The leaders, at a glance

UnifyBench ranking

Name: UnifyBench public ranking snapshot
Creator: UnifyBench
Published: 2026-09-12T08:38:19.822Z

Compare AI models and measured effort settings across published benchmarks.

See the full ranking ↓How configurations are ranked

Capability leaders

Experimental comparison score · 0–100

For the selected profile and sources. Scores are experimental; small gaps may not be meaningful. How scoring works · Effort evidence collected 2026-09-12

451unique modelsEach model counted once across effort levels 492model configurationsDocumented model + effort settings, including unranked

109aggregated sourcesOriginal reports and benchmark leaderboards

Explore all 109 sources Independent evaluations and lab reports

Distinct source pages with published results in the catalog. Multiple results and page sections count as one source.

Every ranked row is a measured configuration. The default view shows the highest-scoring supported configuration per model. In Value, the budget is applied first. Select All efforts for the full comparison. How effort ranking works.

Customize ranking

Full ranking

398 entries

Capability ranking of measured model configurations. Scores are experimental; missing results remain unknown.
Rank	Model	Score	Evidence breadth	analyst-agent	briefcase	aime	apex-agents	aa-lcr	automationbench	critpt	enterprise-ops	gdp-pdf	gdpval	gmmlu	gpqa	harvey	hle	ifbench	itbench	livecodebench	math500	mmlu-pro	mmmu-pro	omniscience	scicode	tau-bench	terminal-bench	arc-agi	deepswe	swe-bench-pro	arc-agi-3	frontiercode	enigma-eval	swe-atlas-qna	swe-atlas-refactoring	swe-atlas-test-writing	livebench-math	livebench-coding	livebench-language	livebench-data	multi-swe-bench	livebench-reasoning	livebench-instructions	swe-rebench	epoch-game-puzzles	frontiermath	simpleqa	vals-finance-agent	vals-code-migration	vals-legal-research	vals-excel-modeling	vibe-code	chartography	osworld	charxiv	swe-bench-multilingual	deepsearchqa	officeqa	mcp-atlas	toolathlon	mrcr	browsecomp
1	Claude Fable 5.1 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	85.8	Independent corroboration63 published · 35 families · 6 task areas25% weight: Anthropic (reported)Why this score?	96.928/28 peersIndependent evidence	100.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	98.448/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	99.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	100.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.4212/212 peersIndependent evidence	66.550/50 peersIndependent evidence	100.0208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	100.031/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	100.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	94.2112/112 peersIndependent evidence	100.0125/125 peersIndependent evidence	97.738/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	87.47/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	91.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	91.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	79.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	64.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	87.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	77.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	66.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.960/60 peersIndependent evidence	95.739/39 peersIndependent evidence	97.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	87.030/30 peersIndependent evidence	90.733/33 peersIndependent evidence	98.332/32 peersIndependent evidence	100.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	96.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	100.02/2 peersPublisher reports	100.02/2 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2	GPT-6 Astra · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	83.1	Independent corroboration26 published · 20 families · 6 task areas25% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	95.787/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	93.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	100.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	99.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	92.7123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	100.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	99.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	91.191/91 peersIndependent evidence	88.4112/112 peersIndependent evidence	99.8125/125 peersIndependent evidence	100.038/38 peersIndependent evidence	100.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	100.05/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.029/29 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
3	GPT-6 Astra · HighOpenAI Measured effort: High	80.8	Independent corroboration23 published · 18 families · 6 task areas29% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	94.787/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	94.0197/197 peersIndependent evidence	99.489/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	92.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.4208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	100.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	99.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	90.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	86.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	99.8125/125 peersIndependent evidence	99.638/38 peersIndependent evidence	97.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	100.05/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.029/29 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
4	GPT-6 Astra · MediumOpenAI Measured effort: Medium	79.6	Independent corroboration23 published · 18 families · 6 task areas29% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	93.187/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	93.1197/197 peersIndependent evidence	99.489/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	91.7123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	99.7114/114 peersIndependent evidence	99.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	88.391/91 peersIndependent evidence	82.4112/112 peersIndependent evidence	99.6125/125 peersIndependent evidence	99.638/38 peersIndependent evidence	95.525/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	98.45/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.029/29 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5	GPT-6 Astra · MaxOpenAI Measured effort: Max	77.6	Independent corroboration62 published · 35 families · 6 task areas14% weight: LiveBenchWhy this score?	89.728/28 peersIndependent evidence	96.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	98.148/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	89.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	100.089/89 peersIndependent evidence	99.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	93.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.0213/213 peersIndependent evidence	49.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	99.5208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	100.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	99.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	92.591/91 peersIndependent evidence	88.2112/112 peersIndependent evidence	100.0126/126 peersIndependent evidence	100.038/38 peersIndependent evidence	96.725/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	100.05/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	79.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	64.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	77.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	90.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	62.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	78.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	74.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.060/60 peersIndependent evidence	100.039/39 peersIndependent evidence	100.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	43.330/30 peersIndependent evidence	100.033/33 peersIndependent evidence	56.332/32 peersIndependent evidence	84.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	93.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
