RankingAdvancedIF rubric-level · source release snapshot; version not specified
AdvancedIF rubric-level · source release snapshot; version not specified
- Bucket
- Supporting evidence
- Unit
- percent
- Direction
- Higher is better
- Version
- source release snapshot; version not specified
- Display harness
- MAI-Thinking-1 technical report
- Board
- https://microsoft.ai/pdf/mai-thinking-1.pdf
The available records have no admitted matched comparison in the capability core. Raw results remain available below.
Compare published benchmark results with category weights →
Models
| Model | Score | Harness | Evidence | Source-recorded date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic | 86%Reported settings & sourceMicrosoft own evaluation suite; Sonnet max reasoning; Tables 12/19. LongBenchV2 capped 256k,408 questions; CorpusQA GPT-5.4 high judge; 4 runs. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Tables 12 and 19 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |
| MAI-Thinking-1Microsoft | 85%Reported settings & sourceMicrosoft own evaluation suite; Sonnet max reasoning; Tables 12/19. LongBenchV2 capped 256k,408 questions; CorpusQA GPT-5.4 high judge; 4 runs. First-party reported result; comparator results retain the source evaluation setup. MAI-Thinking-1 technical report · Tables 12 and 19 · reviewed 2026-09-06 | MAI-Thinking-1 technical report | lab self-report | 2026-09-06 |