsupported. Smoothing check: No supported estimate; 3/3 unsupported. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals.

Audit: family and publisher holdouts underperformed neutral predictions. Treat this as an exploratory estimate. Validation audit.

Matched family win shares below describe source evidence; they are not averaged to produce the adjusted score.

Scores estimate outcomes against a shared reference panel; they are not accuracy percentages. Sparse or disconnected evidence cannot qualify an overall profile. Open a capability to inspect its evidence.

Reported effort · Max + unspecified

Settings reported in this model's published benchmark results, including results outside the aggregate. Effort names are provider-specific. These are not API defaults or equal compute budgets.

Max: 32 observations
Not specified: 9 observations

Mixed settings means multiple settings occur in the evidence. Best across efforts means the source selected its best reported result across settings; it does not mean Max. Unspecified settings stay unknown. This model-summary chart combines reported settings. The leaderboard keeps identified configurations separate and excludes unknown effort.

Inspect each result and its source ↓ · Download effort evidence

Score contributions and missing evidence

5 contributing families across 3 capabilities. Fixed reference panels do not change when the catalog expands.

Capability is fitted jointly across families. Capability estimates below describe different task areas; their weighted sum is not the Capability score.

Results without reviewed compatibility or a reference match remain in the raw evidence below. Coverage counts only contributing results.

Model information & shareable badge

Lab: Anthropic
Catalog status: active
Availability: Public provider catalog; account and region restrictions may apply
Family: Claude Opus
Released: —
Context: —
License: proprietary
Model card: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/model-deprecations
Default Capability family coverage: /badge/claude-opus-4-6.svg

Benchmark scores & sources

Original results, evaluation harnesses, and evidence behind this model.

Benchmark	Bucket	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
AIME 2025 · source release snapshot; version not specified	Hard reasoning	99.8% Reported settings & source MAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
AIME 2026	Hard reasoning	96.7% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, AIME 2026. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Reasoning: 98304 generation tokens; HLE full set. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, AIME 2026, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
APEX-Agents	Agentic	33% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, APEX-Agents. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, APEX-Agents, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
BabyVision	Supporting evidence	14.8% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, BabyVision. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Vision: 98304 tokens, average of three runs; Python condition uses 65536 tokens per step, at most50steps. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, BabyVision, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
BabyVision (w/ python)	Supporting evidence	38.4% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, BabyVision (w/ python). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Vision: 98304 tokens, average of three runs; Python condition uses 65536 tokens per step, at most50steps. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Own measurement or explicitly starred same-condition re-evaluation. Assess benchmark-specific protocol before admission. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, BabyVision (w/ python), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-10-18
BrowseComp	Agentic	83.7% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, BrowseComp. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, BrowseComp, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
BrowseComp (Agent Swarm)	Agentic	83.7% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, BrowseComp (Agent Swarm). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, BrowseComp (Agent Swarm), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
CharXiv (RQ)	Multimodal	69.1% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, CharXiv (RQ). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Vision: 98304 tokens, average of three runs; Python condition uses 65536 tokens per step, at most50steps. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, CharXiv (RQ), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
CharXiv (RQ) (w/ python)	Supporting evidence	84.7% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, CharXiv (RQ) (w/ python). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Vision: 98304 tokens, average of three runs; Python condition uses 65536 tokens per step, at most50steps. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, CharXiv (RQ) (w/ python), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
Claw Eval (pass@3)	Supporting evidence	82.4% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, Claw Eval (pass@3). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, Claw Eval (pass@3), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
Claw Eval (pass^3)	Supporting evidence	70.4% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, Claw Eval (pass^3). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, Claw Eval (pass^3), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
DeepSearchQA (accuracy)	Supporting evidence	80.6% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, DeepSearchQA (accuracy). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, DeepSearchQA (accuracy), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
DeepSearchQA (f1-score)	Supporting evidence	91.3% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, DeepSearchQA (f1-score). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, DeepSearchQA (f1-score), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
GPQA Diamond · source release snapshot; version not specified	Hard reasoning	91.3% Reported settings & source MAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06	Published configuration Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	lab self-report	Reviewed 2026-09-06
GPQA-Diamond	Supporting evidence	91.3% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, GPQA-Diamond. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Reasoning: 98304 generation tokens; HLE full set. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, GPQA-Diamond, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
HLE-Full	Hard reasoning	40% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, HLE-Full. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Reasoning: 98304 generation tokens; HLE full set. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, HLE-Full, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
HLE-Full (w/ tools)	Hard reasoning	53% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, HLE-Full (w/ tools). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, HLE-Full (w/ tools), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
HMMT 2026 (Feb)	Supporting evidence	96.2% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, HMMT 2026 (Feb). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Reasoning: 98304 generation tokens; HLE full set. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, HMMT 2026 (Feb), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
IMO-AnswerBench	Supporting evidence	75.3% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, IMO-AnswerBench. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Reasoning: 98304 generation tokens; HLE full set. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, IMO-AnswerBench, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
LiveCodeBench (v6)	Coding	88.8% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, LiveCodeBench (v6). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Coding: average of ten runs; Terminal uses Terminus2 preserve-thinking; SWE uses in-house SWE-agent. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, LiveCodeBench (v6), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18
LMArena Text Arena	Human pref	1497	LMArena Text Effort: Not specified contributes to capability	official board	2026-10-20
MathVision	Supporting evidence	71.2% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, MathVision. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Vision: 98304 tokens, average of three runs; Python condition uses 65536 tokens per step, at most50steps. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Own measurement or explicitly starred same-condition re-evaluation. Assess benchmark-specific protocol before admission. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, MathVision, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-10-18
MathVision (w/ python)	Supporting evidence	84.6% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, MathVision (w/ python). Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Vision: 98304 tokens, average of three runs; Python condition uses 65536 tokens per step, at most50steps. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Own measurement or explicitly starred same-condition re-evaluation. Assess benchmark-specific protocol before admission. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, MathVision (w/ python), column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-10-18
MCPMark	Supporting evidence	56.7% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, MCPMark. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Own measurement or explicitly starred same-condition re-evaluation. Assess benchmark-specific protocol before admission. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, MCPMark, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core	Reviewed 2026-10-18
MMMU-Pro	Multimodal	73.9% Reported settings & source Kimi K2.6 card, MMMU-Pro. Thinking mode; temperature 1.0, top-p 1.0, context 262144. Comparator settings: GPT-5.4 xhigh, Opus4.6 max, Gemini3.1Pro high. See benchmark-specific footnotes. Only own K2.6 and starred re-evaluations can form new comparisons. Vision: 98304 tokens, average of three runs; Python condition uses 65536 tokens per step, at most50steps. Source SHA256 95db3be1d0473e482c7aa901f237ad7af8bb7929625a777b27428081bb8ea9f7. Cited from another official report; does not establish a new same-protocol evaluation. Comparison limit: Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run. Kimi K2.6 official model card · Evaluation Results table, MMMU-Pro, column 4 · reviewed 2026-10-18	Published configuration Effort: Max	lab self-report Cited comparator requires original evaluation provenance; not a new matched run.	Reviewed 2026-10-18