The leaders, at a glance

UnifyBench ranking

Name: UnifyBench public ranking snapshot
Creator: UnifyBench
Published: 2026-09-12T08:38:19.822Z

Compare AI models and measured effort settings across published benchmarks.

See the full ranking ↓How configurations are ranked

Capability leaders

Experimental comparison score · 0–100

For the selected profile and sources. Scores are experimental; small gaps may not be meaningful. How scoring works · Effort evidence collected 2026-09-12

451unique modelsEach model counted once across effort levels 492model configurationsDocumented model + effort settings, including unranked

109aggregated sourcesOriginal reports and benchmark leaderboards

Explore all 109 sources Independent evaluations and lab reports

Distinct source pages with published results in the catalog. Multiple results and page sections count as one source.

Every ranked row is a measured configuration. The default view shows the highest-scoring supported configuration per model. In Value, the budget is applied first. Select All efforts for the full comparison. How effort ranking works.

Customize ranking

Full ranking

215 entries

Capability ranking of measured model configurations. Scores are experimental; missing results remain unknown.
Rank	Model	Score	Evidence breadth	analyst-agent	briefcase	aime	apex-agents	aa-lcr	automationbench	critpt	enterprise-ops	gdp-pdf	gdpval	gmmlu	gpqa	harvey	hle	ifbench	itbench	livecodebench	math500	mmlu-pro	mmmu-pro	omniscience	scicode	tau-bench	terminal-bench	arc-agi	deepswe	swe-bench-pro	arc-agi-3	frontiercode	enigma-eval	swe-atlas-qna	swe-atlas-refactoring	swe-atlas-test-writing	livebench-math	livebench-coding	livebench-language	livebench-data	multi-swe-bench	livebench-reasoning	livebench-instructions	swe-rebench	epoch-game-puzzles	frontiermath	simpleqa	vals-finance-agent	vals-code-migration	vals-legal-research	vals-excel-modeling	vibe-code	chartography	osworld	charxiv	swe-bench-multilingual	deepsearchqa	officeqa	mcp-atlas	toolathlon	mrcr	browsecomp
51	GPT-5.3 Codex · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	23.0	Independent corroboration12 published · 11 families · 6 task areas81% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	59.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	99.2197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	92.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	91.7178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	85.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	96.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	79.2171/171 peersIndependent evidence	98.5169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.03/3 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
52	GPT-5.1 · HighOpenAI Measured effort: High	21.7	Independent corroboration18 published · 15 families · 6 task areas59% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	96.5108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	94.2197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	57.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	92.963/63 peersIndependent evidence	84.7212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	88.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	80.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	86.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	66.5202/202 peersIndependent evidence	78.1201/201 peersIndependent evidence	56.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
53	MiMo-V2.5-Pro · ReasoningXiaomi Measured effort: Reasoning	20.8	Single independent source22 published · 17 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	70.228/28 peersIndependent evidence	63.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	9.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	74.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	56.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	81.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	39.988/88 peersIndependent evidence	78.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	84.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	36.637/37 peersIndependent evidence	90.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	98.4178/178 peersIndependent evidence	75.428/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	62.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	75.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	65.4202/202 peersIndependent evidence	65.4201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
54	GLM-5 · ReasoningZ.ai Measured effort: Reasoning	20.2	Single independent source10 published · 9 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	—	31.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	87.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	76.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	72.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	86.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	87.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	73.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.4171/171 peersIndependent evidence	94.6169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
55	Qwen3.5-397B-A17B · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	19.4	Single independent source23 published · 19 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	42.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	50.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	88.5197/197 peersIndependent evidence	51.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	75.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	29.941/41 peersIndependent evidence	70.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	56.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	89.663/63 peersIndependent evidence	89.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	27.937/37 peersIndependent evidence	84.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	97.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	58.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	84.5114/114 peersIndependent evidence	80.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	54.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	74.0202/202 peersIndependent evidence	58.8201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
56	GLM-4.7 · ReasoningZ.ai Measured effort: Reasoning	19.3	Single independent source15 published · 12 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	97.2108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	77.2197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	76.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	72.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.8212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	81.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	81.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.5112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.2114/114 peersIndependent evidence	—	78.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	72.9202/202 peersIndependent evidence	67.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
57	Qwen3.5-27B · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	19.1	Single independent source12 published · 11 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	90.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	64.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	79.963/63 peersIndependent evidence	83.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	79.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	93.5178/178 peersIndependent evidence	67.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	81.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	56.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	89.6171/171 peersIndependent evidence	80.0169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
58	Solar Pro 4 · ReasoningUpstage Measured effort: Reasoning	19.1	Single independent source13 published · 11 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	82.9197/197 peersIndependent evidence	49.489/89 peersIndependent evidence	84.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	43.988/88 peersIndependent evidence	80.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.7212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	84.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	49.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	51.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	69.7112/112 peersIndependent evidence	58.7125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
59	Claude Sonnet 4.5 · Thinking 32KAnthropic Measured effort: Thinking 32K	18.9	Independent corroboration5 published · 4 families · 1 task areas53% weight: ARC PrizeWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	55.038/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	15.739/39 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
60	GLM-5-Turbo · ReasoningZ.ai Measured effort: Reasoning	18.6	Single independent source9 published · 8 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	78.0197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	55.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	80.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	81.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	90.0178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	77.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.9171/171 peersIndependent evidence	82.2169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
61	Hy3-preview · ReasoningTencent Measured effort: Reasoning	18.4	Single independent source9 published · 8 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	68.5197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	86.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	74.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	76.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	87.6171/171 peersIndependent evidence	82.8169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
62	Solar Open2 250B · ReasoningUpstage Measured effort: Reasoning	18.1	Single independent source10 published · 9 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	77.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	63.7123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	49.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	65.391/91 peersIndependent evidence	65.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	55.7125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
63	GPT-5.4 Mini · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	18.0	Independent corroboration58 published · 35 families · 6 task areas22% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	30.228/28 peersIndependent evidence	46.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	64.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	52.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	64.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	86.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	35.741/41 peersIndependent evidence	70.288/88 peersIndependent evidence	68.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	86.263/63 peersIndependent evidence	83.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	10.850/50 peersIndependent evidence	79.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	88.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	55.228/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	8.031/31 peersIndependent evidence	69.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	84.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	76.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	72.1202/202 peersIndependent evidence	73.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	47.638/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	12.95/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	12.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	4.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	16.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	56.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	24.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	6.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	6.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	20.230/30 peersIndependent evidence	15.233/33 peersIndependent evidence	7.932/32 peersIndependent evidence	19.832/32 peersIndependent evidence	26.532/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
64	GPT-5 · HighOpenAI Measured effort: High	18.0	Independent corroboration23 published · 17 families · 6 task areas46% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	96.6108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	59.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	95.363/63 peersIndependent evidence	81.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	89.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	94.9112/112 peersIndependent evidence	100.060/60 peersIndependent evidence	96.1114/114 peersIndependent evidence	75.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	89.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	72.7202/202 peersIndependent evidence	60.5201/201 peersIndependent evidence	47.038/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	58.82/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
65	o4-mini · HighOpenAI Measured effort: High	17.7	Independent corroboration16 published · 14 families · 6 task areas42% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	93.1108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	56.6197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	61.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	61.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	66.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	80.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.4112/112 peersIndependent evidence	97.560/60 peersIndependent evidence	85.4114/114 peersIndependent evidence	59.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	66.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	59.3171/171 peersIndependent evidence	53.7169/169 peersIndependent evidence	36.638/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
66	MiniMax-M2.5 · ReasoningMiniMax Measured effort: Reasoning	17.7	Single independent source10 published · 9 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	81.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	70.7200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	67.063/63 peersIndependent evidence	80.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	74.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	87.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	73.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.5171/171 peersIndependent evidence	85.2169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
67	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · ReasoningGoogle Measured effort: Reasoning	17.3	Single independent source17 published · 14 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	43.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	66.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	68.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	74.341/41 peersIndependent evidence	75.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	65.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	74.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	71.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	88.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	78.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	40.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	57.9112/112 peersIndependent evidence	60.4125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
68	Qwen3.6-27B · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	17.2	Single independent source19 published · 15 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	53.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	89.1197/197 peersIndependent evidence	52.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	70.7200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	64.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	66.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	77.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	56.237/37 peersIndependent evidence	77.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	81.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	78.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	52.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	45.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	76.9202/202 peersIndependent evidence	58.5201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
