RankingEffort benchmarks

Gemini 3.5 Flash effort benchmarks

Compare measured Low, Medium, High and other settings. Every number keeps its source.

Model

Gemini 3.5 Flash

94 measured results · 4 reported effort labels · 69 benchmark/harness combinations. Model evidence and sources →

Capability score evidence

Gemini 3.5 Flash · High: 39.8 overall comparison score. Meets the overall evidence requirements.

Which sources carry the weight?

Datacurve · 15.2% direct comparison weight · independent
ARC Prize · 15.2% direct comparison weight · independent
Artificial Analysis · 15.1% direct comparison weight · independent
Vals AI · 15.0% direct comparison weight · independent
LiveBench · 14.6% direct comparison weight · independent
Epoch AI · 13.3% direct comparison weight · independent
Scale · 11.7% direct comparison weight · independent

These shares describe the comparisons entering the fit, not fractions of the final score.

How sensitive is this score?

Remove one evaluator or family and refit the graph against the same overall panel. Values use the matching dataset audited 2026-09-12. These are sensitivity checks, not confidence intervals; ranking eligibility may also change.

Removed evidence	Recomputed score	Change
Artificial Analysis	39.6	-0.2
ARC Prize	39.6	-0.2
Datacurve	41.3	+1.4
LiveCodeBench	39.8	-0.0
Scale	42.0	+2.2
Terminal-Bench	39.9	+0.0
Cognition	41.0	+1.2
LiveBench	39.9	+0.1
SWE-rebench	39.7	-0.1
Epoch AI	37.8	-2.1
Vals AI	38.7	-1.2
Provider reports · Anthropic	39.8	-0.0
Provider reports · Moonshot AI	39.8	-0.1
Provider reports · Meta	39.9	+0.0
Provider reports · Mistral	39.8	+0.0
All provider reports	39.8	-0.1

Every benchmark family

Removed evidence	Recomputed score	Change
deepswe	41.3	+1.4
frontiermath	41.1	+1.3
frontiercode	41.0	+1.2
epoch-game-puzzles	38.8	-1.1
enigma-eval	40.8	+1.0
mmmu-pro	40.8	+0.9
vals-finance-agent	39.0	-0.8
swe-atlas-test-writing	40.3	+0.5
livebench-data	40.3	+0.4
vals-code-migration	40.3	+0.4
hle	39.4	-0.4
livebench-language	39.4	-0.4
arc-agi	39.4	-0.4
simpleqa	39.4	-0.4
vibe-code	40.2	+0.4
livebench-instructions	39.5	-0.4
vals-legal-research	40.2	+0.3
livebench-reasoning	40.1	+0.3
harvey	40.1	+0.3
enterprise-ops	39.6	-0.3
swe-atlas-qna	40.0	+0.2
apex-agents	39.7	-0.2
briefcase	40.0	+0.2
vals-excel-modeling	39.7	-0.2
swe-rebench	39.7	-0.1
ifbench	39.7	-0.1
arc-agi-3	39.7	-0.1
critpt	40.0	+0.1
analyst-agent	39.7	-0.1
gpqa	39.8	-0.1
aime	39.9	+0.1
tau-bench	39.8	-0.1
gdpval	39.9	+0.1
mmlu-pro	39.8	-0.1
omniscience	39.9	+0.1
livebench-math	39.9	+0.1
itbench	39.8	-0.0
scicode	39.9	+0.0
livebench-coding	39.8	-0.0
aa-lcr	39.9	+0.0
gdp-pdf	39.9	+0.0
multi-swe-bench	39.9	+0.0
terminal-bench	39.8	-0.0
automationbench	39.8	-0.0
swe-atlas-refactoring	39.8	-0.0
gmmlu	39.9	+0.0
math500	39.9	+0.0
livecodebench	39.9	+0.0
swe-bench-pro	39.9	+0.0

What evidence is missing from the fit?

Across all collected settings for this model: 100 observations, 89 contributing, 0 matched without graph weight and 11 excluded. Counts do not establish rank eligibility.

3 · Benchmark family or source protocol has not been reviewed
2 · Fewer than two distinct model identities remain in this evaluation
4 · No reviewed effort for this catalog observation; any separately collected effort measurement is counted separately
2 · Supporting evidence outside the reviewed capability core

Inspect every observation and exclusion →

Capability profile

One configuration, seven capabilities

Comparison score · 0–100

AGemini 3.5 Flash · High4 of 7 capabilities supported

Gaps are unknown, not zero. Hollow points are preliminary.

