RankingHealthBench Professional · source release snapshot; version not specified

HealthBench Professional · source release snapshot; version not specified

Data updated 12 Sept 2026

Bucket
Supporting evidence
Unit
percent
Direction
Higher is better
Version
source release snapshot; version not specified
Display harness
MAI-Thinking-1 technical report
Board
https://microsoft.ai/pdf/mai-thinking-1.pdf

The available records have no admitted matched comparison in the capability core. Raw results remain available below.

Compare published benchmark results with category weights →

Models

ModelScoreHarnessEvidenceSource-recorded date
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic38%
Reported settings & source

Microsoft own evaluation suite; Sonnet max reasoning; Tables 12/19. LongBenchV2 capped 256k,408 questions; CorpusQA GPT-5.4 high judge; 4 runs.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Tables 12 and 19 · reviewed 2026-09-06

MAI-Thinking-1 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
MAI-Thinking-1Microsoft35%
Reported settings & source

Microsoft own evaluation suite; Sonnet max reasoning; Tables 12/19. LongBenchV2 capped 256k,408 questions; CorpusQA GPT-5.4 high judge; 4 runs.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Tables 12 and 19 · reviewed 2026-09-06

MAI-Thinking-1 technical reportlab self-report2026-09-06
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic55.8%
Reported settings & source

Meta Model API xhigh; Gemini high; Opus max; GPT xhigh. Best of self-reported or Meta reproduction unless specified. OSWorld GUI only; Terminal bash only5attempts89tasks6CPU8GB; DeepSWE no internet5attempts.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Muse Spark 1.1 evaluation report Figure44 · Figure44 physical page101; methodology pages101–105 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Muse Spark 1.1 evaluation report Figure44lab self-report2026-09-06
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle41.6%
Reported settings & source

Meta Model API xhigh; Gemini high; Opus max; GPT xhigh. Best of self-reported or Meta reproduction unless specified. OSWorld GUI only; Terminal bash only5attempts89tasks6CPU8GB; DeepSWE no internet5attempts.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Muse Spark 1.1 evaluation report Figure44 · Figure44 physical page101; methodology pages101–105 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Muse Spark 1.1 evaluation report Figure44lab self-report2026-09-06
GPT-5.5OpenAI51.8%
Reported settings & source

Meta Model API xhigh; Gemini high; Opus max; GPT xhigh. Best of self-reported or Meta reproduction unless specified. OSWorld GUI only; Terminal bash only5attempts89tasks6CPU8GB; DeepSWE no internet5attempts.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Muse Spark 1.1 evaluation report Figure44 · Figure44 physical page101; methodology pages101–105 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Muse Spark 1.1 evaluation report Figure44lab self-report2026-09-06
Muse Spark 1.1Meta59.3%
Reported settings & source

Meta Model API xhigh; Gemini high; Opus max; GPT xhigh. Best of self-reported or Meta reproduction unless specified. OSWorld GUI only; Terminal bash only5attempts89tasks6CPU8GB; DeepSWE no internet5attempts.

First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup.

Muse Spark 1.1 evaluation report Figure44 · Figure44 physical page101; methodology pages101–105 · reviewed 2026-09-06

Muse Spark 1.1 evaluation report Figure44lab self-report2026-09-06