The leaders, at a glance

UnifyBench ranking

Name: UnifyBench public ranking snapshot
Creator: UnifyBench
Published: 2026-09-12T08:38:19.822Z

Compare AI models and measured effort settings across published benchmarks.

See the full ranking ↓How configurations are ranked

Strongest within your budget. Capability scores stay unchanged. A lower cost breaks exact score ties; no score-to-price ratio is used. Small score gaps do not establish superiority.

89 of 398 supported configurations have comparable costs. Unknown costs and over-budget entries remain visible without a Value rank. Prices collected 2026-09-11; comparisons expire after 30 days.

USD per weighted AA v4.3 task, including reasoning, cache treatment and reviewed fallback routing. This workload does not represent every task. Cost evidence currently comes from Artificial Analysis only. Cost frontier, components and gaps ↗ · Value methodology

Value leaders

Experimental comparison score · 0–100

For the selected profile and sources. Scores are experimental; small gaps may not be meaningful. How scoring works · Effort evidence collected 2026-09-12

451unique modelsEach model counted once across effort levels 492model configurationsDocumented model + effort settings, including unranked

109aggregated sourcesOriginal reports and benchmark leaderboards

Explore all 109 sources Independent evaluations and lab reports

Distinct source pages with published results in the catalog. Multiple results and page sections count as one source.

Every ranked row is a measured configuration. The default view shows the highest-scoring supported configuration per model. In Value, the budget is applied first. Select All efforts for the full comparison. How effort ranking works.

