The leaders, at a glance

UnifyBench ranking

Name: UnifyBench public ranking snapshot
Creator: UnifyBench
Published: 2026-09-12T08:38:19.822Z

Compare AI models and measured effort settings across published benchmarks.

See the full ranking ↓How configurations are ranked

Strongest within your budget. Capability scores stay unchanged. A lower cost breaks exact score ties; no score-to-price ratio is used. Small score gaps do not establish superiority.

89 of 398 supported configurations have comparable costs. Unknown costs and over-budget entries remain visible without a Value rank. Prices collected 2026-09-11; comparisons expire after 30 days.

USD per weighted AA v4.3 task, including reasoning, cache treatment and reviewed fallback routing. This workload does not represent every task. Cost evidence currently comes from Artificial Analysis only. Cost frontier, components and gaps ↗ · Value methodology

Value leaders

Experimental comparison score · 0–100

For the selected profile and sources. Scores are experimental; small gaps may not be meaningful. How scoring works · Effort evidence collected 2026-09-12

451unique modelsEach model counted once across effort levels 492model configurationsDocumented model + effort settings, including unranked

109aggregated sourcesOriginal reports and benchmark leaderboards

Explore all 109 sources Independent evaluations and lab reports

Distinct source pages with published results in the catalog. Multiple results and page sections count as one source.

Every ranked row is a measured configuration. The default view shows the highest-scoring supported configuration per model. In Value, the budget is applied first. Select All efforts for the full comparison. How effort ranking works.

