RankingEffort benchmarks

Gemini 3.6 Flash effort benchmarks

Compare measured Low, Medium, High and other settings. Every number keeps its source.

Model

Gemini 3.6 Flash

74 measured results · 4 reported effort labels · 60 benchmark/harness combinations. Model evidence and sources →

Capability score evidence

Gemini 3.6 Flash · High: 39.1 overall comparison score. Meets the overall evidence requirements.

Which sources carry the weight?

Datacurve · 15.2% direct comparison weight · independent
Artificial Analysis · 15.1% direct comparison weight · independent
Vals AI · 15.0% direct comparison weight · independent
LiveBench · 14.6% direct comparison weight · independent
ARC Prize · 14.3% direct comparison weight · independent
Epoch AI · 14.1% direct comparison weight · independent
Cognition · 11.6% direct comparison weight · independent

These shares describe the comparisons entering the fit, not fractions of the final score.

How sensitive is this score?

Remove one evaluator or family and refit the graph against the same overall panel. Values use the matching dataset audited 2026-09-12. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals; ranking eligibility may also change.

Removed evidence	Recomputed score	Change
Artificial Analysis	38.9	-0.2
ARC Prize	41.1	+2.0
Datacurve	37.3	-1.8
LiveCodeBench	39.1	+0.0
Scale	40.4	+1.3
Terminal-Bench	38.9	-0.1
Cognition	39.1	+0.0
LiveBench	39.5	+0.5
SWE-rebench	38.6	-0.4
Epoch AI	38.8	-0.2
Vals AI	38.0	-1.0
Provider reports · Anthropic	39.0	-0.0
Provider reports · Moonshot AI	39.0	-0.1
Provider reports · Meta	39.1	+0.0
Provider reports · Mistral	39.1	+0.0
All provider reports	39.0	-0.1

Every benchmark family

Removed evidence	Recomputed score	Change
arc-agi	40.9	+1.9
deepswe	37.3	-1.8
mmmu-pro	40.0	+0.9
frontiermath	40.0	+0.9
vals-finance-agent	38.4	-0.6
gpqa	38.5	-0.6
livebench-instructions	38.5	-0.5
hle	39.6	+0.5
livebench-data	39.5	+0.5
vals-legal-research	39.5	+0.4
swe-rebench	38.6	-0.4
livebench-language	38.6	-0.4
livebench-math	39.4	+0.4
simpleqa	38.7	-0.4
vals-excel-modeling	38.7	-0.3
vals-code-migration	39.4	+0.3
epoch-game-puzzles	38.8	-0.3
multi-swe-bench	39.3	+0.3
swe-atlas-qna	38.8	-0.2
ifbench	38.9	-0.2
vibe-code	39.2	+0.2
aime	39.2	+0.2
mmlu-pro	39.2	+0.1
terminal-bench	38.9	-0.1
automationbench	38.9	-0.1
livebench-reasoning	38.9	-0.1
critpt	39.2	+0.1
arc-agi-3	38.9	-0.1
swe-atlas-test-writing	38.9	-0.1
tau-bench	38.9	-0.1
briefcase	39.2	+0.1
livebench-coding	39.0	-0.1
harvey	39.0	-0.1
enigma-eval	39.1	+0.1
apex-agents	39.1	+0.1
gdp-pdf	39.1	+0.0
itbench	39.0	-0.0
omniscience	39.1	+0.0
swe-atlas-refactoring	39.0	-0.0
aa-lcr	39.1	+0.0
scicode	39.1	+0.0
gdpval	39.1	+0.0
livecodebench	39.1	+0.0
gmmlu	39.1	+0.0
frontiercode	39.1	+0.0
math500	39.1	+0.0
swe-bench-pro	39.1	+0.0
enterprise-ops	39.0	-0.0
analyst-agent	39.1	+0.0

What evidence is missing from the fit?

Across all collected settings for this model: 76 observations, 73 contributing, 0 matched without graph weight and 3 excluded. Counts do not establish rank eligibility.

1 · Benchmark family or source protocol has not been reviewed
2 · No reviewed effort for this catalog observation; any separately collected effort measurement is counted separately

Inspect every observation and exclusion →

Capability profile

One configuration, seven capabilities

Comparison score · 0–100

AGemini 3.6 Flash · High4 of 7 capabilities supported

Gaps are unknown, not zero. Hollow points are preliminary.

Agentic
A41.6Supported
Hard reasoning
A41.8Supported
Coding
A38.6Supported
Human pref
Unknown
Knowledge
A60.8Supported
Multimodal
A56.5Preliminary
Long context
A45.8Preliminary

Each profile belongs to the named configuration. Capability scores use a shared panel for all axes, distinct from the overall ranking panel; they are not accuracy percentages or direct head-to-head wins.

Compare this configuration →Explore the model evidence profile →

These are published benchmark scores. Supported effort estimates also appear on the Capability leaderboard. Results from different harnesses occupy different rows. Missing cells stay unknown; no scores are copied between effort levels.

Benchmark / source	Minimal	Low	Medium	High
AA-Briefcase EloArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: elo. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	952.75 Elo Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
AA-LCR v1.1Artificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	80% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
AutomationBench-AAArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of task objectives completed with no guardrail violations · Higher is better · Benchmark developed by Zapier · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	53.02% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
CritPtArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Benchmark developed by Argonne and UIUC, with contributions from 60+ researchers globally · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	10.57% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
GDP.pdf: All-passArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of attempts where every atomic criterion passed · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	17.4% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
GDPval-AA v2 LeaderboardArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Elo rating for performance on real-world work tasks · Anchored to a human baseline of 1,000 · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: elo. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	1,331.37 Elo Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
GPQA DiamondArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	92.83% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
Harvey LAB-AA: Criterion Pass RateArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of atomic pass/fail rubric criteria the deliverables satisfy, graded by a single LLM judge · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	85.15% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	40.82% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
MLCR-AAArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of tasks judged accurate, complete, and concise · Expert + compound (hard) sets · Benchmark developed by Wisedocs · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	14.44% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
MMMU-ProArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	83.24% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
AA-Omniscience IndexArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: index. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	22.13 Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
AA-Omniscience AccuracyArtificial Analysis · 6000 questions; 1 attempt; correct-answer share; GPT-5.6 Luna medium grader Benchmark details AA-Omniscience Accuracy (higher is better) measures the proportion of correctly answered questions out of all questions, regardless of whether the model chooses to answer · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	49.97% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
SciCodeArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	53.36% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
𝜏³-BankingArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Benchmark developed by Sierra Research · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	29.9% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
Terminal-Bench v2.1Artificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Benchmark developed by the Laude Institute and open-source contributors · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	77.53% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
Terminal-Bench v4.0Artificial Analysis · mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6; 66 tasks; pass@1 averaged over 3 repeats; 500 steps; task timeout up to 8 hours Benchmark details Benchmark developed by the Laude Institute, Stanford, and open-source contributors · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	7.07% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-6-flash
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize · v2 Semi-Private Benchmark details Original public board. Configuration and task coverage may differ; inspect source. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	2.64% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (Minimal); Source model ID: gemini-3-6-flash-minimal; 120 tasks	30.42% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (Low); Source model ID: gemini-3-6-flash-low; 120 tasks	50.42% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (Medium); Source model ID: gemini-3-6-flash-medium; 120 tasks	60.42% Reported settings Gemini 3.6 Flash (High); Source model ID: gemini-3-6-flash-high; 120 tasks
DeepSWE v1.1Datacurve · mini-swe-agent Benchmark details Original public board. Configuration and task coverage may differ; inspect source. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	46.7% Reported settings gemini-3-6-flash; Reported effort: high; 113 unique tasks; 452 attempts; 4 runs
FrontierCode 1.1 · extended-chiselCognition · chisel Benchmark details FrontierCode 1.1; chisel. Open each result for its exact effort, task subset, metric and protocol details. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	32.77% Reported settings FrontierCode 1.1; extended; 150 tasks; chisel; source effort low; weighted rubric score, not pass rate; unfair internet runs zeroed by evaluator; flag rate 0	48.02% Reported settings FrontierCode 1.1; extended; 150 tasks; chisel; source effort medium; weighted rubric score, not pass rate; unfair internet runs zeroed by evaluator; flag rate 0	47.58% Reported settings FrontierCode 1.1; extended; 150 tasks; chisel; source effort high; weighted rubric score, not pass rate; unfair internet runs zeroed by evaluator; flag rate 0
FrontierCode 1.1 · main-chiselCognition · chisel Benchmark details FrontierCode 1.1; chisel. Open each result for its exact effort, task subset, metric and protocol details. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	22.82% Reported settings FrontierCode 1.1; main; 100 tasks; chisel; source effort low; weighted rubric score, not pass rate; unfair internet runs zeroed by evaluator; flag rate 0	34.37% Reported settings FrontierCode 1.1; main; 100 tasks; chisel; source effort medium; weighted rubric score, not pass rate; unfair internet runs zeroed by evaluator; flag rate 0	33.69% Reported settings FrontierCode 1.1; main; 100 tasks; chisel; source effort high; weighted rubric score, not pass rate; unfair internet runs zeroed by evaluator; flag rate 0