Customize ranking

Full ranking

215 entries

Value ranking of measured model configurations. Scores are experimental; missing results remain unknown.
Rank	Model	Capability	USD / AA task	Evidence breadth	analyst-agent	briefcase	aime	apex-agents	aa-lcr	automationbench	critpt	enterprise-ops	gdp-pdf	gdpval	gmmlu	gpqa	harvey	hle	ifbench	itbench	livecodebench	math500	mmlu-pro	mmmu-pro	omniscience	scicode	tau-bench	terminal-bench	arc-agi	deepswe	swe-bench-pro	arc-agi-3	frontiercode	enigma-eval	swe-atlas-qna	swe-atlas-refactoring	swe-atlas-test-writing	livebench-math	livebench-coding	livebench-language	livebench-data	multi-swe-bench	livebench-reasoning	livebench-instructions	swe-rebench	epoch-game-puzzles	frontiermath	simpleqa	vals-finance-agent	vals-code-migration	vals-legal-research	vals-excel-modeling	vibe-code	chartography	osworld	charxiv	swe-bench-multilingual	deepsearchqa	officeqa	mcp-atlas	toolathlon	mrcr	browsecomp
51	Llama 4 Maverick · Non-reasoningMeta Measured effort: Non-reasoning	3.0	$0.03974Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source24 published · 19 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	4.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	18.6108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	36.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	7.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	9.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	4.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	59.763/63 peersIndependent evidence	39.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	28.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	49.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	39.3112/112 peersIndependent evidence	47.660/60 peersIndependent evidence	70.7114/114 peersIndependent evidence	42.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	68.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	15.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	11.9202/202 peersIndependent evidence	28.0201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
52	Ministral 3 14B · Non-reasoningMistral Measured effort: Non-reasoning	2.0	$0.13923Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source22 published · 18 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	17.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	31.5108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	28.9197/197 peersIndependent evidence	15.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	18.688/88 peersIndependent evidence	23.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	13.963/63 peersIndependent evidence	25.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	24.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	20.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	33.9112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	29.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	19.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	19.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	6.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	29.8202/202 peersIndependent evidence	24.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
53	Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct · Non-reasoningMeta Measured effort: Non-reasoning	1.6	$0.11838Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source23 published · 19 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	4.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	11.7108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	29.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	3.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	2.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	8.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	25.663/63 peersIndependent evidence	27.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	9.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	40.0178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	25.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	34.560/60 peersIndependent evidence	46.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	24.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	27.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	3.991/91 peersIndependent evidence	8.7202/202 peersIndependent evidence	15.4201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
54	Ministral 3 8B · Non-reasoningMistral Measured effort: Non-reasoning	1.5	$0.06552Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source22 published · 18 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	13.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	34.7108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	27.9197/197 peersIndependent evidence	13.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	8.988/88 peersIndependent evidence	21.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	10.563/63 peersIndependent evidence	15.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	17.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	13.8178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	26.5112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	18.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	15.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	17.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	2.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	20.2202/202 peersIndependent evidence	21.3201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
55	Ministral 3 3B · Non-reasoningMistral Measured effort: Non-reasoning	1.2	$0.04229Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source22 published · 18 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	10.787/87 peersIndependent evidence	21.9108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	20.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	16.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	2.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	16.2123/123 peersIndependent evidence	6.363/63 peersIndependent evidence	8.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	34.0208/208 peersIndependent evidence	9.0178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	17.1112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	9.7114/114 peersIndependent evidence	5.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	8.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	0.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	20.1202/202 peersIndependent evidence	9.0201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	GPT-5.5 Pro · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	65.5	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration4 published · 3 families · 1 task areas60% weight: ARC PrizeWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	—	—	99.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	91.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	92.239/39 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	GPT-5.5 · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	54.9	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration83 published · 47 families · 6 task areas23% weight: Moonshot AI (reported)Why this score?	87.228/28 peersIndependent evidence	74.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	84.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	36.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	81.641/41 peersIndependent evidence	91.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	85.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	68.4212/212 peersIndependent evidence	47.250/50 peersIndependent evidence	15.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	93.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	85.728/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	48.431/31 peersIndependent evidence	42.5115/115 peersIndependent evidence	98.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	89.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	87.6202/202 peersIndependent evidence	67.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	90.738/38 peersIndependent evidence	66.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	68.05/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	50.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	50.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	0.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	56.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	80.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	79.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	79.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	55.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	65.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	55.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	100.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	98.140/40 peersIndependent evidence	82.039/39 peersIndependent evidence	74.125/25 peersIndependent evidence	40.030/30 peersIndependent evidence	78.833/33 peersIndependent evidence	59.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	59.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	43.832/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	0.03/3 peersPublisher reports	16.83/3 peersPublisher reports	—	—	28.54/4 peersPublisher reports	28.54/4 peersPublisher reports	28.54/4 peersPublisher reports	—	—
—	Claude Opus 4.8 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	51.5	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration78 published · 42 families · 6 task areas24% weight: Moonshot AI (reported)Why this score?	74.628/28 peersIndependent evidence	84.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	0.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	58.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	95.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	70.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	92.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	89.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	25.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	82.750/50 peersIndependent evidence	87.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	71.8178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	77.431/31 peersIndependent evidence	0.03/3 peersPublisher reports	92.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	84.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	85.5202/202 peersIndependent evidence	31.1201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	25.84/4 peersPublisher reports	—	—	66.67/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	74.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	71.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	40.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	32.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	46.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	62.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	61.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	37.240/40 peersIndependent evidence	77.739/39 peersIndependent evidence	68.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	57.230/30 peersIndependent evidence	82.333/33 peersIndependent evidence	76.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	79.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	87.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	52.03/3 peersPublisher reports	34.63/3 peersPublisher reports	—	0.01/1 peersPublisher reports	100.04/4 peersPublisher reports	64.44/4 peersPublisher reports	77.14/4 peersPublisher reports	—	—
—	Claude Opus 4.6 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	42.0	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration22 published · 16 families · 6 task areas27% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	64.048/48 peersIndependent evidence	85.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	86.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	89.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	97.563/63 peersIndependent evidence	73.1213/213 peersIndependent evidence	—	89.5208/208 peersIndependent evidence	64.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	77.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	93.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	87.1171/171 peersIndependent evidence	95.7169/169 peersIndependent evidence	81.538/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	52.360/60 peersIndependent evidence	52.239/39 peersIndependent evidence	45.425/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Muse Spark 1.1 · XHighMeta Measured effort: XHigh	41.1	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration49 published · 28 families · 5 task areas26% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	55.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	83.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	73.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	89.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	75.288/88 peersIndependent evidence	78.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	86.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	92.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	96.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	62.731/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	96.391/91 peersIndependent evidence	80.3112/112 peersIndependent evidence	59.8126/126 peersIndependent evidence	—	37.625/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	31.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	37.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	26.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	49.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	76.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	53.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	55.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	76.830/30 peersIndependent evidence	39.733/33 peersIndependent evidence	43.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	37.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	55.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Gemini 3.5 Flash · HighGoogle Measured effort: High	39.8	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration65 published · 38 families · 6 task areas15% weight: DatacurveWhy this score?	71.628/28 peersIndependent evidence	57.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	71.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	75.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	88.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	95.141/41 peersIndependent evidence	86.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	75.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	35.450/50 peersIndependent evidence	94.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	94.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	76.228/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	74.031/31 peersIndependent evidence	97.4114/114 peersIndependent evidence	94.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	80.991/91 peersIndependent evidence	85.7202/202 peersIndependent evidence	70.7201/201 peersIndependent evidence	78.738/38 peersIndependent evidence	13.125/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	15.34/4 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	45.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	41.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	72.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	32.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	35.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	29.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	72.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.140/40 peersIndependent evidence	46.839/39 peersIndependent evidence	82.925/25 peersIndependent evidence	83.430/30 peersIndependent evidence	27.933/33 peersIndependent evidence	28.832/32 peersIndependent evidence	53.932/32 peersIndependent evidence	25.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	GPT-5.4 · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	38.3	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration50 published · 29 families · 6 task areas16% weight: DatacurveWhy this score?	—	—	—	84.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	96.6197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	81.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	9.832/32 peersIndependent evidence	96.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	90.1178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	47.831/31 peersIndependent evidence	83.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	94.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	84.9202/202 peersIndependent evidence	16.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	82.838/38 peersIndependent evidence	32.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	0.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	0.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	25.03/3 peersIndependent evidence	49.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	42.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	62.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	73.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	55.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	55.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	53.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	49.333/33 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	45.932/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	100.02/2 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Claude Opus 4.7 · XHighAnthropic Measured effort: XHigh	38.2	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration29 published · 9 families · 4 task areas46% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	35.57/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	63.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	70.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	29.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	54.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	40.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	59.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	46.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	70.425/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Qwen3.7-max · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	31.4	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Single independent source21 published · 17 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	59.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	65.987/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	90.4197/197 peersIndependent evidence	67.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	91.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	88.341/41 peersIndependent evidence	56.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	79.7123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	94.7212/212 peersIndependent evidence	61.537/37 peersIndependent evidence	93.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	98.4178/178 peersIndependent evidence	94.328/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	80.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	70.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	71.3202/202 peersIndependent evidence	82.4201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	GPT-5.2 · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	31.2	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration15 published · 13 families · 5 task areas37% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	100.0108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.9197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.7200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	91.8212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	91.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	92.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.1112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	77.9171/171 peersIndependent evidence	97.0169/169 peersIndependent evidence	65.638/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	92.63/3 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Gemini 3 Flash Preview · ReasoningGoogle Measured effort: Reasoning	30.5	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Single independent source17 published · 14 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	99.7108/108 peersIndependent evidence	76.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	79.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.5200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	98.563/63 peersIndependent evidence	92.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	91.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	96.7178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.4114/114 peersIndependent evidence	93.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	97.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	70.2202/202 peersIndependent evidence	90.9169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Claude Opus 4.5 · Thinking 64KAnthropic Measured effort: Thinking 64K	29.3	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Single independent source23 published · 7 families · 4 task areas100% weight: LiveBenchWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	49.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	62.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	53.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	38.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	7.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	20.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	22.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	GLM-5.2 · MaxZ.ai Measured effort: Max	29.1	UnknownIncomplete AA v4.3 workload usage; missing families are not imputed.Price source ↗	Independent corroboration40 published · 28 families · 5 task areas26% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	78.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	71.148/48 peersIndependent evidence	88.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	61.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	22.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	95.5200/200 peersIndependent evidence	66.641/41 peersIndependent evidence	57.688/88 peersIndependent evidence	86.2123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	65.7213/213 peersIndependent evidence	72.150/50 peersIndependent evidence	92.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	89.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	87.728/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	64.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	74.191/91 peersIndependent evidence	91.6202/202 peersIndependent evidence	54.0201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	15.325/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	73.050/50 peersIndependent evidence	57.539/39 peersIndependent evidence	28.225/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	58.833/33 peersIndependent evidence	41.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	39.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	0.04/4 peersPublisher reports	0.04/4 peersPublisher reports	0.04/4 peersPublisher reports	—	—
—	Kimi-K2.6 · ReasoningMoonshot Measured effort: Reasoning	28.8	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Single independent source25 published · 20 families · 6 task areas75% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	55.787/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	96.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	55.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	87.7200/200 peersIndependent evidence	49.641/41 peersIndependent evidence	73.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	74.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	66.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	91.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	94.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	45.528/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	40.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	83.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	79.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	84.8202/202 peersIndependent evidence	94.5201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.02/2 peersPublisher reports	0.01/1 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	DeepSeek V4 Flash 0424 · MaxDeepSeek Measured effort: Max	25.7	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Single independent source22 published · 17 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	78.128/28 peersIndependent evidence	52.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	77.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	68.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	86.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	53.841/41 peersIndependent evidence	60.388/88 peersIndependent evidence	74.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.8212/212 peersIndependent evidence	41.437/37 peersIndependent evidence	90.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	97.8178/178 peersIndependent evidence	51.128/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	86.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	54.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	86.4202/202 peersIndependent evidence	75.7201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha · ReasoningAgnes AI Measured effort: Reasoning	25.2	UnknownCacheable input present without a measured cache-hit rate.Price source ↗	Single independent source14 published · 12 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	78.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	85.4197/197 peersIndependent evidence	76.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	89.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	55.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	70.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	86.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	84.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	46.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	44.5112/112 peersIndependent evidence	74.6125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	GLM-5.1 · ReasoningZ.ai Measured effort: Reasoning	24.3	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Single independent source18 published · 14 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	69.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	83.1197/197 peersIndependent evidence	62.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	82.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	53.388/88 peersIndependent evidence	77.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	86.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	95.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	88.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	65.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	54.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	76.3202/202 peersIndependent evidence	77.4201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Qwen3.6-plus · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	24.0	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Single independent source13 published · 10 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	90.8197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	78.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	66.2123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	87.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	81.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	92.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	85.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	74.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.6202/202 peersIndependent evidence	84.6201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	Claude Sonnet 4.6 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	23.2	UnknownNo current, exact configuration price mapping in this collection.	Independent corroboration39 published · 30 families · 6 task areas22% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	45.828/28 peersIndependent evidence	70.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	47.348/48 peersIndependent evidence	61.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	85.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	57.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	75.5200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	78.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	78.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	91.563/63 peersIndependent evidence	47.9213/213 peersIndependent evidence	51.950/50 peersIndependent evidence	83.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	64.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	68.628/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	38.931/31 peersIndependent evidence	68.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	86.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	65.191/91 peersIndependent evidence	73.8202/202 peersIndependent evidence	44.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	64.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	9.77/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	27.750/50 peersIndependent evidence	—	9.425/25 peersIndependent evidence	37.330/30 peersIndependent evidence	60.833/33 peersIndependent evidence	49.932/32 peersIndependent evidence	48.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	31.332/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
—	GPT-5.3 Codex · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	23.0	UnknownIncomplete AA v4.3 workload usage; missing families are not imputed.Price source ↗	Independent corroboration12 published · 11 families · 6 task areas81% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	59.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	99.2197/197 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	92.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	91.7178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	85.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	96.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	—	79.2171/171 peersIndependent evidence	98.5169/169 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.03/3 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Behind the ranking