Customize ranking

Full ranking

215 entries

Value ranking of measured model configurations. Scores are experimental; missing results remain unknown.
Rank	Model	Capability	USD / AA task	Evidence breadth	analyst-agent	briefcase	aime	apex-agents	aa-lcr	automationbench	critpt	enterprise-ops	gdp-pdf	gdpval	gmmlu	gpqa	harvey	hle	ifbench	itbench	livecodebench	math500	mmlu-pro	mmmu-pro	omniscience	scicode	tau-bench	terminal-bench	arc-agi	deepswe	swe-bench-pro	arc-agi-3	frontiercode	enigma-eval	swe-atlas-qna	swe-atlas-refactoring	swe-atlas-test-writing	livebench-math	livebench-coding	livebench-language	livebench-data	multi-swe-bench	livebench-reasoning	livebench-instructions	swe-rebench	epoch-game-puzzles	frontiermath	simpleqa	vals-finance-agent	vals-code-migration	vals-legal-research	vals-excel-modeling	vibe-code	chartography	osworld	charxiv	swe-bench-multilingual	deepsearchqa	officeqa	mcp-atlas	toolathlon	mrcr	browsecomp
1	Claude Fable 5.1 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	85.8	$7.62971On the cost frontierPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration63 published · 35 families · 6 task areas25% weight: Anthropic (reported)Why this score?	96.928/28 peersIndependent evidence	100.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	98.448/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	99.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	100.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.4212/212 peersIndependent evidence	66.550/50 peersIndependent evidence	100.0208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	100.031/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	100.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	94.2112/112 peersIndependent evidence	100.0125/125 peersIndependent evidence	97.738/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	87.47/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	91.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	91.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	79.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	64.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	87.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	77.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	66.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.960/60 peersIndependent evidence	95.739/39 peersIndependent evidence	97.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	87.030/30 peersIndependent evidence	90.733/33 peersIndependent evidence	98.332/32 peersIndependent evidence	100.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	96.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	100.02/2 peersPublisher reports	100.02/2 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2	GPT-6 Astra · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	83.1	$2.3088On the cost frontierPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration26 published · 20 families · 6 task areas25% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	95.787/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	93.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	100.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	99.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	92.7123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	100.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	99.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	91.191/91 peersIndependent evidence	88.4112/112 peersIndependent evidence	99.8125/125 peersIndependent evidence	100.038/38 peersIndependent evidence	100.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	100.05/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.029/29 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
3	Claude Opus 5 · MediumAnthropic Measured effort: Medium	75.7	$2.18948Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration20 published · 15 families · 6 task areas46% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	90.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	97.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	85.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	92.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	95.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	98.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	78.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	83.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	96.1125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.325/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	96.97/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	GPT-5.6 Sol · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	72.0	$1.18436On the cost frontierPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration25 published · 18 families · 6 task areas27% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	87.987/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	88.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	87.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	93.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	83.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	97.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	98.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	94.991/91 peersIndependent evidence	80.2202/202 peersIndependent evidence	96.8201/201 peersIndependent evidence	98.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	87.125/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	85.75/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5	Muse Spark 1.3 · XHighMeta Measured effort: XHigh	70.3	$1.36779Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration49 published · 27 families · 6 task areas33% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	93.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	98.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	98.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	98.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	98.250/50 peersIndependent evidence	98.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	93.7114/114 peersIndependent evidence	90.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	98.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	95.3112/112 peersIndependent evidence	76.7126/126 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	82.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	76.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	56.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	75.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	89.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	74.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	90.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	92.730/30 peersIndependent evidence	—	70.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	57.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	93.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	100.01/1 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	100.01/1 peersPublisher reports	—
6	Gemini 3.8 Flash · MediumGoogle Measured effort: Medium	70.0	$0.93104On the cost frontierPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration18 published · 15 families · 6 task areas38% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	76.787/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	99.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	97.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	90.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.388/88 peersIndependent evidence	89.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	94.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	98.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	96.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	90.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	91.1112/112 peersIndependent evidence	89.8125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	85.66/6 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
7	Claude Fable 5 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	69.0	$8.74596Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration67 published · 37 families · 6 task areas20% weight: Anthropic (reported)Why this score?	83.828/28 peersIndependent evidence	95.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	100.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	84.489/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	100.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	95.288/88 peersIndependent evidence	95.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	68.3213/213 peersIndependent evidence	94.537/37 peersIndependent evidence	99.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	73.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	93.231/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	99.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	92.0202/202 peersIndependent evidence	39.3201/201 peersIndependent evidence	96.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	84.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	97.97/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	78.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	82.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	80.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	64.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	83.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	63.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	74.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.940/40 peersIndependent evidence	93.739/39 peersIndependent evidence	—	73.230/30 peersIndependent evidence	94.033/33 peersIndependent evidence	93.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	96.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	100.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	49.62/2 peersPublisher reports	0.02/2 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
8	Grok 4.6 · HighxAI Measured effort: High	62.4	$1.85894Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration35 published · 27 families · 5 task areas16% weight: Vals AIWhy this score?	63.528/28 peersIndependent evidence	96.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	87.148/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	71.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	99.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	92.7200/200 peersIndependent evidence	91.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	83.388/88 peersIndependent evidence	96.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.2213/213 peersIndependent evidence	90.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	95.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	70.731/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	92.391/91 peersIndependent evidence	98.8112/112 peersIndependent evidence	97.8126/126 peersIndependent evidence	74.238/38 peersIndependent evidence	65.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	100.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	89.250/50 peersIndependent evidence	—	54.425/25 peersIndependent evidence	46.730/30 peersIndependent evidence	76.233/33 peersIndependent evidence	85.832/32 peersIndependent evidence	50.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	62.532/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	Kimi K3 · MaxMoonshot Measured effort: Max	62.0	$2.00013Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration49 published · 33 families · 6 task areas25% weight: Moonshot AI (reported)Why this score?	59.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	93.987/87 peersIndependent evidence	86.048/48 peersIndependent evidence	97.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	93.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	98.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	96.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	80.541/41 peersIndependent evidence	91.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	92.7123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.3213/213 peersIndependent evidence	97.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	52.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.228/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	59.231/31 peersIndependent evidence	74.4115/115 peersIndependent evidence	92.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	98.191/91 peersIndependent evidence	94.5112/112 peersIndependent evidence	89.0125/125 peersIndependent evidence	66.938/38 peersIndependent evidence	79.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	74.860/60 peersIndependent evidence	70.539/39 peersIndependent evidence	54.525/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	29.733/33 peersIndependent evidence	—	80.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	83.33/3 peersPublisher reports	100.03/3 peersPublisher reports	—	100.01/1 peersPublisher reports	75.04/4 peersPublisher reports	100.04/4 peersPublisher reports	100.04/4 peersPublisher reports	—	—
