RankingEffort benchmarks
Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct effort benchmarks
Compare measured Low, Medium, High and other settings. Every number keeps its source.
Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct
2 measured results · 1 reported effort labels · 2 benchmark/harness combinations. Model evidence and sources →
Capability score evidence
Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct · Unspecified: No connected estimate. No admitted path to the complete configuration reference panel
Which sources carry the weight?
These shares describe the comparisons entering the fit, not fractions of the final score.
What evidence is missing from the fit?
Across all collected settings for this model: 2 observations, 0 contributing, 0 matched without graph weight and 2 excluded. Counts do not establish rank eligibility.
- 2 · Effort is not identified
Capability profile
One configuration, seven capabilities
- ALlama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct · Unspecified0 of 7 capabilities supported
Gaps are unknown, not zero. Hollow points are preliminary.
Agentic
UnknownHard reasoning
UnknownCoding
UnknownHuman pref
UnknownKnowledge
UnknownMultimodal
UnknownLong context
Unknown
Each profile belongs to the named configuration. Capability scores use a shared panel for all axes, distinct from the overall ranking panel; they are not accuracy percentages or direct head-to-head wins.
Compare this configuration →Explore the model evidence profile →
| Benchmark / source | Unspecified |
|---|---|
Epoch · GPQA diamond · v1.0.0Benchmark detailsEpoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12. | 41.04% Reported settingsEpoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.0; scorer choice; model=Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct; run=9SSHEP95FYVZvHDdoHSRy3; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv |
Epoch · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · v1.0.0Benchmark detailsEpoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12. | 2.64% Reported settingsEpoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.0; scorer model_graded; model=Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-Instruct; run=LHRL6nQJZXGJmYppR7kbGw; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv |
What these comparisons mean
Each source reports its own effort labels. Matching labels do not establish equal compute budgets or identical fallback behavior. Open Reported settings to inspect the exact model name, agent and task coverage. Multiple results at one level remain visible rather than selecting the best. Source-reported None or Non-reasoning labels are not treated as evidence that an API supports those settings.
These measurements use their own dated source collection. The leaderboard fits identified configurations jointly; it contains no pooled model ratings. Explicit thinking budgets are separate configurations. Read the methodology.
Download all effort benchmark results · 7,424 results across 240 models · Collected 2026-09-12