LiveBench · AMPS Hard · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	98% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-AMPS_Hard; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · code completion · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	78.26% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-code_completion; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · code generation · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	77.47% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-code_generation; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · connections · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	100% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-connections; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · consecutive events · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	43.82% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-consecutive_events; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · integrals with game · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	63% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-integrals_with_game; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · javascript · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	63.64% Reported settings LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit; livebench-2026-06-25-javascript; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · logic with navigation · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	76% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-logic_with_navigation; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · math comp · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	94.12% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-math_comp; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · olympiad · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	90.49% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-olympiad; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · paraphrase · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	74.32% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-paraphrase; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · plot unscrambling · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	63.69% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-plot_unscrambling; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · python · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	40% Reported settings LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit; livebench-2026-06-25-python; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · simplify · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	75.7% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-simplify; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · spatial · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	100% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-spatial; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · story generation · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	75.6% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-story_generation; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · summarize · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	75.85% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-summarize; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · tablejoin · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	47.14% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-tablejoin; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · tablereformat · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	98.04% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-tablereformat; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · theory of mind · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	78.85% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-theory_of_mind; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · typescript · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	26.67% Reported settings LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit; livebench-2026-06-25-typescript; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · typos · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	88% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-typos; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
LiveBench · zebra puzzle · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	85.75% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-zebra_puzzle; gemini-3.6-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.6-flash
Epoch · Chess Puzzles · v1.1.6Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	35% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal; run=hL24cexf97QKVLsv73H5TT; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	43% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.6-flash_low; run=DLvSYBHHLcHECeL5SpNgVK; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	Not reported	40% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.6-flash_high; run=aMtSkxyLZPdf6o6f5zLP6A; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · FrontierMath Tier 4 · v2.0.0Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 2.0.0; scorer verification_code Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. FrontierMath was developed with OpenAI funding and unequal access to part of the question set; this result is from Epoch's evaluation. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	21.95% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 2.0.0; scorer verification_code; model=gemini-3.6-flash_high; run=JCMjXU6FRiiLV3xvs9R2Xv; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 · v2.0.0Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 2.0.0; scorer verification_code Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. FrontierMath was developed with OpenAI funding and unequal access to part of the question set; this result is from Epoch's evaluation. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	58.95% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 2.0.0; scorer verification_code; model=gemini-3.6-flash_high; run=nb9LnDeeQyvRCqsbsTANGD; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · GPQA diamond · v1.0.11Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.11; scorer choice Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	85.86% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.11; scorer choice; model=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal; run=aPmR8fV49N98a6NVKpASAf; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	86.36% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.11; scorer choice; model=gemini-3.6-flash_low; run=JoraLb9y55QXpMg4Rrmr5x; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	Not reported	94.13% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.11; scorer choice; model=gemini-3.6-flash_high; run=86SY5JbPB49xXhHFQW6tHu; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · Mystery Game Puzzles · v1.0.4 · Tool submissionEpoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer agent_submitted_next_move_scorer Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	30% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer agent_submitted_next_move_scorer; model=gemini-3.6-flash_high; run=YBqiCXPjMUSAgAjDUoz5sy; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · Mystery Game Puzzles · v1.0.4 · Exact moveEpoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer exact_match_next_move_scorer Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	25% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer exact_match_next_move_scorer; model=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal; run=3L22tfAid5ZM42p92tqC73; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	23% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer exact_match_next_move_scorer; model=gemini-3.6-flash_low; run=M8sY8vHnvSLxQUg3HTMTCp; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	Not reported	Not reported