10	Gemini 3.7 Flash · HighGoogle Measured effort: High	57.6	$0.92534Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration61 published · 35 families · 6 task areas13% weight: Terminal-BenchWhy this score?	100.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	73.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	78.848/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	75.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	97.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	89.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	87.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.6213/213 peersIndependent evidence	78.150/50 peersIndependent evidence	97.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	83.831/31 peersIndependent evidence	99.2114/114 peersIndependent evidence	97.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	93.391/91 peersIndependent evidence	82.8112/112 peersIndependent evidence	12.9126/126 peersIndependent evidence	89.838/38 peersIndependent evidence	67.225/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	100.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	59.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	48.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	73.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	27.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	75.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	56.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	91.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.560/60 peersIndependent evidence	64.839/39 peersIndependent evidence	88.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	93.330/30 peersIndependent evidence	39.533/33 peersIndependent evidence	34.532/32 peersIndependent evidence	81.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	46.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	GLM-5.3 · MaxZ.ai Measured effort: Max	57.5	$2.00564Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration36 published · 26 families · 5 task areas17% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	94.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	61.948/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	98.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	93.5200/200 peersIndependent evidence	39.741/41 peersIndependent evidence	62.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	98.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	80.5213/213 peersIndependent evidence	74.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	92.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	30.131/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	80.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	97.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	98.4112/112 peersIndependent evidence	50.2126/126 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.325/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	80.66/6 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	63.060/60 peersIndependent evidence	56.939/39 peersIndependent evidence	29.225/25 peersIndependent evidence	66.630/30 peersIndependent evidence	68.433/33 peersIndependent evidence	90.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	32.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	68.332/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
12	GPT-5.6 Terra · MaxOpenAI Measured effort: Max	54.7	$1.39872Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration67 published · 38 families · 6 task areas14% weight: LiveBenchWhy this score?	—	85.287/87 peersIndependent evidence	96.148/48 peersIndependent evidence	92.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	93.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	94.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.7200/200 peersIndependent evidence	39.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	94.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	90.1123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.4213/213 peersIndependent evidence	35.750/50 peersIndependent evidence	95.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	84.2178/178 peersIndependent evidence	96.428/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	92.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	93.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	87.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	84.1202/202 peersIndependent evidence	42.6201/201 peersIndependent evidence	85.938/38 peersIndependent evidence	81.525/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	45.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	64.25/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	56.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	47.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	49.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	69.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	59.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	77.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	26.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	91.360/60 peersIndependent evidence	81.539/39 peersIndependent evidence	33.36/6 peersIndependent evidence	59.930/30 peersIndependent evidence	84.933/33 peersIndependent evidence	68.532/32 peersIndependent evidence	66.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	56.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
13	Muse Spark 1.2 · XHighMeta Measured effort: XHigh	45.6	$0.97469Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration54 published · 31 families · 5 task areas22% weight: Meta (reported)Why this score?	—	86.287/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	85.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	12.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	92.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	85.541/41 peersIndependent evidence	82.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	91.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	100.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	95.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	55.231/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	93.191/91 peersIndependent evidence	83.9112/112 peersIndependent evidence	62.9126/126 peersIndependent evidence	—	51.825/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	43.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	43.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	49.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	56.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	69.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	55.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	68.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	82.525/25 peersIndependent evidence	97.230/30 peersIndependent evidence	33.733/33 peersIndependent evidence	77.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	45.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	75.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	0.01/1 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	0.01/1 peersPublisher reports	—
14	Qwen 3.8-Max · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	45.2	$2.66998Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source16 published · 13 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	87.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	83.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	81.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	95.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	95.2123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	95.7114/114 peersIndependent evidence	82.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	84.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	100.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	87.6125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	DeepSeek V4-Pro 0813 · MaxDeepSeek Measured effort: Max	44.8	$0.67402Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration33 published · 25 families · 5 task areas28% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	82.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	89.148/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	82.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	90.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	93.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	94.641/41 peersIndependent evidence	66.588/88 peersIndependent evidence	90.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	86.8213/213 peersIndependent evidence	70.932/32 peersIndependent evidence	91.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	38.131/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	74.291/91 peersIndependent evidence	88.8112/112 peersIndependent evidence	50.2126/126 peersIndependent evidence	73.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	91.160/60 peersIndependent evidence	48.839/39 peersIndependent evidence	65.625/25 peersIndependent evidence	36.430/30 peersIndependent evidence	66.833/33 peersIndependent evidence	66.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	27.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	85.332/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	43.5	$2.15516Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source16 published · 13 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	89.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	58.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	92.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	95.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	95.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	80.588/88 peersIndependent evidence	94.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.3212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	81.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	86.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	96.8112/112 peersIndependent evidence	84.8125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	GLM-5.3-Flash · ReasoningZ.ai Measured effort: Reasoning	42.1	$0.25326On the cost frontierPrice source ↗	Single independent source16 published · 13 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	91.