Evidence coverage

2666 published observations across 285 measures. Capability scoring groups compatible evidence into 43 benchmark families.

A published result contributes only when a matching reference-panel result is available. Missing evidence stays unknown. Coverage describes breadth, separately from performance.

Coverage across our labs

Lab	Models with results	Published measures	Launch sources
OpenAI	31 / 37	209	16
Anthropic	11 / 11	217	17
xAI	3 / 7	18	1
Google	21 / 34	109	8
Meta	11 / 14	33	2
Mistral	16 / 27	15	1
Moonshot	3 / 7	119	7
Qwen	28 / 81	91	4
DeepSeek	4 / 15	28	2
NVIDIA	2 / 10	41	1
Z.ai	17 / 52	93	7
MiniMax	6 / 13	64	2
Cohere	10 / 26	18	1
Amazon	5 / 6	19	1
Microsoft	9 / 24	19	1
Xiaomi	3 / 11	3	0
StepFun	2 / 4	2	0
LG AI Research	5 / 13	3	0
Upstage	4 / 8	2	0
ByteDance	1 / 16	1	0
Tencent	1 / 13	2	0
Baidu	1 / 20	1	0
OpenBMB	1 / 1	1	0
Agnes AI	1 / 1	1	0

Models and contributing families

Raw published counts include all source types. Contributing and independent family counts follow the selected evidence policy.

11 models match “Anthropic”. Clear search

Model	Published measures	Contributing families	With independent support	Explore
Claude Fable 5	115	24	5	Published results
Claude Opus 4.8	108	22	3	Published results
Claude Opus 5	65	21	6	Published results
Claude Fable 5.1	40	16	2	Published results
Claude Sonnet 4.6	40	16	4	Published results
Claude Sonnet 4.5	30	15	5	Published results
Claude Haiku 4.5	18	11	3	Published results
Claude Opus 4.7	33	11	2	Published results
Claude Sonnet 5	13	6	1	Published results
Claude Opus 4.6	34	5	3	Published results
Claude Opus 4.5	3	3	3	Published results

Family coverage

Benchmark family	Capability	Models contributing	With independent support
OSWorld	Agentic	19	6
Webarena Verified	Agentic	4	0
Browsecomp	Agentic	22	0
Toolathlon	Agentic	15	0
MCP-Atlas	Agentic	19	0
AutomationBench	Agentic	19	0
DeepSearchQA	Agentic	10	0
GDPval	Agentic	60	41
Bfcl V4	Agentic	12	0
Apex Agents	Agentic	10	0
OfficeQA	Agentic	11	0
Humanity’s Last Exam	Hard reasoning	31	8
GPQA	Hard reasoning	48	23
ARC-AGI	Hard reasoning	48	48
Aime	Hard reasoning	22	0
FrontierMath	Hard reasoning	10	0
Imo Answerbench	Hard reasoning	5	0
Terminal-Bench Science	Hard reasoning	5	0
SWE-bench Verified	Coding	38	19
SWE-bench Pro	Coding	20	4
SWE-bench Multilingual	Coding	9	0
DeepSWE	Coding	31	28
LiveCodeBench	Coding	25	9
Terminal-Bench	Coding	41	2
Scicode	Coding	7	0
Human preference (Arena)	Human pref	115	115
MMLU-Pro	Knowledge	68	52
Gmmlu	Knowledge	3	0
Milu	Knowledge	3	0
Simpleqa Verified	Knowledge	2	0
Mmmu	Multimodal	2	0
Mmmu Pro	Multimodal	24	0
CharXiv	Multimodal	16	0
Mathvista	Multimodal	2	0
Chartography	Multimodal	3	0
Lvbench	Multimodal	6	0
ScreenSpot	Multimodal	12	0
Ocrbench V2 Average Accuracy	Multimodal	12	0
MRCR	Long context	12	0
Longbench	Long context	8	0
Ruler 1M	Long context	2	0
Graphwalks	Long context	7	0
Aa Lcr	Long context	5	0

Model evidence matrix

Showing the same 1–11 models as the list above.