Agentic
A44.9Supported
Hard reasoning
A46.8Supported
Coding
A34.4Supported
Human pref
Unknown
Knowledge
A62.3Supported
Multimodal
A59.3Preliminary
Long context
A47.0Preliminary

Each profile belongs to the named configuration. Capability scores use a shared panel for all axes, distinct from the overall ranking panel; they are not accuracy percentages or direct head-to-head wins.

Compare this configuration →Explore the model evidence profile →

These are published benchmark scores. Supported effort estimates also appear on the Capability leaderboard. Results from different harnesses occupy different rows. Missing cells stay unknown; no scores are copied between effort levels.

Benchmark / source	Minimal	Low	Medium	High
AA-AnalystAgentArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of tasks solved on all 5 of 5 attempts · 80 tasks, 5 attempts per task · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	45% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
AA-Briefcase EloArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: elo. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	870.71 Elo Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	869.74 Elo Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
APEX-Agents-AAArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	47.05% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
AA-LCR v1.1Artificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	61.33% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	74.33% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	73.33% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
AutomationBench-AAArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of task objectives completed with no guardrail violations · Higher is better · Benchmark developed by Zapier · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	42.08% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
CritPtArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Benchmark developed by Argonne and UIUC, with contributions from 60+ researchers globally · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	1.43% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	10.86% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	13.14% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
EnterpriseOps-Gym-AAArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Overall task success rate across all eight enterprise domains (oracle tool mode) · Benchmark developed by ServiceNow Research · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	50.07% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
GDP.pdf: All-passArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of attempts where every atomic criterion passed · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	19.8% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
GDPval-AA v2 LeaderboardArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Elo rating for performance on real-world work tasks · Anchored to a human baseline of 1,000 · Higher is better · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: elo. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	1,259.06 Elo Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
GPQA DiamondArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	82.83% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	92.12% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	92.22% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
Harvey LAB-AA: Criterion Pass RateArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of atomic pass/fail rubric criteria the deliverables satisfy, graded by a single LLM judge · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	82.08% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	24.1% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	41.33% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	42.68% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
IFBenchArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	47.28% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	74.56% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	76.33% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
ITBench-AAArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Combined public and private Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) tasks · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	40.35% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
MLCR-AAArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Share of tasks judged accurate, complete, and concise · Expert + compound (hard) sets · Benchmark developed by Wisedocs · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	18.33% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
MMMU-ProArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	80.12% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	83.87% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	84.28% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
AA-Omniscience IndexArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct. · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: index. Source collected 2026-09-12.	0.67 Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	20.82 Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	21.18 Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
AA-Omniscience AccuracyArtificial Analysis · 6000 questions; 1 attempt; correct-answer share; GPT-5.6 Luna medium grader Benchmark details AA-Omniscience Accuracy (higher is better) measures the proportion of correctly answered questions out of all questions, regardless of whether the model chooses to answer · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	43.02% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	51.05% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	51.4% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
SciCodeArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	53.94% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
𝜏²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	58.77% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	95.61% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	95.32% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
𝜏³-BankingArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Benchmark developed by Sierra Research · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	32.16% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
Terminal-Bench HardArtificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	46.21% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-minimal	Not reported	39.39% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (medium); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash-medium	40.91% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
Terminal-Bench v2.1Artificial Analysis · Artificial Analysis published evaluation; see source for benchmark-specific settings Benchmark details Benchmark developed by the Laude Institute and open-source contributors · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	78.65% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
Terminal-Bench v4.0Artificial Analysis · mini-SWE-agent v2.4.6; 66 tasks; pass@1 averaged over 3 repeats; 500 steps; task timeout up to 8 hours Benchmark details Benchmark developed by the Laude Institute, Stanford, and open-source contributors · Independently benchmarked by Artificial Analysis · Evaluation results measured independently by Artificial Analysis Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	6.57% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (high); Model source: https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/gemini-3-5-flash
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize · v2 Semi-Private Benchmark details Original public board. Configuration and task coverage may differ; inspect source. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	8.89% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (Minimal); Source model ID: gemini-3-5-flash-minimal; 120 tasks	Not reported	Not reported	72.08% Reported settings Gemini 3.5 Flash (High); Source model ID: gemini-3-5-flash-high; 120 tasks
DeepSWE v1.1Datacurve · mini-swe-agent Benchmark details Original public board. Configuration and task coverage may differ; inspect source. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	36.1% Reported settings gemini-3-5-flash; Reported effort: high; 113 unique tasks; 452 attempts; 4 runs
EnigmaEval · Scale official evaluationScale · Scale official evaluation Benchmark details Scale EnigmaEval puzzle-hunt accuracy; source-reported reasoning effort. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	25.41% Reported settings Scale EnigmaEval puzzle-hunt accuracy; source-reported reasoning effort.; published row 2025-11-19T23:53:27.000Z; reported margin ±2.45 percentage points; No contamination annotation reported (not proof of absence)
LiveBench · AMPS Hard · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	98% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-AMPS_Hard; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · code completion · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	76.09% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-code_completion; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · code generation · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	80.28% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-code_generation; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · connections · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	100% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-connections; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · consecutive events · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	47.99% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-consecutive_events; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · integrals with game · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	68% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-integrals_with_game; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · javascript · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	63.64% Reported settings LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit; livebench-2026-06-25-javascript; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · logic with navigation · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	74% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-logic_with_navigation; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · math comp · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	95.1% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-math_comp; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · olympiad · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	91.88% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-olympiad; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · paraphrase · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	75.52% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-paraphrase; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · plot unscrambling · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	67.75% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-plot_unscrambling; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · python · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	50% Reported settings LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit; livebench-2026-06-25-python; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · simplify · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	69.1% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-simplify; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · spatial · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	96% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-spatial; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · story generation · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	75.2% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-story_generation; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · summarize · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	82.58% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-summarize; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · tablejoin · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	50.5% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-tablejoin; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · tablereformat · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	96.08% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-tablereformat; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · theory of mind · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	80.77% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-theory_of_mind; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · typescript · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	33.33% Reported settings LiveBench Mini-SWE-Agent, 250-step limit; livebench-2026-06-25-typescript; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · typos · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	86% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-typos; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
LiveBench · zebra puzzle · 2026-06-25LiveBench · LiveBench official task evaluation Benchmark details LiveBench 2026-06-25 task snapshot. Task scores stay separate and related tasks share their reviewed family budget. Explicit checkpoint and effort labels only. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	77.25% Reported settings LiveBench official task evaluation; livebench-2026-06-25-zebra_puzzle; gemini-3.5-flash-high; checkpoint=gemini-3.5-flash
Epoch · Chess Puzzles · v1.1.4Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.4; scorer model_extracted_exact_match Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	50% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.4; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.5-flash_high; run=imPXZhfTfq9Q9G2kq3stdg; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · Chess Puzzles · v1.1.6Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	43% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.5-flash_minimal; run=hYeysTWbJLkxwBrENz3Kie; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	45% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.5-flash_low; run=dQhoYvW3Wz2eZSZ89K6igd; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	Not reported	Not reported
Epoch · FrontierMath Tier 4 · v2.0.0Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 2.0.0; scorer verification_code Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. FrontierMath was developed with OpenAI funding and unequal access to part of the question set; this result is from Epoch's evaluation. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	26.83% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 2.0.0; scorer verification_code; model=gemini-3.5-flash_high; run=cXn5zzns6VFwbTgotDwZjV; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 · v2.0.0Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 2.0.0; scorer verification_code Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. FrontierMath was developed with OpenAI funding and unequal access to part of the question set; this result is from Epoch's evaluation. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	62.81% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 2.0.0; scorer verification_code; model=gemini-3.5-flash_high; run=72DQVwbYiQW5pjhshjBaGU; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · GPQA diamond · v1.0.11Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.11; scorer choice Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	86.36% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.11; scorer choice; model=gemini-3.5-flash_minimal; run=QDZRoAVaEDtdS6nECEeE35; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	88.89% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.11; scorer choice; model=gemini-3.5-flash_low; run=eiTYduCDNq3HgwTg4ZhEw6; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	Not reported	Not reported