6	Claude Opus 5 · MediumAnthropic Measured effort: Medium	75.7	Independent corroboration20 published · 15 families · 6 task areas46% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	90.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	97.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	85.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.4200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	92.9123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	95.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	95.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	98.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	78.691/91 peersIndependent evidence	83.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	96.1125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	83.325/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	96.97/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
7	Claude Fable 5.1 · XHighAnthropic Measured effort: XHigh	75.3	Independent corroboration23 published · 16 families · 5 task areas29% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	100.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	98.8197/197 peersIndependent evidence	93.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	99.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	100.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.6212/212 peersIndependent evidence	96.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	94.8208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	99.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	91.2112/112 peersIndependent evidence	99.8125/125 peersIndependent evidence	98.438/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	87.57/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	100.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
8	Claude Fable 5 · HighAnthropic Measured effort: High	74.0	Independent corroboration10 published · 9 families · 2 task areas18% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	—	98.948/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	57.247/47 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.03/3 peersIndependent evidence	95.338/38 peersIndependent evidence	78.625/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	98.67/7 peersIndependent evidence	100.04/4 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	71.77/7 peersIndependent evidence	92.450/50 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
9	Claude Opus 5 · XHighAnthropic Measured effort: XHigh	73.3	Independent corroboration21 published · 17 families · 6 task areas36% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	99.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	96.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	84.989/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	91.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	99.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.5208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	97.8114/114 peersIndependent evidence	99.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	91.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	87.5112/112 peersIndependent evidence	97.7125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.625/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	67.67/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
10	Claude Opus 5 · HighAnthropic Measured effort: High	72.4	Independent corroboration24 published · 18 families · 6 task areas25% weight: ARC PrizeWhy this score?	—	96.487/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	93.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	85.489/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.788/88 peersIndependent evidence	94.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	96.6114/114 peersIndependent evidence	98.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	90.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	88.3112/112 peersIndependent evidence	97.5125/125 peersIndependent evidence	94.238/38 peersIndependent evidence	94.725/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	86.76/6 peersIndependent evidence	70.27/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.07/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
11	Claude Fable 5.1 · HighAnthropic Measured effort: High	72.2	Independent corroboration19 published · 15 families · 5 task areas35% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	96.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	99.6197/197 peersIndependent evidence	87.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	99.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	97.4123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.7212/212 peersIndependent evidence	96.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	100.0208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	99.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	96.791/91 peersIndependent evidence	87.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	97.9126/126 peersIndependent evidence	97.838/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	89.27/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
12	GPT-5.6 Sol · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	72.0	Independent corroboration25 published · 18 families · 6 task areas27% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	87.987/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	88.4198/198 peersIndependent evidence	87.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	93.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	83.9178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	97.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	98.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	94.991/91 peersIndependent evidence	80.2202/202 peersIndependent evidence	96.8201/201 peersIndependent evidence	98.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	87.125/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	85.75/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
13	Claude Fable 5.1 · MediumAnthropic Measured effort: Medium	70.8	Independent corroboration18 published · 15 families · 5 task areas37% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	95.287/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	100.0197/197 peersIndependent evidence	87.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.3200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	93.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.9212/212 peersIndependent evidence	96.037/37 peersIndependent evidence	99.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	93.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	85.6112/112 peersIndependent evidence	98.2125/125 peersIndependent evidence	97.238/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	90.97/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