69	o3 · ReasoningOpenAI Measured effort: Reasoning	17.1	Single independent source14 published · 13 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	91.5108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.8197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	70.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	72.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	73.5208/208 peersIndependent evidence	86.0178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	91.9112/112 peersIndependent evidence	99.660/60 peersIndependent evidence	91.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	65.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	88.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	73.3171/171 peersIndependent evidence	89.2169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
70	DeepSeek-V3.2 · ReasoningDeepSeek Measured effort: Reasoning	17.0	Single independent source16 published · 14 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	95.5108/108 peersIndependent evidence	38.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	82.1197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	78.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	49.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	78.363/63 peersIndependent evidence	76.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	79.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	72.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.5112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	94.4114/114 peersIndependent evidence	—	84.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.3171/171 peersIndependent evidence	72.2201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
71	MiMo-V2-Flash · ReasoningXiaomi Measured effort: Reasoning	16.9	Single independent source13 published · 12 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	98.0108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	76.5197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	81.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	67.663/63 peersIndependent evidence	80.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	77.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	76.7178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.4112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	89.5114/114 peersIndependent evidence	—	68.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.5171/171 peersIndependent evidence	72.3169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
72	GPT-5.4 Nano · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	16.5	Independent corroboration47 published · 26 families · 6 task areas41% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	43.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	59.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	57.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	43.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	87.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	28.941/41 peersIndependent evidence	48.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	62.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	68.8212/212 peersIndependent evidence	9.937/37 peersIndependent evidence	80.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	93.8178/178 peersIndependent evidence	19.728/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	52.7114/114 peersIndependent evidence	70.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	59.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	71.3202/202 peersIndependent evidence	68.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	37.738/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	39.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	3.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	6.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	45.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	36.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	30.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	46.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
73	NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra · ReasoningNVIDIA Measured effort: Reasoning	16.2	Single independent source21 published · 16 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	7.628/28 peersIndependent evidence	61.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	75.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	33.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	78.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	18.941/41 peersIndependent evidence	43.388/88 peersIndependent evidence	71.2123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.7212/212 peersIndependent evidence	46.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	81.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	99.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	62.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	39.291/91 peersIndependent evidence	65.4202/202 peersIndependent evidence	68.6201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
74	Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite · HighGoogle Measured effort: High	16.2	Single independent source4 published · 4 families · 1 task areas100% weight: Epoch AIWhy this score?	—	—	63.848/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	55.347/47 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	75.450/50 peersIndependent evidence	44.039/39 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
75	DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale · ReasoningDeepSeek Measured effort: Reasoning	16.2	Single independent source13 published · 12 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	99.0108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	73.2197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	86.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	85.863/63 peersIndependent evidence	84.8212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	76.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.5112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	—	87.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	2.3171/171 peersIndependent evidence	85.1169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Behind the ranking

273 entries with published results · 215 ranked · 7 provisional estimates.

Explore seven capabilities, the original results, and gaps in the evidence.

Coding ranking Reasoning ranking Agentic ranking Compare capabilities ↗Published benchmarks ↗Evidence coverage ↗

Cite this ranking

Include the model and effort setting, the selected profile, and the dated data downloads. A shared link uses the latest data; it does not freeze a ranking in time.

UnifyBench ranking
Data updated: 12 Sept 2026
Mode: overall; evidence: documented; configurations: best
https://unifybench.ai/?page=3&trk=public_profile__reactions-text

Catalog data · Effort measurements · Configuration scoring rules · Methodology

Catalog dated 12 Sept 2026. Effort evidence collected 12 Sept 2026. Collection dates are not evaluation dates.

What does the score mean?

The adjusted comparison score estimates performance against the same reference panel from matched published comparisons. Capability pools matched comparisons across families and checks aggregate breadth and independent corroboration. Custom profiles require support in every selected capability. Missing results never count as losses.

Family details show observed win shares against available reference peers. Those descriptive values are supporting evidence, not adjusted capability scores. Provider reports and independent results remain labeled. Matching reported settings do not establish equal inference effort, and score differences do not establish statistical significance.

Read the full methodology →