Epoch · GPQA diamond · v1.0.9Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.9; scorer choice Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	92.8% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.9; scorer choice; model=gemini-3.5-flash_high; run=dYYtcwENFRtm9jZTDA2p9C; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · Mystery Game Puzzles · v1.0.4 · Tool submissionEpoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer agent_submitted_next_move_scorer Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	32% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer agent_submitted_next_move_scorer; model=gemini-3.5-flash_high; run=GQKsxFbdBWB546zE8ci49f; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · Mystery Game Puzzles · v1.0.4 · Exact moveEpoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer exact_match_next_move_scorer Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	28% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.0.4; scorer exact_match_next_move_scorer; model=gemini-3.5-flash_low; run=nrh3xa3Bn765Q6DXWoVfbS; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	Not reported	Not reported
Epoch · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · v1.1.4Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.4; scorer model_extracted_exact_match Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	95.56% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.4; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.5-flash_high; run=eYmgjYJfM7Utm46nfoRfZ6; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Epoch · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · v1.1.6Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	80% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.5-flash_minimal; run=JuM7FArkmhLqqKBqudySsC; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	88.89% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.1.6; scorer model_extracted_exact_match; model=gemini-3.5-flash_low; run=ig7gQ23WRms9SQLLNPtbTi; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv	Not reported	Not reported
Epoch · SimpleQA Verified · v1.2.0Epoch AI · Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.2.0; scorer simpleqa_scorer Benchmark details Epoch AI internal evaluation. Mean accuracy under the published setting; exact task version and scorer stay separate. Related tasks share a family budget. Data by Epoch AI, CC BY. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	66.2% Reported settings Epoch AI Inspect; task 1.2.0; scorer simpleqa_scorer; model=gemini-3.5-flash_high; run=GJ6YsSuzyRD9YXe6SBwvsu; mean accuracy; https://epoch.ai/data/benchmarks.csv
Vals AI · Finance Agent v2Vals AI · Vals FAB v2 shared six-tool harness; two-hour task limit Benchmark details Overall weighted rubric accuracy, averaged over three runs on 450 tasks. Dealbreaker failures and timeouts score zero. Related categories and all-pass scores are not additional votes. Three-model judge panel; private test set. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	57.86% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.5-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.5-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Code Migration v1Vals AI · Vals Code Migration shared agent harness Benchmark details Hidden behavior-test pass rate, equally weighted across 40 repositories (30 CLI and 10 COBOL-to-Java). Anti-cheat failures score zero. Code-quality ratings and language splits are not additional votes. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	26.75% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.5-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.5-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Legal Research Bench v1Vals AI · Vals Legal Research shared five-tool harness; three-hour task limit Benchmark details All-pass accuracy on 208 private legal research tasks. Every expert rubric check must pass; GPT-5.4 judges responses. Partial-credit scores and practice-area splits are not additional votes. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	30.77% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.5-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.5-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Excel Modeling Benchmark v1Vals AI · Vals EMB shared workbook agent harness; 3.5-hour task limit Benchmark details Mean of seven equally weighted task categories. Template submissions use recalculated Excel cell accuracy; scratch submissions use rubric checks judged by GPT-5.4 Mini XHigh. Partial credit does not mean task completion. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	63.55% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.5-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.5-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · MMLU-Pro v1Vals AI · Vals MMLU-Pro five-shot chain-of-thought; regex answer grading Benchmark details Mean accuracy across 14 subjects under Vals five-shot prompting. Subject splits share one family and are not additional votes. Vals labels this benchmark archived; it is historical corroboration, not ongoing frontier evaluation. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	89.52% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.5-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.5-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-01","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Terminal-Bench 2.1Vals AI · Vals Terminus 2 harness; pass@1 on 89 tasks Benchmark details Overall task pass rate under the shared Terminus 2 configuration. All task tests must pass. Difficulty splits share one family. Fable 5 and Opus 5 mixed-checkpoint fallback runs are excluded. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	74.16% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.5-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.5-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}
Vals AI · Vibe Code Bench v1.1Vals AI · Vals modified OpenHands harness; five hours or 1,000 turns per app Benchmark details Mean app test pass rate on the canonical v1.1 test set. Browser Use executes workflow tests; each test requires at least 90% of its substeps. Automated judging can introduce error. Alternate agents are excluded. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	48.68% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.5-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.5-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":"OpenHands"}
Vals AI · Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark v1Vals AI · Vals Harvey held-out legal file-work protocol; internet disabled Benchmark details Mean task resolution across two judges (GPT-5.5 Medium and Sonnet 4.6), requiring every criterion to pass. Criteria pass rates and practice-area splits do not add votes. Shared Harvey family; Fable 5 fallback run excluded. Unit: percent. Source collected 2026-09-12.	Not reported	Not reported	Not reported	2.5% Reported settings {"checkpoint":"gemini-3.5-flash","evaluatorModel":"google/gemini-3.5-flash","sourceUpdatedOn":"2026-09-10","reasoning_effort":"high","compute_effort":null,"reasoning":null,"temperature":1,"top_p":null,"max_output_tokens":65536,"verbosity":null,"provider":"Google","harness":null}

What these comparisons mean

Each source reports its own effort labels. Matching labels do not establish equal compute budgets or identical fallback behavior. Open Reported settings to inspect the exact model name, agent and task coverage. Multiple results at one level remain visible rather than selecting the best. Source-reported None or Non-reasoning labels are not treated as evidence that an API supports those settings.

These measurements use their own dated source collection. The leaderboard fits identified configurations jointly; it contains no pooled model ratings. Explicit thinking budgets are separate configurations. Read the methodology.

Download all effort benchmark results · 7,424 results across 240 models · Collected 2026-09-12

Gemini 3.5 Flash effort benchmarks

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Capability score evidence

One configuration, seven capabilities

Agentic

Hard reasoning

Coding

Human pref

Knowledge

Multimodal

Long context