273 entries with published results · 55 ranked · 167 unranked in Value.

Explore seven capabilities, the original results, and gaps in the evidence.

Coding ranking Reasoning ranking Agentic ranking Compare capabilities ↗Published benchmarks ↗Evidence coverage ↗

Cite this ranking

Include the model and effort setting, the selected profile, and the dated data downloads. A shared link uses the latest data; it does not freeze a ranking in time.

UnifyBench ranking
Data updated: 12 Sept 2026
Mode: value; evidence: documented; configurations: best
Pricing collected: 11 Sept 2026
Cost basis: measured; budget: unlimited USD; input: 1000; output: 1000
https://unifybench.ai/?mode=value&page=3

Catalog data · Effort measurements · Configuration scoring rules · Methodology

Catalog dated 12 Sept 2026. Effort evidence collected 12 Sept 2026. Collection dates are not evaluation dates.

What does the score mean?

The adjusted comparison score estimates performance against the same reference panel from matched published comparisons. Capability pools matched comparisons across families and checks aggregate breadth and independent corroboration. Custom profiles require support in every selected capability. Missing results never count as losses.

Family details show observed win shares against available reference peers. Those descriptive values are supporting evidence, not adjusted capability scores. Provider reports and independent results remain labeled. Matching reported settings do not establish equal inference effort, and score differences do not establish statistical significance.

Read the full methodology →