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	94.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	97.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	92.5200/200 peersIndependent evidence	39.441/41 peersIndependent evidence	77.988/88 peersIndependent evidence	98.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	75.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	80.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	93.7112/112 peersIndependent evidence	93.2125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	GPT-5.6 Luna · MaxOpenAI Measured effort: Max	40.7	$0.1783On the cost frontierPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration65 published · 38 families · 6 task areas14% weight: Vals AIWhy this score?	—	85.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	88.448/48 peersIndependent evidence	85.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	89.1198/198 peersIndependent evidence	82.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	95.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	54.941/41 peersIndependent evidence	94.588/88 peersIndependent evidence	90.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.2213/213 peersIndependent evidence	41.550/50 peersIndependent evidence	91.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	72.528/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	16.231/31 peersIndependent evidence	85.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	89.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	83.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	80.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	13.1126/126 peersIndependent evidence	62.538/38 peersIndependent evidence	71.125/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	10.46/6 peersIndependent evidence	55.55/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	24.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	73.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	14.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	61.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	29.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	32.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	16.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	71.360/60 peersIndependent evidence	78.339/39 peersIndependent evidence	16.76/6 peersIndependent evidence	63.230/30 peersIndependent evidence	72.933/33 peersIndependent evidence	37.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	74.932/32 peersIndependent evidence	65.532/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · ReasoningQwen Measured effort: Reasoning	40.7	$0.37218Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source15 published · 13 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	98.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	93.5197/197 peersIndependent evidence	88.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	90.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	80.588/88 peersIndependent evidence	96.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	91.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	91.2114/114 peersIndependent evidence	67.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	75.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	90.3112/112 peersIndependent evidence	93.7125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	Gemini 3.6 Flash · HighGoogle Measured effort: High	39.1	$0.92884Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration59 published · 34 families · 6 task areas15% weight: DatacurveWhy this score?	—	65.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	75.548/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	72.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	81.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	84.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	81.688/88 peersIndependent evidence	81.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.1213/213 peersIndependent evidence	46.050/50 peersIndependent evidence	90.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	67.431/31 peersIndependent evidence	96.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	93.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	80.291/91 peersIndependent evidence	77.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	68.3126/126 peersIndependent evidence	66.538/38 peersIndependent evidence	25.525/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	52.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	28.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	40.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	69.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	29.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	20.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	45.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	76.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	72.560/60 peersIndependent evidence	33.639/39 peersIndependent evidence	78.725/25 peersIndependent evidence	69.730/30 peersIndependent evidence	34.133/33 peersIndependent evidence	22.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	62.932/32 peersIndependent evidence	35.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	Claude Sonnet 5 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	38.0	$5.09116Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration38 published · 28 families · 6 task areas19% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	79.828/28 peersIndependent evidence	86.287/87 peersIndependent evidence	49.448/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	75.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	92.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	78.541/41 peersIndependent evidence	73.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	91.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	49.2213/213 peersIndependent evidence	55.150/50 peersIndependent evidence	93.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	43.831/31 peersIndependent evidence	80.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	89.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	87.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	85.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	12.3126/126 peersIndependent evidence	—	37.325/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	50.87/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	67.760/60 peersIndependent evidence	51.639/39 peersIndependent evidence	24.725/25 peersIndependent evidence	53.630/30 peersIndependent evidence	71.633/33 peersIndependent evidence	71.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	70.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	80.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	Grok-4.5 · HighxAI Measured effort: High	37.3	$1.03646Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration42 published · 31 families · 6 task areas13% weight: DatacurveWhy this score?	52.128/28 peersIndependent evidence	82.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	82.848/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	71.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	92.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	89.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	55.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	85.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	85.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	89.9213/213 peersIndependent evidence	87.250/50 peersIndependent evidence	93.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	64.431/31 peersIndependent evidence	90.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	94.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	85.991/91 peersIndependent evidence	91.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	7.8126/126 peersIndependent evidence	54.638/38 peersIndependent evidence	46.525/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	28.86/6 peersIndependent evidence	33.31/1 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	57.17/7 peersIndependent evidence	79.950/50 peersIndependent evidence	33.939/39 peersIndependent evidence	44.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	23.430/30 peersIndependent evidence	48.633/33 peersIndependent evidence	42.332/32 peersIndependent evidence	25.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	40.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 · MaxDeepSeek Measured effort: Max	37.1	$0.21964Within budgetPrice source ↗	Independent corroboration24 published · 18 families · 5 task areas27% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	81.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	74.048/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	74.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	84.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	90.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	61.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	88.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.2213/213 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	87.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	69.591/91 peersIndependent evidence	87.7112/112 peersIndependent evidence	83.5125/125 peersIndependent evidence	74.338/38 peersIndependent evidence	36.925/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	75.860/60 peersIndependent evidence	39.739/39 peersIndependent evidence	21.225/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	DeepSeek V4-Pro 0424 · MaxDeepSeek Measured effort: Max	34.9	$0.12152Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source23 published · 18 families · 5 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	58.528/28 peersIndependent evidence	67.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	65.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	82.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	90.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	92.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	61.841/41 peersIndependent evidence	75.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	81.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	89.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	70.737/37 peersIndependent evidence	92.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	95.5178/178 peersIndependent evidence	80.728/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	91.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	77.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	87.7202/202 peersIndependent evidence	86.3201/201 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	Qwen3.8-27B · XHighQwen Measured effort: XHigh	34.2	$0.82019Within budgetPrice source ↗	Single independent source18 published · 14 families · 6 task areas100% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	87.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	90.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	79.689/89 peersIndependent evidence	85.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	83.441/41 peersIndependent evidence	80.688/88 peersIndependent evidence	90.7123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	85.1114/114 peersIndependent evidence	29.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	59.391/91 peersIndependent evidence	94.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	79.9125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Behind the ranking

