RankingHMMT February 2026 · source release snapshot; version not specified
HMMT February 2026 · source release snapshot; version not specified
- Bucket
- Supporting evidence
- Unit
- percent
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Version
- source release snapshot; version not specified
- Display harness
- MAI-Thinking-1 technical report
- Board
- https://microsoft.ai/pdf/mai-thinking-1.pdf
The available records have no admitted matched comparison in the capability core. Raw results remain available below.
Compare published benchmark results with category weights →
Models
| Model | Score | Harness | Evidence | Source-recorded date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi-K2.6Moonshot | 92.7%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| MAI-Thinking-1Microsoft | 84.9%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| GLM-5.1Z.ai | 82.6%Reported settings & sourceMAI avg 4 runs, temperature 1, top-p .97; simple ReAct bash/string-replace; Terminal-Bench ignores predefined timeouts. Comparator configurations from cited reports. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Table 11, PDF page 53 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |