UnifyBench

RankingAutomationBench-AA

AutomationBench-AA

Data updated 23 Sept 2026

Bucket
Supporting evidence
Unit
percent
Direction
Higher is better
Version
aa-score
Display harness
Artificial Analysis AutomationBench-AA
Board
https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/automationbench-aa

AutomationBench-AA score: share of task objectives completed with no guardrail violation, on Artificial Analysis's private 657-task holdout. This is not Zapier's tasks-completed rate. The effort dataset already includes this evaluation in the agentic family under the existing equal-family budget. These rows are the board, not a second weight.

Compare published benchmark results with category weights →

Models

Results are ordered by score in the display harness, followed by models with no result. Other harnesses are listed separately below. Missing results remain unknown.

126–150 of 455 entries

ModelScoreEvidenceSource-recorded date
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-PTBaidu———
ERNIE-4.5-VL-28B-A3B-ThinkingBaidu———
ERNIE-4.5-VL-424B-A47B-PTBaidu———
ERNIE-5.0Baidu———
ERNIE-5.0-thinking-expBaidu———
ERNIE-5.0-thinking-latestBaidu———
ERNIE-5.0-thinking-previewBaidu———
ERNIE-5.1Baidu———
EXAONE 3.0 7.8B InstructLG AI Research———
EXAONE 3.5 2.4B InstructLG AI Research———
EXAONE 3.5 32B InstructLG AI Research———
EXAONE 3.5 7.8B InstructLG AI Research———
EXAONE 4.0 1.2BLG AI Research———
EXAONE 4.0 32BLG AI Research———
EXAONE 4.0.1 32BLG AI Research———
EXAONE 4.5 33BLG AI Research———
EXAONE Deep 2.4BLG AI Research———
EXAONE Deep 32BLG AI Research———
EXAONE Deep 7.8BLG AI Research———
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle———
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle———
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle———
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle———
Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle———
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle———