The leaders, at a glance

UnifyBench ranking

Name: UnifyBench public ranking snapshot
Creator: UnifyBench
Published: 2026-09-12T08:38:19.822Z

Compare AI models and measured effort settings across published benchmarks.

See the full ranking ↓How configurations are ranked

Strongest within your budget. Capability scores stay unchanged. A lower cost breaks exact score ties; no score-to-price ratio is used. Small score gaps do not establish superiority.

89 of 398 supported configurations have comparable costs. Unknown costs and over-budget entries remain visible without a Value rank. Prices collected 2026-09-11; comparisons expire after 30 days.

USD per weighted AA v4.3 task, including reasoning, cache treatment and reviewed fallback routing. This workload does not represent every task. Cost evidence currently comes from Artificial Analysis only. Cost frontier, components and gaps ↗ · Value methodology

Value leaders

Experimental comparison score · 0–100

For the selected profile and sources. Scores are experimental; small gaps may not be meaningful. How scoring works · Effort evidence collected 2026-09-12

451unique modelsEach model counted once across effort levels 492model configurationsDocumented model + effort settings, including unranked

109aggregated sourcesOriginal reports and benchmark leaderboards

Explore all 109 sources Independent evaluations and lab reports

Distinct source pages with published results in the catalog. Multiple results and page sections count as one source.

Every ranked row is a measured configuration. The default view shows the highest-scoring supported configuration per model. In Value, the budget is applied first. Select All efforts for the full comparison. How effort ranking works.

Customize ranking

Full ranking

215 entries

Value ranking of measured model configurations. Scores are experimental; missing results remain unknown.
Rank	Model	Capability	USD / AA task	Evidence breadth	analyst-agent	briefcase	aime	apex-agents	aa-lcr	automationbench	critpt	enterprise-ops	gdp-pdf	gdpval	gmmlu	gpqa	harvey	hle	ifbench	itbench	livecodebench	math500	mmlu-pro	mmmu-pro	omniscience	scicode	tau-bench	terminal-bench	arc-agi	deepswe	swe-bench-pro	arc-agi-3	frontiercode	enigma-eval	swe-atlas-qna	swe-atlas-refactoring	swe-atlas-test-writing	livebench-math	livebench-coding	livebench-language	livebench-data	multi-swe-bench	livebench-reasoning	livebench-instructions	swe-rebench	epoch-game-puzzles	frontiermath	simpleqa	vals-finance-agent	vals-code-migration	vals-legal-research	vals-excel-modeling	vibe-code	chartography	osworld	charxiv	swe-bench-multilingual	deepsearchqa	officeqa	mcp-atlas	toolathlon	mrcr	browsecomp
26	Gemini 3.1 Pro · ReasoningGoogle Measured effort: Reasoning	32.4	$0.67473Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source25 published · 20 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	85.928/28 peersIndependent evidence	32.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	84.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	74.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	93.5200/200 peersIndependent evidence	70.141/41 peersIndependent evidence	86.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	55.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	100.063/63 peersIndependent evidence	99.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	12.337/37 peersIndependent evidence	97.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	95.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	40.328/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	96.2114/114 peersIndependent evidence	97.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	96.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	83.0202/202 peersIndependent evidence	85.3201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	Kimi-K2.7-Code · ReasoningMoonshot Measured effort: Reasoning	26.9	$0.54119Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source20 published · 15 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	57.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	82.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	67.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	88.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	57.941/41 peersIndependent evidence	66.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	73.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	78.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	88.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	74.0178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	89.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	65.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	76.1202/202 peersIndependent evidence	79.4201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	Hy3 · ReasoningTencent Measured effort: Reasoning	26.4	$0.07175Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source14 published · 12 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	66.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	91.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	58.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	82.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	65.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	75.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	87.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	82.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	67.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	67.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	63.2125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	MiniMax-M3 · ReasoningMiniMax Measured effort: Reasoning	25.1	$0.50761Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source22 published · 17 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	27.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	77.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	87.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	65.689/89 peersIndependent evidence	79.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	35.341/41 peersIndependent evidence	59.588/88 peersIndependent evidence	84.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	86.837/37 peersIndependent evidence	91.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	99.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	86.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	37.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	63.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	72.3202/202 peersIndependent evidence	78.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	Qwen3.7-plus · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	24.2	$0.32527Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source22 published · 17 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	64.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	59.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	64.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	59.489/89 peersIndependent evidence	87.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	66.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	70.988/88 peersIndependent evidence	54.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	51.237/37 peersIndependent evidence	88.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	96.5178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	92.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	61.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	60.291/91 peersIndependent evidence	77.0202/202 peersIndependent evidence	76.3201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	MiMo-V2.5-Pro · ReasoningXiaomi Measured effort: Reasoning	20.8	$0.05407Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source22 published · 17 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	70.228/28 peersIndependent evidence	63.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	9.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	74.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	56.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	81.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	39.988/88 peersIndependent evidence	78.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	84.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	36.637/37 peersIndependent evidence	90.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	98.4178/178 peersIndependent evidence	75.428/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	62.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	75.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	65.4202/202 peersIndependent evidence	65.4201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	Qwen3.5-397B-A17B · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	19.4	$0.47458Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source23 published · 19 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	42.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	50.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	88.5197/197 peersIndependent evidence	51.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	75.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	29.941/41 peersIndependent evidence	70.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	56.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	89.663/63 peersIndependent evidence	89.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	27.937/37 peersIndependent evidence	84.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	97.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	58.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	84.5114/114 peersIndependent evidence	80.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	54.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	74.0202/202 peersIndependent evidence	58.8201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite · ReasoningGoogle Measured effort: Reasoning	17.3	$0.12353Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source17 published · 14 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	43.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	66.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	68.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	74.341/41 peersIndependent evidence	75.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	65.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	74.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	71.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	88.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	78.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	40.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	57.9112/112 peersIndependent evidence	60.4125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	Qwen3.6-27B · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	17.2	$0.62124Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source19 published · 15 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	53.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	89.1197/197 peersIndependent evidence	52.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	70.7200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	64.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	66.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	77.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	56.237/37 peersIndependent evidence	77.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	81.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	78.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	52.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	45.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	76.9202/202 peersIndependent evidence	58.5201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra · ReasoningNVIDIA Measured effort: Reasoning	16.2	$0.58481Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source21 published · 16 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	7.628/28 peersIndependent evidence	61.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	75.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	33.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	78.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	18.941/41 peersIndependent evidence	43.388/88 peersIndependent evidence	71.2123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.7212/212 peersIndependent evidence	46.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	81.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	99.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	62.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	39.291/91 peersIndependent evidence	65.4202/202 peersIndependent evidence	68.6201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	MiMo-V2.5 · ReasoningXiaomi Measured effort: Reasoning	15.4	$0.01907On the cost frontierPrice source ↗	Single independent source18 published · 14 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	50.987/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	79.1197/197 peersIndependent evidence	60.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	79.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	38.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	67.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	79.8212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	79.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	79.4178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	79.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	38.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	50.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	61.2202/202 peersIndependent evidence	64.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	Qwen3.5-122B-A10B · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	14.4	$0.32475Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source19 published · 15 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	35.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	87.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	45.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	63.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	35.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	56.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	86.263/63 peersIndependent evidence	82.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	79.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	94.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	79.2114/114 peersIndependent evidence	67.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	35.191/91 peersIndependent evidence	74.5202/202 peersIndependent evidence	53.2201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	Qwen3.6-35B-A3B · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	12.4	$0.47505Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source18 published · 14 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	45.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	78.1197/197 peersIndependent evidence	43.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	55.7200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	49.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	60.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	76.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	76.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	77.1178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	80.4114/114 peersIndependent evidence	48.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	27.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	69.0202/202 peersIndependent evidence	55.0201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	Mistral Medium 3.5 · ReasoningMistral Measured effort: Reasoning	10.3	$0.43697Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source22 published · 17 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	41.528/28 peersIndependent evidence	39.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	46.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	47.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	43.641/41 peersIndependent evidence	33.388/88 peersIndependent evidence	53.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	55.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	22.537/37 peersIndependent evidence	62.5208/208 peersIndependent evidence	81.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	51.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	67.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	37.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	75.6202/202 peersIndependent evidence	55.6201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16 · ReasoningNVIDIA Measured effort: Reasoning	8.4	$1.05999Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source21 published · 16 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	3.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	3.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	49.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	38.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	78.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	4.341/41 peersIndependent evidence	30.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	39.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	65.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	73.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	85.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	0.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	65.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	25.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	53.7202/202 peersIndependent evidence	49.5201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	Claude Haiku 4.5 · ReasoningAnthropic Measured effort: Reasoning	7.5	$0.20771Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source27 published · 22 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	46.228/28 peersIndependent evidence	43.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	84.0108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	64.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	37.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	25.841/41 peersIndependent evidence	37.288/88 peersIndependent evidence	51.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	64.063/63 peersIndependent evidence	40.8212/212 peersIndependent evidence	17.837/37 peersIndependent evidence	54.0208/208 peersIndependent evidence	66.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	29.928/28 peersIndependent evidence	64.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	49.2114/114 peersIndependent evidence	34.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	44.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	43.991/91 peersIndependent evidence	47.6202/202 peersIndependent evidence	50.2201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
42	Grok-4.3 · Non-reasoningxAI Measured effort: Non-reasoning	6.4	$0.13744Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source18 published · 14 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	45.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	34.6197/197 peersIndependent evidence	18.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	30.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	61.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	36.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	40.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	58.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	52.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	66.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	32.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	45.4202/202 peersIndependent evidence	45.5201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
43	NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 · ReasoningNVIDIA Measured effort: Reasoning	5.9	$0.01675Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source20 published · 16 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	14.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	93.8108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	40.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	23.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	66.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	12.588/88 peersIndependent evidence	23.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	57.7212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	58.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	84.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.1112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	61.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	—	41.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	12.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	36.2202/202 peersIndependent evidence	32.4201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
44	NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16 · ReasoningNVIDIA Measured effort: Reasoning	5.2	$0.0931Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source16 published · 13 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	36.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	41.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	17.689/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.5200/200 peersIndependent evidence	0.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	33.688/88 peersIndependent evidence	47.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	54.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	54.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	23.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	15.991/91 peersIndependent evidence	28.9112/112 peersIndependent evidence	41.7125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
45	Mistral Small 4 · ReasoningMistral Measured effort: Reasoning	5.1	$0.04507Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source19 published · 15 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	0.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	22.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	51.1197/197 peersIndependent evidence	20.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	55.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	1.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	30.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	61.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	51.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	58.8178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	32.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	60.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	31.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	31.6202/202 peersIndependent evidence	38.9201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
46	Solar Pro 3 · ReasoningUpstage Measured effort: Reasoning	4.9	$0.07943Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source18 published · 13 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	14.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	24.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	10.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.5200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	23.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	24.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	49.4212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	53.0208/208 peersIndependent evidence	85.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	46.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	6.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	58.2202/202 peersIndependent evidence	30.7201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
47	Qwen3-Coder-Next · Non-reasoningQwen Measured effort: Non-reasoning	4.7	$0.55171Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source18 published · 14 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	27.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	48.8197/197 peersIndependent evidence	24.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	29.588/88 peersIndependent evidence	40.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	38.363/63 peersIndependent evidence	51.8212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	51.5208/208 peersIndependent evidence	29.7178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	32.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	24.991/91 peersIndependent evidence	45.5202/202 peersIndependent evidence	44.0201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
48	gpt-oss-120b · HighOpenAI Measured effort: High	4.5	$0.10742Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration28 published · 23 families · 5 task areas48% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	4.287/87 peersIndependent evidence	96.2108/108 peersIndependent evidence	13.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	30.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	7.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	67.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	5.641/41 peersIndependent evidence	36.288/88 peersIndependent evidence	44.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	60.463/63 peersIndependent evidence	60.5212/212 peersIndependent evidence	0.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	70.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	81.1178/178 peersIndependent evidence	4.128/28 peersIndependent evidence	97.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	68.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	—	58.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	20.591/91 peersIndependent evidence	56.8202/202 peersIndependent evidence	41.3201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	0.040/40 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
49	gpt-oss-20b · HighOpenAI Measured effort: High	4.1	$0.01133Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration26 published · 19 families · 5 task areas73% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	4.287/87 peersIndependent evidence	44.2150/150 peersIndependent evidence	0.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	23.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	3.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	72.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	25.988/88 peersIndependent evidence	27.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	27.363/63 peersIndependent evidence	17.9213/213 peersIndependent evidence	—	55.5208/208 peersIndependent evidence	76.8178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	87.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	44.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	—	31.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	31.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	44.6202/202 peersIndependent evidence	33.2201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	7.850/50 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
50	Mistral Large 3 · Non-reasoningMistral Measured effort: Non-reasoning	3.6	$0.10437Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source22 published · 18 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	22.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	41.8108/108 peersIndependent evidence	—	38.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	27.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	25.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	18.688/88 peersIndependent evidence	33.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	46.863/63 peersIndependent evidence	41.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	13.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	30.4178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	47.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	—	67.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	31.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	69.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	29.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	24.5202/202 peersIndependent evidence	36.3201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Behind the ranking

273 entries with published results · 55 ranked · 167 unranked in Value.

Explore seven capabilities, the original results, and gaps in the evidence.

Coding ranking Reasoning ranking Agentic ranking Compare capabilities ↗Published benchmarks ↗Evidence coverage ↗

Cite this ranking

Include the model and effort setting, the selected profile, and the dated data downloads. A shared link uses the latest data; it does not freeze a ranking in time.

UnifyBench ranking
Data updated: 12 Sept 2026
Mode: value; evidence: documented; configurations: best
Pricing collected: 11 Sept 2026
Cost basis: measured; budget: unlimited USD; input: 1000; output: 1000
https://unifybench.ai/?mode=value&page=2

Catalog data · Effort measurements · Configuration scoring rules · Methodology

Catalog dated 12 Sept 2026. Effort evidence collected 12 Sept 2026. Collection dates are not evaluation dates.

What does the score mean?

The adjusted comparison score estimates performance against the same reference panel from matched published comparisons. Capability pools matched comparisons across families and checks aggregate breadth and independent corroboration. Custom profiles require support in every selected capability. Missing results never count as losses.

Family details show observed win shares against available reference peers. Those descriptive values are supporting evidence, not adjusted capability scores. Provider reports and independent results remain labeled. Matching reported settings do not establish equal inference effort, and score differences do not establish statistical significance.

Read the full methodology →