14	Muse Spark 1.3 · XHighMeta Measured effort: XHigh	70.3	Independent corroboration49 published · 27 families · 6 task areas33% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	93.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	98.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	98.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	98.8123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.1212/212 peersIndependent evidence	98.250/50 peersIndependent evidence	98.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	93.7114/114 peersIndependent evidence	90.0198/198 peersIndependent evidence	98.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	95.3112/112 peersIndependent evidence	76.7126/126 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	82.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	76.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	56.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	75.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	89.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	74.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	90.526/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	92.730/30 peersIndependent evidence	—	70.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	57.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	93.232/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	100.01/1 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	100.01/1 peersPublisher reports	—
15	Gemini 3.8 Flash · MediumGoogle Measured effort: Medium	70.0	Independent corroboration18 published · 15 families · 6 task areas38% weight: Artificial AnalysisWhy this score?	—	76.787/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	99.7197/197 peersIndependent evidence	97.589/89 peersIndependent evidence	90.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.388/88 peersIndependent evidence	89.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	94.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	98.3114/114 peersIndependent evidence	96.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	90.091/91 peersIndependent evidence	91.1112/112 peersIndependent evidence	89.8125/125 peersIndependent evidence	—	90.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	85.66/6 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	GPT-5.6 Sol · MaxOpenAI Measured effort: Max	69.8	Independent corroboration81 published · 44 families · 6 task areas24% weight: Moonshot AI (reported)Why this score?	80.428/28 peersIndependent evidence	92.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	98.448/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	81.189/89 peersIndependent evidence	100.0200/200 peersIndependent evidence	65.941/41 peersIndependent evidence	98.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	93.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.3213/213 peersIndependent evidence	43.550/50 peersIndependent evidence	86.3208/208 peersIndependent evidence	87.7178/178 peersIndependent evidence	100.028/28 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	61.231/31 peersIndependent evidence	99.3115/115 peersIndependent evidence	98.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	93.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	84.2202/202 peersIndependent evidence	74.6201/201 peersIndependent evidence	98.938/38 peersIndependent evidence	92.425/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	70.96/6 peersIndependent evidence	85.75/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	63.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	90.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	79.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	72.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	63.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	82.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	61.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.860/60 peersIndependent evidence	92.339/39 peersIndependent evidence	66.76/6 peersIndependent evidence	49.930/30 peersIndependent evidence	87.833/33 peersIndependent evidence	85.932/32 peersIndependent evidence	90.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	78.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	68.33/3 peersPublisher reports	53.33/3 peersPublisher reports	—	—	53.64/4 peersPublisher reports	65.84/4 peersPublisher reports	53.64/4 peersPublisher reports	—	—
17	GPT-6 Astra · LowOpenAI Measured effort: Low	69.2	Independent corroboration23 published · 18 families · 6 task areas29% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	82.887/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	94.0197/197 peersIndependent evidence	95.889/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	100.088/88 peersIndependent evidence	88.7123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.2212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.1208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	99.0114/114 peersIndependent evidence	99.3198/198 peersIndependent evidence	87.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	79.9112/112 peersIndependent evidence	99.1125/125 peersIndependent evidence	93.338/38 peersIndependent evidence	75.225/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.96/6 peersIndependent evidence	90.35/5 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	97.529/29 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	Claude Fable 5 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	69.0	Independent corroboration67 published · 37 families · 6 task areas20% weight: Anthropic (reported)Why this score?	83.828/28 peersIndependent evidence	95.687/87 peersIndependent evidence	100.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	84.489/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	100.041/41 peersIndependent evidence	95.288/88 peersIndependent evidence	95.3123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	68.3213/213 peersIndependent evidence	94.537/37 peersIndependent evidence	99.7208/208 peersIndependent evidence	73.6178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	93.231/31 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	99.891/91 peersIndependent evidence	92.0202/202 peersIndependent evidence	39.3201/201 peersIndependent evidence	96.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	84.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	97.97/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	78.126/26 peersIndependent evidence	82.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	80.226/26 peersIndependent evidence	64.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	83.926/26 peersIndependent evidence	63.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	74.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.940/40 peersIndependent evidence	93.739/39 peersIndependent evidence	—	73.230/30 peersIndependent evidence	94.033/33 peersIndependent evidence	93.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	96.732/32 peersIndependent evidence	100.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	49.62/2 peersPublisher reports	0.02/2 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	Claude Opus 5 · MaxAnthropic Measured effort: Max	69.0	Independent corroboration66 published · 36 families · 6 task areas25% weight: Anthropic (reported)Why this score?	92.828/28 peersIndependent evidence	99.587/87 peersIndependent evidence	90.848/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.5198/198 peersIndependent evidence	7.289/89 peersIndependent evidence	98.2200/200 peersIndependent evidence	87.841/41 peersIndependent evidence	91.688/88 peersIndependent evidence	99.