Epoch · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · v1.1.6Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	80% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal; run=cF97JqHbFxxp7ePjYVK9HV; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	82.22% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.6-flash_low; run=6iEkMa88YjLDgcde4bLm8B; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	Not reported	94.17% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.6-flash_high; run=ajQFZGMjvyMTH2ULDZhwtz; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · SimpleQA Verified · v1.2.0Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.2.0; scorer simpleqa_scorer Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	66.2% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.2.0; scorer simpleqa_scorer; model=gemini-3.6-flash_high; run=F83pa7Gfsb4UNVttTnS5Hk; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Vals AI · Finance Agent v2Vals AI · Vals FAB v2 shared six-tool harness; two-hour task limit Benchmark details Overall weighted rubric accuracy, averaged over three runs on 450 tasks. Dealbreaker failures and timeouts score zero. Related categories and all-pass scores are not additional votes. Three-model judge panel; private test set. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	56.3% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.6-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.6-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Code Migration v1Vals AI · Vals Code Migration shared agent harness Benchmark details Hidden behavior-test pass rate, equally weighted across 40 repositories (30 CLI and 10 COBOL-to-Java). Anti-cheat failures score zero. Code-quality ratings and language splits are not additional votes. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	30.93% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.6-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.6-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Legal Research Bench v1Vals AI · Vals Legal Research shared five-tool harness; three-hour task limit Benchmark details All-pass accuracy on 208 private legal research tasks. Every expert rubric check must pass; GPT-5.4 judges responses. Partial-credit scores and practice-area splits are not additional votes. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	25% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.6-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.6-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Excel Modeling Benchmark v1Vals AI · Vals EMB shared workbook agent harness; 3.5-hour task limit Benchmark details Mean of seven equally weighted task categories. Template submissions use recalculated Excel cell accuracy; scratch submissions use rubric checks judged by GPT-5.4 Mini XHigh. Partial credit does not mean task completion. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	65.41% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.6-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.6-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · MMLU-Pro v1Vals AI · Vals MMLU-Pro five-shot chain-of-thought; regex answer grading Benchmark details Mean accuracy across 14 subjects under Vals five-shot prompting. Subject splits share one family and are not additional votes. Vals labels this benchmark archived; it is historical corroboration, not ongoing frontier evaluation. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	89.28% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.6-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.6-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-01","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Terminal-Bench 2.1Vals AI · Vals Terminus 2 harness; pass@1 on 89 tasks Benchmark details Overall task pass rate under the shared Terminus 2 configuration. All task tests must pass. Difficulty splits share one family. Fable 5 and Opus 5 mixed-checkpoint fallback runs are excluded. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	73.78% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.6-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.6-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Vibe Code Bench v1.1Vals AI · Vals modified OpenHands harness; five hours or 1,000 turns per app Benchmark details Mean app test pass rate on the canonical v1.1 test set. Browser Use executes workflow tests; each test requires at least 90% of its substeps. Automated judging can introduce error. Alternate agents are excluded. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	64.01% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.6-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.6-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":"OpenHands"}
Vals AI · Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark v1Vals AI · Vals Harvey held-out legal file-work protocol; internet disabled Benchmark details Mean task resolution across two judges (GPT-5.5 Medium and Sonnet 4.6), requiring every criterion to pass. Criteria pass rates and practice-area splits do not add votes. Shared Harvey family; Fable 5 fallback run excluded. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	3.33% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.6-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.6-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}

What these comparisons mean

Each source reports its own effort labels. Matching labels do not establish equal compute budgets or identical fallback behavior. Open Reported settings to inspect the exact model name, agent and task coverage. Multiple results at one level remain visible rather than selecting the best. Source-reported None or Non-reasoning labels are not treated as evidence that an API supports those settings.

These measurements use their own dated source collection. The leaderboard fits identified configurations jointly; it contains no pooled model ratings. Explicit thinking budgets are separate configurations. Read the methodology.

Download all effort benchmark results · 7,424 results across 240 models · Collected 2026-09-12

Gemini 3.6 Flash effort benchmarks

Gemini 3.6 Flash

Capability score evidence

One configuration, seven capabilities

Agentic

Hard reasoning

Coding

Human pref

Knowledge

Multimodal

Long context