Model	OSWorld	Webarena Verified	Browsecomp	Toolathlon	MCP-Atlas	AutomationBench	DeepSearchQA	GDPval	Bfcl V4	Apex Agents	OfficeQA	Humanity’s Last Exam	GPQA	ARC-AGI	Aime	FrontierMath	Imo Answerbench	Terminal-Bench Science	SWE-bench Verified	SWE-bench Pro	SWE-bench Multilingual	DeepSWE	LiveCodeBench	Terminal-Bench	Scicode	Human preference (Arena)	MMLU-Pro	Gmmlu	Milu	Simpleqa Verified	Mmmu	Mmmu Pro	CharXiv	Mathvista	Chartography	Lvbench	ScreenSpot	Ocrbench V2 Average Accuracy	MRCR	Longbench	Ruler 1M	Graphwalks	Aa Lcr
Claude Fable 5	66.7 Independent support · 10/10 reference peers	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 8/8 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	33.9 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	50.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	66.7 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	72.2 Provider reports · 7/7 reference peers	32.5 Independent support · 25/25 reference peers	61.7 Independent support · 47/47 reference peers	Unknown	86.1 Provider reports · 9/9 reference peers	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	83.3 Provider reports · 8/8 reference peers	0.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	70.9 Independent support · 28/28 reference peers	Unknown	40.0 Provider reports · 12/12 reference peers	Unknown	100.0 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	Unknown	50.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	50.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	68.8 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	50.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Claude Opus 4.8	70.8 Provider reports · 8/8 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	20.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	83.6 Provider reports · 14/14 reference peers	58.3 Provider reports · 7/7 reference peers	44.7 Provider reports · 13/13 reference peers	16.7 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	85.7 Provider reports · 8/8 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	80.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	63.3 Provider reports · 12/12 reference peers	0.0 Provider reports · 10/10 reference peers	73.4 Independent support · 47/47 reference peers	Unknown	16.7 Provider reports · 6/6 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	94.4 Provider reports · 9/9 reference peers	Unknown	43.1 Independent support · 28/28 reference peers	Unknown	41.7 Provider reports · 13/13 reference peers	Unknown	90.4 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	62.5 Provider reports · 6/6 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	Unknown	62.5 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown
Claude Opus 5	63.7 Independent support · 9/9 reference peers	Unknown	66.7 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	72.2 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	50.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	91.7 Independent support · 47/47 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 1/1 reference peers	31.1 Provider reports · 8/8 reference peers	42.3 Independent support · 22/22 reference peers	70.8 Independent support · 47/47 reference peers	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	50.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	33.3 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	76.3 Independent support · 28/28 reference peers	Unknown	69.4 Provider reports · 8/8 reference peers	Unknown	96.5 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	0.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	20.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 1/1 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Claude Fable 5.1	100.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	87.5 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 1/1 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	51.4 Independent support · 22/22 reference peers	53.4 Independent support · 47/47 reference peers	Unknown	50.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	75.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	50.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	0.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	90.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Claude Sonnet 4.6	20.0 Independent support · 10/10 reference peers	Unknown	25.0 Provider reports · 10/10 reference peers	Unknown	14.3 Provider reports · 7/7 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	71.4 Provider reports · 7/7 reference peers	Unknown	20.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	40.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	63.8 Independent support · 47/47 reference peers	37.5 Provider reports · 6/6 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	36.1 Provider reports · 12/12 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	3.7 Independent support · 27/27 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	89.5 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 1/1 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 1/1 reference peers	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 1/1 reference peers	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 1/1 reference peers	Unknown
Claude Sonnet 4.5	20.0 Independent support · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	75.0 Provider reports · 4/4 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	42.9 Independent support · 7/7 reference peers	72.7 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	23.4 Independent support · 47/47 reference peers	47.7 Provider reports · 15/15 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	65.7 Independent support · 28/28 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	44.4 Provider reports · 9/9 reference peers	88.9 Provider reports · 9/9 reference peers	Unknown	77.2 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	68.2 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	9.1 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Claude Haiku 4.5	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	90.9 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	27.3 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	13.8 Independent support · 47/47 reference peers	36.4 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	69.4 Independent support · 24/24 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	11.1 Provider reports · 9/9 reference peers	77.8 Provider reports · 9/9 reference peers	Unknown	58.8 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	27.3 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	27.3 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 11/11 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Claude Opus 4.7	100.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	35.7 Provider reports · 7/7 reference peers	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 7/7 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	85.7 Provider reports · 7/7 reference peers	Unknown	80.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	33.3 Provider reports · 3/3 reference peers	71.4 Independent support · 7/7 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 6/6 reference peers	100.0 Provider reports · 6/6 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	98.2 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	20.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Claude Sonnet 5	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	60.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	17.6 Independent support · 27/27 reference peers	Unknown	10.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	0.0 Provider reports · 1/1 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Claude Opus 4.6	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	80.0 Provider reports · 5/5 reference peers	Unknown	100.0 Provider reports · 2/2 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	94.4 Independent support · 21/21 reference peers	29.2 Independent support · 6/6 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	99.1 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown
Claude Opus 4.5	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	57.1 Independent support · 7/7 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	83.3 Independent support · 18/18 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	88.6 Independent support · 114/114 reference peers	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown

Family definitions and scoring rules · Compare capabilities · Compare published evidence