RankingInternal STEM preference vs GLM-5.3

Internal STEM preference vs GLM-5.3

Data updated 8 Oct 2026

The available records have no admitted matched comparison in the capability core. Raw results remain available below.

Models

Published configurations retain their source and harness labels. Missing results remain unknown.

1–1 of 1 entries

Model	Score	Harness	Evidence	Source-recorded date
Mistral Large 4Mistral	69 weighted win rate percent Reported settings & source Public Mistral Large4 Preview. Effort, sampling and evaluation budgets are not stated. Internal expert preference assessment onmath/physics; source prints weighted win rate69%. Sample size and weighting formula unspecified. Provider-published lab_self_report; retained as launch evidence, not an independent board admission. Do not replace weighted win rate with the65% sum of positive-preference categories; comparator is GLM-5.3. Exact printed chart label; asset https://mistral.ai/_astro/ml4-vs-glm-5.3-%E2%80%94-stem-win-rate-breakdown%201_Z21ewlj.webp?dpl=6ac6a8353c2a68969e300fd2; asset SHA256 80c3f8474bb21a8f7f4eb2e19cff07627a34bc492413e4698f024880227056d5. Comparison limit: Provider publication; exact benchmark-specific configuration and independent evaluation provenance require separate review before matched-board admission. Introducing Mistral Large 4 — public preview · Capabilities deep-dive; Internal STEM preference vs GLM-5.3; chart 18 (mistral-chart-18.webp) · reviewed 2026-10-07	Introducing Mistral Large 4 — public preview	lab self-report	2026-10-07