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.7213/213 peersIndependent evidence	66.350/50 peersIndependent evidence	99.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	97.031/31 peersIndependent evidence	98.4114/114 peersIndependent evidence	99.2198/198 peersIndependent evidence	91.591/91 peersIndependent evidence	90.0112/112 peersIndependent evidence	69.5125/125 peersIndependent evidence	97.438/38 peersIndependent evidence	97.325/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	70.07/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	72.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	73.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	75.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	43.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	85.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	70.726/26 peersIndependent evidence	23.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	92.560/60 peersIndependent evidence	83.739/39 peersIndependent evidence	50.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.533/33 peersIndependent evidence	98.532/32 peersIndependent evidence	94.032/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	0.02/2 peersPublisher reports	50.02/2 peersPublisher reports	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	Claude Fable 5 · MediumAnthropic Measured effort: Medium	69.0	Independent corroboration4 published · 3 families · 2 task areas42% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	90.838/38 peersIndependent evidence	68.725/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	89.17/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	Gemini 3.8 Flash · HighGoogle Measured effort: High	68.9	Independent corroboration58 published · 33 families · 6 task areas15% weight: Epoch AIWhy this score?	—	79.387/87 peersIndependent evidence	89.948/48 peersIndependent evidence	—	85.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	95.689/89 peersIndependent evidence	93.6200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	91.188/88 peersIndependent evidence	89.5123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.6213/213 peersIndependent evidence	84.432/32 peersIndependent evidence	97.9208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	86.831/31 peersIndependent evidence	99.5114/114 peersIndependent evidence	96.8198/198 peersIndependent evidence	92.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	92.5112/112 peersIndependent evidence	98.4126/126 peersIndependent evidence	—	99.025/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	74.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	60.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	4.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	81.826/26 peersIndependent evidence	10.426/26 peersIndependent evidence	56.626/26 peersIndependent evidence	61.326/26 peersIndependent evidence	98.026/26 peersIndependent evidence	—	93.360/60 peersIndependent evidence	41.939/39 peersIndependent evidence	92.425/25 peersIndependent evidence	100.030/30 peersIndependent evidence	46.133/33 peersIndependent evidence	53.132/32 peersIndependent evidence	87.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	71.632/32 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	Claude Fable 5 · XHighAnthropic Measured effort: XHigh	68.1	Independent corroboration9 published · 8 families · 3 task areas22% weight: ScaleWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	100.04/4 peersIndependent evidence	95.938/38 peersIndependent evidence	84.225/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	100.07/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	0.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	0.01/1 peersIndependent evidence	50.02/2 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	79.66/6 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	GPT-5.6 Sol · HighOpenAI Measured effort: High	66.4	Independent corroboration26 published · 19 families · 6 task areas24% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	85.087/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	86.9198/198 peersIndependent evidence	87.389/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.1200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.488/88 peersIndependent evidence	92.0123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	96.7212/212 peersIndependent evidence	—	97.6208/208 peersIndependent evidence	82.3178/178 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	94.9114/114 peersIndependent evidence	98.7198/198 peersIndependent evidence	95.491/91 peersIndependent evidence	78.1202/202 peersIndependent evidence	96.0201/201 peersIndependent evidence	93.338/38 peersIndependent evidence	83.825/25 peersIndependent evidence	—	71.06/6 peersIndependent evidence	83.75/5 peersIndependent evidence	67.24/4 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	Claude Fable 5.1 · LowAnthropic Measured effort: Low	65.5	Independent corroboration18 published · 15 families · 5 task areas37% weight: CognitionWhy this score?	—	93.987/87 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	98.3197/197 peersIndependent evidence	84.789/89 peersIndependent evidence	97.9200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	98.888/88 peersIndependent evidence	92.6123/123 peersIndependent evidence	—	88.0212/212 peersIndependent evidence	95.437/37 peersIndependent evidence	99.2208/208 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	99.6198/198 peersIndependent evidence	94.591/91 peersIndependent evidence	84.2112/112 peersIndependent evidence	96.2125/125 peersIndependent evidence	91.238/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	87.97/7 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	GPT-5.5 Pro · XHighOpenAI Measured effort: XHigh	65.5	Independent corroboration4 published · 3 families · 1 task areas60% weight: ARC PrizeWhy this score?	—	—	—	—	—	—	99.8200/200 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	91.138/38 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	92.239/39 peersIndependent evidence	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Behind the ranking

606 entries with published results · 398 ranked · 71 provisional estimates.

Explore seven capabilities, the original results, and gaps in the evidence.

Coding ranking Reasoning ranking Agentic ranking Compare capabilities ↗Published benchmarks ↗Evidence coverage ↗

Cite this ranking

Include the model and effort setting, the selected profile, and the dated data downloads. A shared link uses the latest data; it does not freeze a ranking in time.

UnifyBench ranking
Data updated: 12 Sept 2026
Mode: overall; evidence: documented; configurations: all
https://unifybench.ai/?efforts=all&evidence=documented&mode=overall

Catalog data · Effort measurements · Configuration scoring rules · Methodology

Catalog dated 12 Sept 2026. Effort evidence collected 12 Sept 2026. Collection dates are not evaluation dates.

What does the score mean?

The adjusted comparison score estimates performance against the same reference panel from matched published comparisons. Capability pools matched comparisons across families and checks aggregate breadth and independent corroboration. Custom profiles require support in every selected capability. Missing results never count as losses.

Family details show observed win shares against available reference peers. Those descriptive values are supporting evidence, not adjusted capability scores. Provider reports and independent results remain labeled. Matching reported settings do not establish equal inference effort, and score differences do not establish statistical significance.

Read the full methodology →