273 entries with published results · 55 ranked · 167 unranked in Value.

Explore seven capabilities, the original results, and gaps in the evidence.

Coding ranking Reasoning ranking Agentic ranking Compare capabilities ↗Published benchmarks ↗Evidence coverage ↗

Cite this ranking

Include the model and effort setting, the selected profile, and the dated data downloads. A shared link uses the latest data; it does not freeze a ranking in time.

UnifyBench ranking
Data updated: 12 Sept 2026
Mode: value; evidence: documented; configurations: best
Pricing collected: 11 Sept 2026
Cost basis: measured; budget: unlimited USD; input: 1000; output: 1000
https://unifybench.ai/?evidence=documented&mode=value&view=shortlist

Catalog data · Effort measurements · Configuration scoring rules · Methodology

Catalog dated 12 Sept 2026. Effort evidence collected 12 Sept 2026. Collection dates are not evaluation dates.

What does the score mean?

The adjusted comparison score estimates performance against the same reference panel from matched published comparisons. Capability pools matched comparisons across families and checks aggregate breadth and independent corroboration. Custom profiles require support in every selected capability. Missing results never count as losses.

Family details show observed win shares against available reference peers. Those descriptive values are supporting evidence, not adjusted capability scores. Provider reports and independent results remain labeled. Matching reported settings do not establish equal inference effort, and score differences do not establish statistical significance.

Read the full methodology →